Correlation Analysis between Residual Pain after Vertebral Augmentation and the Diffusion Distribution of Bone Cement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kang Yao, Yungang Chen, Xiaoying Wang, Qianqian Yao, Kaiying Cui, Wenming Chen, Pengfei Hou, Ning Yu, Zhenyue Zhang, Wenxin Gao, Haipeng Xue, Yanke Hao
{"title":"Correlation Analysis between Residual Pain after Vertebral Augmentation and the Diffusion Distribution of Bone Cement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Kang Yao,&nbsp;Yungang Chen,&nbsp;Xiaoying Wang,&nbsp;Qianqian Yao,&nbsp;Kaiying Cui,&nbsp;Wenming Chen,&nbsp;Pengfei Hou,&nbsp;Ning Yu,&nbsp;Zhenyue Zhang,&nbsp;Wenxin Gao,&nbsp;Haipeng Xue,&nbsp;Yanke Hao","doi":"10.1155/2023/1157611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the influence and potential factors of the bone cement dispersion state on residual pain after vertebral augmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cases included in this retrospective cohort study were patients treated with vertebral augmentation (VA) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) between July 2018 and June 2021. According to the type of cement diffusion distribution, the patients were divided into a sufficient diffusion group (Group A) and an insufficient diffusion group (Group B). The differences in the baseline data, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index score (ODI), injured vertebral height (IVH), and local kyphosis angle (LKA) between the two groups were analyzed. Assessments were performed preoperatively on the 2nd day postoperation and at the last follow-up. The imaging data of injured vertebrae were accurately reconstructed by a GE AW4.7 workstation, and the differences in the vertebral body volume, bone cement volume, and bone cement volume ratio were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>After screening, 36 patients were included. (1) The postoperative VAS and ODI scores of the two groups were significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores. (2) On the 2nd day postoperation and the last follow-up, the VAS and ODI scores of Group A were significantly different from those of Group B, and Group A outperformed Group B. (3) The IVH and LKA of the two groups were improved after the operation, and no significant difference was found between the groups. (4) Significant differences were found in the bone cement volume and bone cement volume ratio between the groups, and Group A was larger than Group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sufficient bone cement diffusion can reduce residual pain after vertebral augmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19913,"journal":{"name":"Pain Research & Management","volume":"2023 ","pages":"1157611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9833933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Research & Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1157611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the influence and potential factors of the bone cement dispersion state on residual pain after vertebral augmentation.

Methods: The cases included in this retrospective cohort study were patients treated with vertebral augmentation (VA) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) between July 2018 and June 2021. According to the type of cement diffusion distribution, the patients were divided into a sufficient diffusion group (Group A) and an insufficient diffusion group (Group B). The differences in the baseline data, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index score (ODI), injured vertebral height (IVH), and local kyphosis angle (LKA) between the two groups were analyzed. Assessments were performed preoperatively on the 2nd day postoperation and at the last follow-up. The imaging data of injured vertebrae were accurately reconstructed by a GE AW4.7 workstation, and the differences in the vertebral body volume, bone cement volume, and bone cement volume ratio were compared between the groups.

Result: After screening, 36 patients were included. (1) The postoperative VAS and ODI scores of the two groups were significantly improved compared with the preoperative scores. (2) On the 2nd day postoperation and the last follow-up, the VAS and ODI scores of Group A were significantly different from those of Group B, and Group A outperformed Group B. (3) The IVH and LKA of the two groups were improved after the operation, and no significant difference was found between the groups. (4) Significant differences were found in the bone cement volume and bone cement volume ratio between the groups, and Group A was larger than Group B.

Conclusions: Sufficient bone cement diffusion can reduce residual pain after vertebral augmentation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

椎体增强术后残余疼痛与骨水泥弥散分布的相关性分析:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的:探讨骨水泥弥散状态对椎体隆胸术后残余疼痛的影响及潜在因素。方法:本回顾性队列研究纳入的病例是2018年7月至2021年6月期间接受椎体增强术(VA)治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCFs)的患者。根据骨水泥弥散分布类型将患者分为充分弥散组(a组)和不充分弥散组(B组),分析两组患者基线数据、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry失能指数评分(ODI)、损伤椎体高度(IVH)、局部后凸角(LKA)的差异。术前于术后第2天及末次随访时进行评估。采用GE AW4.7工作站对损伤椎体影像数据进行精确重建,比较各组椎体体积、骨水泥体积、骨水泥体积比的差异。结果:经筛选,纳入36例患者。(1)两组患者术后VAS、ODI评分较术前均有明显改善。(2)术后第2天及末次随访时,A组VAS、ODI评分与B组比较差异有统计学意义,且A组优于B组。(3)术后两组IVH、LKA均有改善,组间差异无统计学意义。(4)各组间骨水泥体积及骨水泥体积比差异有统计学意义,且A组大于b组。结论:充分的骨水泥弥散可减轻椎体隆椎术后残留疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Research & Management
Pain Research & Management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Research and Management is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of pain management. The most recent Impact Factor for Pain Research and Management is 1.685 according to the 2015 Journal Citation Reports released by Thomson Reuters in 2016.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信