Sybille Seiler, Ciril Marius Wälti, Vanessa de Barros, Shahar Barbash, Lynette C Foo
{"title":"Higher throughput workflow with sensitive, reliable and automatic quantification of myelination in vitro suitable for drug screening.","authors":"Sybille Seiler, Ciril Marius Wälti, Vanessa de Barros, Shahar Barbash, Lynette C Foo","doi":"10.1038/s41598-023-29333-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common demyelinating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Immune-mediated myelin and axonal damage that is accompanied by chronic axonal loss causing destruction of the myelin sheaths are hallmarks of MS. While great strides have been made in understanding the molecular underpinnings of re-/myelination, currently no remyelination therapy is available for MS. As myelination is a complex process that is not fully understood, we sought to develop a systematic, reliable, automated and quantitative higher throughput screening method. We aimed to quantitate myelin sheaths in vitro with high sensitivity at the single cell level suitable for testing small compound libraries. To this end, we miniaturised in vitro retinal ganglion cell-oligodendrocyte precursor cell (RGC-OPC) co-cultures into a multi-well plate format. This allowed us to maintain the reciprocal interaction of live axons and oligodendrocytes (OLs) to ensure compact myelin formation. To quantify our co-cultures, we developed a novel computer vision algorithm to precisely measure myelination. We demonstrated efficacy of our system with known pro-differentiating compounds BQ3020 and XAV939 which exhibited robust, efficient, and dose dependent effects on myelination. Through this combination of experimental and technical advances, we have developed a method allowing systematic and reliable testing of remyelinating compound efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9938858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29333-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common demyelinating autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS). Immune-mediated myelin and axonal damage that is accompanied by chronic axonal loss causing destruction of the myelin sheaths are hallmarks of MS. While great strides have been made in understanding the molecular underpinnings of re-/myelination, currently no remyelination therapy is available for MS. As myelination is a complex process that is not fully understood, we sought to develop a systematic, reliable, automated and quantitative higher throughput screening method. We aimed to quantitate myelin sheaths in vitro with high sensitivity at the single cell level suitable for testing small compound libraries. To this end, we miniaturised in vitro retinal ganglion cell-oligodendrocyte precursor cell (RGC-OPC) co-cultures into a multi-well plate format. This allowed us to maintain the reciprocal interaction of live axons and oligodendrocytes (OLs) to ensure compact myelin formation. To quantify our co-cultures, we developed a novel computer vision algorithm to precisely measure myelination. We demonstrated efficacy of our system with known pro-differentiating compounds BQ3020 and XAV939 which exhibited robust, efficient, and dose dependent effects on myelination. Through this combination of experimental and technical advances, we have developed a method allowing systematic and reliable testing of remyelinating compound efficacy.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.