Clinical machine learning in parafunctional and altered functional occlusion: A systematic review.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-02-17 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.013
Taseef Hasan Farook, Farah Rashid, Saif Ahmed, James Dudley
{"title":"Clinical machine learning in parafunctional and altered functional occlusion: A systematic review.","authors":"Taseef Hasan Farook, Farah Rashid, Saif Ahmed, James Dudley","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Statement of problem: </strong>The advent of machine learning in the complex subject of occlusal rehabilitation warrants a thorough investigation into the techniques applied for successful clinical translation of computer automation. A systematic evaluation on the topic with subsequent discussion of the clinical variables involved is lacking.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to systematically critique the digital methods and techniques used to deploy automated diagnostic tools in the clinical evaluation of altered functional and parafunctional occlusion.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Articles were screened by 2 reviewers in mid-2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible articles were critically appraised by using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Diagnostic Test Accuracy (JBI-DTA) protocol and Minimum Information for Clinical Artificial Intelligence Modeling (MI-CLAIM) checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen articles were extracted. Variations in mandibular anatomic landmarks obtained via radiographs and photographs produced notable errors in prediction accuracy. While half of the studies adhered to robust methods of computer science, the lack of blinding to a reference standard and convenient exclusion of data in favor of accurate machine learning suggested that conventional diagnostic test methods were ineffective in regulating machine learning research in clinical occlusion. As preestablished baselines or criterion standards were lacking for model evaluation, a heavy reliance was placed on the validation provided by clinicians, often dental specialists, which was prone to subjective biases and largely governed by professional experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on the findings and because of the numerous clinical variables and inconsistencies, the current literature on dental machine learning presented nondefinitive but promising results in diagnosing functional and parafunctional occlusal parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"124-128"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of problem: The advent of machine learning in the complex subject of occlusal rehabilitation warrants a thorough investigation into the techniques applied for successful clinical translation of computer automation. A systematic evaluation on the topic with subsequent discussion of the clinical variables involved is lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to systematically critique the digital methods and techniques used to deploy automated diagnostic tools in the clinical evaluation of altered functional and parafunctional occlusion.

Material and methods: Articles were screened by 2 reviewers in mid-2022 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible articles were critically appraised by using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Diagnostic Test Accuracy (JBI-DTA) protocol and Minimum Information for Clinical Artificial Intelligence Modeling (MI-CLAIM) checklist.

Results: Sixteen articles were extracted. Variations in mandibular anatomic landmarks obtained via radiographs and photographs produced notable errors in prediction accuracy. While half of the studies adhered to robust methods of computer science, the lack of blinding to a reference standard and convenient exclusion of data in favor of accurate machine learning suggested that conventional diagnostic test methods were ineffective in regulating machine learning research in clinical occlusion. As preestablished baselines or criterion standards were lacking for model evaluation, a heavy reliance was placed on the validation provided by clinicians, often dental specialists, which was prone to subjective biases and largely governed by professional experience.

Conclusions: Based on the findings and because of the numerous clinical variables and inconsistencies, the current literature on dental machine learning presented nondefinitive but promising results in diagnosing functional and parafunctional occlusal parameters.

副功能性和改变功能性闭塞的临床机器学习:系统综述。
问题陈述:在复杂的咬合康复课题中,机器学习的出现需要对计算机自动化成功临床转化所应用的技术进行彻底的调查。目的:本研究的目的是系统地评论在临床评估功能性和准功能性咬合改变时使用自动化诊断工具的数字化方法和技术:2022年年中,两位审稿人根据系统性综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南筛选了相关文章。采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所的诊断测试准确性(JBI-DTA)协议和临床人工智能建模最低信息(MI-CLAIM)检查表对符合条件的文章进行严格评估:结果:共摘录了 16 篇文章。通过X光片和照片获得的下颌骨解剖地标存在差异,导致预测准确性存在明显误差。虽然半数研究采用了稳健的计算机科学方法,但由于缺乏盲法参考标准,以及为了准确的机器学习而方便地排除数据,这表明传统的诊断测试方法无法有效规范临床咬合的机器学习研究。由于缺乏用于模型评估的预先确定的基准或标准,因此在很大程度上依赖于临床医生(通常是牙科专家)提供的验证,这容易产生主观偏见,并在很大程度上受专业经验的制约:根据研究结果,由于存在大量临床变量和不一致性,目前关于牙科机器学习的文献在诊断功能性和准功能性咬合参数方面呈现出非确定性但有希望的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信