Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Jaber Yaghini, Ahmad Mogharehabed, Awat Feizi, Zohreh Afshari
{"title":"Efficacy of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jaber Yaghini,&nbsp;Ahmad Mogharehabed,&nbsp;Awat Feizi,&nbsp;Zohreh Afshari","doi":"10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was done to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies on the efficacy of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in increasing the soft tissue thickness (STT) and keratinized mucosal width (KMW) around dental implants. The PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched by July 2020 to retrieve relevant studies. Depending upon the heterogeneity of included studies, the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI was calculated using either fixed or random-effects model. Based on the meta-analysis of 6 studies, the effect of ADM on STT and KMW was significant (WMD: 1.07 [95% CI: 0.34-1.79], P = .004, and WMD: 1.99 [95% CI: 0.88-3.09], P < .001, respectively). Further, a comparison between the efficacy of the ADM and the control group, which included the autogenous soft tissue augmentation techniques, showed no statistically significant differences between groups (STT: WMD: 0.24 [95% CI: -0.26 to 0.74], P = .161 and KMW: WMD: -0.23 [95% CI: -0.68 to 0.22], P = .324). The subgroup analysis showed that simultaneous augmentation and implant placement were increased by 0.23 mm in the KMW, and the placement of ADM around loaded implants caused 0.5 mm decrease in the KMW, which was not statistically significant. Accordingly, it is possible to substitute ADM for soft tissue augmentation around dental implants.</p>","PeriodicalId":50101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Implantology","volume":"49 2","pages":"197-205"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study was done to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the studies on the efficacy of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) in increasing the soft tissue thickness (STT) and keratinized mucosal width (KMW) around dental implants. The PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched by July 2020 to retrieve relevant studies. Depending upon the heterogeneity of included studies, the weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI was calculated using either fixed or random-effects model. Based on the meta-analysis of 6 studies, the effect of ADM on STT and KMW was significant (WMD: 1.07 [95% CI: 0.34-1.79], P = .004, and WMD: 1.99 [95% CI: 0.88-3.09], P < .001, respectively). Further, a comparison between the efficacy of the ADM and the control group, which included the autogenous soft tissue augmentation techniques, showed no statistically significant differences between groups (STT: WMD: 0.24 [95% CI: -0.26 to 0.74], P = .161 and KMW: WMD: -0.23 [95% CI: -0.68 to 0.22], P = .324). The subgroup analysis showed that simultaneous augmentation and implant placement were increased by 0.23 mm in the KMW, and the placement of ADM around loaded implants caused 0.5 mm decrease in the KMW, which was not statistically significant. Accordingly, it is possible to substitute ADM for soft tissue augmentation around dental implants.

脱细胞真皮基质在牙种植体周围软组织增强中的效果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本研究旨在对脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)在增加种植体周围软组织厚度(STT)和角化粘膜宽度(KMW)方面的研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析。到2020年7月,检索PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane、Web of Science和ProQuest数据库以检索相关研究。根据纳入研究的异质性,采用固定或随机效应模型计算95% CI的加权平均差(WMD)。通过对6项研究的荟萃分析,ADM对STT和KMW的影响显著(WMD: 1.07 [95% CI: 0.34-1.79], P = 0.004; WMD: 1.99 [95% CI: 0.88-3.09], P < 0.001)。此外,ADM与对照组(包括自体软组织增强技术)的疗效比较,两组间无统计学差异(STT: WMD: 0.24 [95% CI: -0.26至0.74],P = 0.161; KMW: WMD: -0.23 [95% CI: -0.68至0.22],P = 0.324)。亚组分析显示,同时隆牙和种植体放置的KMW增加了0.23 mm,在负载种植体周围放置ADM使KMW减少了0.5 mm,差异无统计学意义。因此,可以用ADM代替种植体周围的软组织增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Implantology
Journal of Oral Implantology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
54
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication of the American Academy of Implant Dentistry and of the American Academy of Implant Prosthodontics, is dedicated to providing valuable information to general dentists, oral surgeons, prosthodontists, periodontists, scientists, clinicians, laboratory owners and technicians, manufacturers, and educators. Implant basics, prosthetics, pharmaceuticals, the latest research in implantology, implant surgery, and advanced implant procedures are just some of the topics covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信