Public attitudes to implementing financial incentives in stopsmoking services in Ireland.

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Ellen Cosgrave, Aishling Sheridan, Edward Murphy, Martina Blake, Rikke Siersbaek, Sarah Parker, Sara Burke, Frank Doyle, Paul Kavanagh
{"title":"Public attitudes to implementing financial incentives in stopsmoking services in Ireland.","authors":"Ellen Cosgrave,&nbsp;Aishling Sheridan,&nbsp;Edward Murphy,&nbsp;Martina Blake,&nbsp;Rikke Siersbaek,&nbsp;Sarah Parker,&nbsp;Sara Burke,&nbsp;Frank Doyle,&nbsp;Paul Kavanagh","doi":"10.18332/tpc/162364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Financial incentives improve stop-smoking service outcomes. Views on acceptability can influence implementation success. To inform implementation planning in Ireland, public attitudes on financial incentives to stop smoking were measured.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional telephone survey was administered to 1000 people in Ireland aged ≥15 years in 2022, sampled through random digit dialing. The questionnaire included items on support for financial incentives under different conditions. Prevalence of support was calculated with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and multiple logistic regression identified associated factors using adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost half (47.0%, 95% CI: 43.9-50.1) of the participants supported at least one type of financial incentive to stop smoking, with support more prevalent for shopping vouchers (43.3%, 95% CI: 40.3-46.5) than cash payments (32.1%, 95% CI: 29.2-35.0). Support was similar for universal and income-restricted schemes. Of those who supported financial incentives, the majority (60.6%) believed the maximum amount given on proof of stopping smoking should be under €250 (median=100, range: 1-7000). Compared to their counterparts, those of lower education level (AOR=1.49; 95% CI: 1.10-2.03, p=0.010) and tobacco/e-cigarette users (AOR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.02-2.03, p=0.041) were significantly more likely to support either financial incentive type, as were younger people.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While views on financial incentives to stop smoking in Ireland were mixed, the intervention is more acceptable in groups experiencing the heaviest burden of smoking-related harm and most capacity to benefit. Engagement and communication must be integral to planning for successful implementation to improve stop-smoking service outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10068872/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/162364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Financial incentives improve stop-smoking service outcomes. Views on acceptability can influence implementation success. To inform implementation planning in Ireland, public attitudes on financial incentives to stop smoking were measured.

Methods: A cross-sectional telephone survey was administered to 1000 people in Ireland aged ≥15 years in 2022, sampled through random digit dialing. The questionnaire included items on support for financial incentives under different conditions. Prevalence of support was calculated with 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and multiple logistic regression identified associated factors using adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% CIs.

Results: Almost half (47.0%, 95% CI: 43.9-50.1) of the participants supported at least one type of financial incentive to stop smoking, with support more prevalent for shopping vouchers (43.3%, 95% CI: 40.3-46.5) than cash payments (32.1%, 95% CI: 29.2-35.0). Support was similar for universal and income-restricted schemes. Of those who supported financial incentives, the majority (60.6%) believed the maximum amount given on proof of stopping smoking should be under €250 (median=100, range: 1-7000). Compared to their counterparts, those of lower education level (AOR=1.49; 95% CI: 1.10-2.03, p=0.010) and tobacco/e-cigarette users (AOR=1.43; 95% CI: 1.02-2.03, p=0.041) were significantly more likely to support either financial incentive type, as were younger people.

Conclusions: While views on financial incentives to stop smoking in Ireland were mixed, the intervention is more acceptable in groups experiencing the heaviest burden of smoking-related harm and most capacity to benefit. Engagement and communication must be integral to planning for successful implementation to improve stop-smoking service outcomes.

公众对在爱尔兰戒烟服务中实施财政激励的态度。
引言:财政激励可以改善戒烟服务的效果。对可接受性的看法会影响实现的成功。为了向爱尔兰的实施计划提供信息,我们测量了公众对戒烟财政激励的态度。方法:于2022年通过随机数字拨号对爱尔兰1000名年龄≥15岁的人进行横断面电话调查。问卷包括在不同情况下支持财政奖励的项目。采用95%置信区间(CIs)计算支持率,并采用校正优势比(AORs)和95% ci进行多元logistic回归,确定相关因素。结果:几乎一半(47.0%,95% CI: 43.9-50.1)的参与者支持至少一种类型的财务激励来戒烟,支持购物券(43.3%,95% CI: 40.3-46.5)比现金支付(32.1%,95% CI: 29.2-35.0)更为普遍。对普遍计划和收入限制计划的支持情况类似。在那些支持经济奖励的人中,大多数人(60.6%)认为戒烟证明的最高金额应低于250欧元(中位数=100,范围:1-7000)。与同辈相比,受教育程度较低者(AOR=1.49;95% CI: 1.10-2.03, p=0.010)和烟草/电子烟使用者(AOR=1.43;95% CI: 1.02-2.03, p=0.041)和年轻人一样,更有可能支持任何一种财务激励类型。结论:虽然对爱尔兰戒烟的财政激励的看法不一,但在经历吸烟相关危害负担最重和最有能力受益的群体中,这种干预更容易被接受。参与和沟通必须成为成功实施计划的组成部分,以改善戒烟服务的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信