Stressors Among Healthcare Workers: A Summative Content Analysis.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
Lesley C Rink, Tolu O Oyesanya, Kathryn C Adair, Janice C Humphreys, Susan G Silva, John Bryan Sexton
{"title":"Stressors Among Healthcare Workers: A Summative Content Analysis.","authors":"Lesley C Rink,&nbsp;Tolu O Oyesanya,&nbsp;Kathryn C Adair,&nbsp;Janice C Humphreys,&nbsp;Susan G Silva,&nbsp;John Bryan Sexton","doi":"10.1177/23333936231161127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Healthcare workers are experiencing high stress and burnout, at rates up to 70%, hindering patient care. Studies often focus on stressors in a particular setting or within the context of the pandemic which limits understanding of a more comprehensive view of stressors experienced by healthcare workers. The purpose of this study was to assess healthcare workers' self-reported major stressors. Between June 2018 and April 2019, U.S. healthcare workers (<i>N</i> = 2,310) wrote answers to an open-ended question: \"What are your biggest stressors as you look back over the last few weeks?\" A summative content analysis was used to analyze the data. Healthcare workers described three types of stressors: work stressors (49% of total stressors), personal life stressors (32% of total stressors), and stressors that intersect work and personal life (19% of total stressors). Future research and clinical practice should consider the multi-faceted sources of stress.</p>","PeriodicalId":45940,"journal":{"name":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"23333936231161127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/33/ef/10.1177_23333936231161127.PMC10068501.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Qualitative Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936231161127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Healthcare workers are experiencing high stress and burnout, at rates up to 70%, hindering patient care. Studies often focus on stressors in a particular setting or within the context of the pandemic which limits understanding of a more comprehensive view of stressors experienced by healthcare workers. The purpose of this study was to assess healthcare workers' self-reported major stressors. Between June 2018 and April 2019, U.S. healthcare workers (N = 2,310) wrote answers to an open-ended question: "What are your biggest stressors as you look back over the last few weeks?" A summative content analysis was used to analyze the data. Healthcare workers described three types of stressors: work stressors (49% of total stressors), personal life stressors (32% of total stressors), and stressors that intersect work and personal life (19% of total stressors). Future research and clinical practice should consider the multi-faceted sources of stress.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医护人员压力源:总结性内容分析。
卫生保健工作者正经历着高压力和倦怠,比例高达70%,阻碍了对患者的护理。研究通常侧重于特定环境或大流行背景下的压力源,这限制了对卫生保健工作者所经历的压力源的更全面看法的理解。本研究的目的是评估医护人员自我报告的主要压力源。在2018年6月至2019年4月期间,美国医护人员(N = 2310)回答了一个开放式问题:“回顾过去几周,你最大的压力是什么?”采用总结性内容分析法对数据进行分析。医护人员描述了三种类型的压力源:工作压力源(占总压力源的49%),个人生活压力源(占总压力源的32%),以及工作和个人生活交叉的压力源(占总压力源的19%)。未来的研究和临床实践应考虑多方面的压力来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
41
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Qualitative Nursing Research (GQNR) is a ground breaking, international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal focusing on qualitative research in fields relevant to nursing and other health professionals world-wide. The journal specializes in topics related to nursing practice, responses to health and illness, health promotion, and health care delivery. GQNR will publish research articles using qualitative methods and qualitatively-driven mixed-method designs as well as meta-syntheses and articles focused on methodological development. Special sections include Ethics, Methodological Development, Advancing Theory/Metasynthesis, Establishing Evidence, and Application to Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信