{"title":"Factors associated with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in patients suffering from non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Mahmood Rezaee, Amirhossein Azhari, Davood Shafie","doi":"10.48305/arya.2022.24342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although intra-cardiac shocks are a lifesaving approach in patients with systolic heart failure (HF), the probable effective factors related to shock occurrence are less frequently recognized. We designed this study to assess the factors associated with inappropriate or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-nine patients with NICM who implanted ICD were enrolled from March 2018 to September 2019 and followed up with a three-month interval for up to one year. Shock therapy was defined as either appropriate or inappropriate shock. The odds ratio (OR) of inappropriate shock occurrence was calculated with crude and different adjusted models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the population at baseline was 51.9 ± 15.4 years (men: 71%). Baseline data revealed that patients with inappropriate shocks had higher heart rates (HR), worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) as well as higher percentages of amiodarone usage compared to groups with appropriate or no shock [HR: 96.8 ± 27.8 vs. 79.8 ± 12.1 vs. 76.2 ± 17.6 beats per minute (bpm), P = 0.014; NYHA class IV: 85.7% vs. 74.1% vs. 63.4%, P = 0.041; ATP: 37.5% vs. 29% vs. 5%, P = 0.010; amiodarone usage: 37.5% vs. 25.8% vs. 5%, P = 0.23, respectively]. Further multiple-adjusted OR did not reveal any significant independent association between the aforementioned variables and inappropriate shock incidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates no significant independent predisposing factor in the occurrence of inappropriate shocks among patients with NICM. Other studies are required in this regard.</p>","PeriodicalId":46477,"journal":{"name":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","volume":"18 3","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/89/29/ARYA-18-7-2256.PMC9931942.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARYA Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48305/arya.2022.24342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although intra-cardiac shocks are a lifesaving approach in patients with systolic heart failure (HF), the probable effective factors related to shock occurrence are less frequently recognized. We designed this study to assess the factors associated with inappropriate or appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).
Methods: Ninety-nine patients with NICM who implanted ICD were enrolled from March 2018 to September 2019 and followed up with a three-month interval for up to one year. Shock therapy was defined as either appropriate or inappropriate shock. The odds ratio (OR) of inappropriate shock occurrence was calculated with crude and different adjusted models.
Results: The mean age of the population at baseline was 51.9 ± 15.4 years (men: 71%). Baseline data revealed that patients with inappropriate shocks had higher heart rates (HR), worse New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) as well as higher percentages of amiodarone usage compared to groups with appropriate or no shock [HR: 96.8 ± 27.8 vs. 79.8 ± 12.1 vs. 76.2 ± 17.6 beats per minute (bpm), P = 0.014; NYHA class IV: 85.7% vs. 74.1% vs. 63.4%, P = 0.041; ATP: 37.5% vs. 29% vs. 5%, P = 0.010; amiodarone usage: 37.5% vs. 25.8% vs. 5%, P = 0.23, respectively]. Further multiple-adjusted OR did not reveal any significant independent association between the aforementioned variables and inappropriate shock incidence.
Conclusion: This study indicates no significant independent predisposing factor in the occurrence of inappropriate shocks among patients with NICM. Other studies are required in this regard.
背景:虽然心脏内休克是收缩期心力衰竭(HF)患者的救命方法,但与休克发生相关的可能有效因素却很少被认识到。我们设计了这项研究来评估与非缺血性心肌病(NICM)患者不适当或适当的植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)电击相关的因素。方法:2018年3月至2019年9月,入组99例植入ICD的NICM患者,每隔3个月随访1年。休克治疗被定义为适当或不适当的休克。采用粗糙模型和不同调整模型计算不适当冲击发生的比值比(OR)。结果:基线时人群平均年龄为51.9±15.4岁(男性占71%)。基线数据显示,与适当或无电击组相比,不适当电击的患者心率(HR)更高,纽约心脏协会(NYHA)等级更差,抗心动过速起搏(ATP)以及胺碘酮使用百分比更高[HR: 96.8±27.8 vs. 79.8±12.1 vs. 76.2±17.6次/分钟(bpm), P = 0.014;NYHA IV级:85.7% vs. 74.1% vs. 63.4%, P = 0.041;ATP: 37.5%比29%比5%,P = 0.010;胺碘酮使用率:37.5% vs. 25.8% vs. 5%, P = 0.23]。进一步的多重校正OR没有显示上述变量与不适当的休克发生率之间有任何显著的独立关联。结论:本研究提示NICM患者不适宜性休克的发生无明显的独立易感因素。这方面还需要进行其他研究。