Recalibrating Transplant Eligibility Criteria: Ensuring Equitable Access to Organ Transplantation for Intellectually Disabled Persons.

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
Adam Peña
{"title":"Recalibrating Transplant Eligibility Criteria: Ensuring Equitable Access to Organ Transplantation for Intellectually Disabled Persons.","authors":"Adam Peña","doi":"10.1017/amj.2023.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act have made little progress towards preventing disability-based discrimination within the organ transplant evaluation process. Intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD) pose a unique problem for transplant teams and transplant physicians because I/DDs can simultaneously be a legitimate contraindication for transplantation and a mechanism for invidious discrimination against intellectually disabled persons. A culprit for ongoing disability-based discrimination is a transplant center's authority to develop its own eligibility criteria. While medical criteria for eligibility are generally well-settled, psychosocial criteria - an amorphous constellation of risk factors for post-transplant success - can serve as a facially neutral disguise for social worth determinations of individuals with I/DDs. Consequently, individuals with I/DDs are unjustifiably denied eligibility for organ transplantation and transplant-related services.This Article begins by identifying the pitfalls of current federal antidiscrimination legislation. It then discusses the foreseen benefits and drawbacks of House Resolution (H.R.) 8981, a recently proposed federal bill, that expressly prohibits disability-based discrimination within the organ transplant evaluation process. The Article ends by offering potential solutions for professional organizations and transplant centers that aim to provide for equitable access to organ transplantation and transplant-related services for intellectually disabled individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":7680,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","volume":"48 4","pages":"380-411"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Law & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/amj.2023.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act have made little progress towards preventing disability-based discrimination within the organ transplant evaluation process. Intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD) pose a unique problem for transplant teams and transplant physicians because I/DDs can simultaneously be a legitimate contraindication for transplantation and a mechanism for invidious discrimination against intellectually disabled persons. A culprit for ongoing disability-based discrimination is a transplant center's authority to develop its own eligibility criteria. While medical criteria for eligibility are generally well-settled, psychosocial criteria - an amorphous constellation of risk factors for post-transplant success - can serve as a facially neutral disguise for social worth determinations of individuals with I/DDs. Consequently, individuals with I/DDs are unjustifiably denied eligibility for organ transplantation and transplant-related services.This Article begins by identifying the pitfalls of current federal antidiscrimination legislation. It then discusses the foreseen benefits and drawbacks of House Resolution (H.R.) 8981, a recently proposed federal bill, that expressly prohibits disability-based discrimination within the organ transplant evaluation process. The Article ends by offering potential solutions for professional organizations and transplant centers that aim to provide for equitable access to organ transplantation and transplant-related services for intellectually disabled individuals.

重新调整移植资格标准:确保智障人士公平获得器官移植。
《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)和《康复法案》第504条在防止器官移植评估过程中基于残疾的歧视方面进展甚微。智力和发育障碍(I/DD)对移植团队和移植医生来说是一个独特的问题,因为智力和发育障碍可能同时是移植的合法禁忌症,也是对智力残疾者的一种令人反感的歧视机制。残障歧视持续存在的罪魁祸首是移植中心制定自己的资格标准的权力。虽然对资格的医学标准通常是确定的,但社会心理标准——移植后成功的各种风险因素——可以作为I/ dd患者社会价值决定的表面中立的伪装。因此,患有I/ dd的个人被不合理地剥夺了器官移植和移植相关服务的资格。本文首先指出当前联邦反歧视立法的缺陷。然后讨论了众议院决议(H.R.) 8981的可预见的好处和缺点,这是最近提出的一项联邦法案,明确禁止在器官移植评估过程中基于残疾的歧视。文章最后为专业组织和移植中心提供了潜在的解决方案,旨在为智障人士提供公平的器官移植和移植相关服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: desde Enero 2004 Último Numero: Octubre 2008 AJLM will solicit blind comments from expert peer reviewers, including faculty members of our editorial board, as well as from other preeminent health law and public policy academics and professionals from across the country and around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信