Ecotoxicity of pesticide formulations and their mixtures: the case of potato crops in Costa Rica.

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Michael Méndez-Rivera, Didier Ramírez-Morales, José R Montiel-Mora, Carlos E Rodríguez-Rodríguez
{"title":"Ecotoxicity of pesticide formulations and their mixtures: the case of potato crops in Costa Rica.","authors":"Michael Méndez-Rivera,&nbsp;Didier Ramírez-Morales,&nbsp;José R Montiel-Mora,&nbsp;Carlos E Rodríguez-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1007/s10646-023-02648-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite their environmental implications, ecotoxicological information regarding pesticide mixtures is relatively scarce. This study aimed to determine the ecotoxicity of individual pesticide formulations and their mixtures (insecticides and fungicides), which are applied during the production cycle of potato, according to agricultural practices from a Latin American region in Costa Rica. Two benchmark organisms were employed: Daphnia magna and Lactuca sativa. First, the evaluation of individual formulations (chlorothalonil, propineb, deltamethrin+imidacloprid, ziram, thiocyclam and chlorpyrifos) revealed differences between available EC<sub>50</sub> for active ingredients (a.i.) and their respective formulations toward D. magna; on the contrary, no information could be retrieved from scientific literature for comparison in the case of L. sativa. In general, acute toxicity was higher toward D. magna than L. sativa. Moreover, interactions could not be determined on L. sativa, as the chlorothalonil formulation was not toxic at high levels and the concentration-response to propineb could not be fitted to obtain an IC<sub>50</sub> value. The commercial formulation composed of deltamethrin+imidacloprid followed the concentration addition model (when compared with parameters retrieved from individual a.i.) and the other three mixtures evaluated (I: chlorothalonil-propineb-deltamethrin+imidacloprid; II: chlorothalonil-propineb-ziram-thiocyclam; III: chlorothalonil-propineb-chlorpyrifos) produced an antagonistic effect on D. magna, thus suggesting less acute toxicity than their individual components. Subsequent chronic studies showed that one of the most toxic mixtures (II) negatively affected D. magna reproduction at sublethal concentrations indicating that this mixture poses a risk to this species if these pesticides co-exist in freshwater systems. These findings provide useful data to better estimate the impact of real agricultural practices related to the use of agrochemicals.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":"32 3","pages":"383-393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-023-02648-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite their environmental implications, ecotoxicological information regarding pesticide mixtures is relatively scarce. This study aimed to determine the ecotoxicity of individual pesticide formulations and their mixtures (insecticides and fungicides), which are applied during the production cycle of potato, according to agricultural practices from a Latin American region in Costa Rica. Two benchmark organisms were employed: Daphnia magna and Lactuca sativa. First, the evaluation of individual formulations (chlorothalonil, propineb, deltamethrin+imidacloprid, ziram, thiocyclam and chlorpyrifos) revealed differences between available EC50 for active ingredients (a.i.) and their respective formulations toward D. magna; on the contrary, no information could be retrieved from scientific literature for comparison in the case of L. sativa. In general, acute toxicity was higher toward D. magna than L. sativa. Moreover, interactions could not be determined on L. sativa, as the chlorothalonil formulation was not toxic at high levels and the concentration-response to propineb could not be fitted to obtain an IC50 value. The commercial formulation composed of deltamethrin+imidacloprid followed the concentration addition model (when compared with parameters retrieved from individual a.i.) and the other three mixtures evaluated (I: chlorothalonil-propineb-deltamethrin+imidacloprid; II: chlorothalonil-propineb-ziram-thiocyclam; III: chlorothalonil-propineb-chlorpyrifos) produced an antagonistic effect on D. magna, thus suggesting less acute toxicity than their individual components. Subsequent chronic studies showed that one of the most toxic mixtures (II) negatively affected D. magna reproduction at sublethal concentrations indicating that this mixture poses a risk to this species if these pesticides co-exist in freshwater systems. These findings provide useful data to better estimate the impact of real agricultural practices related to the use of agrochemicals.

农药配方及其混合物的生态毒性:哥斯达黎加马铃薯作物的案例。
尽管它们对环境有影响,但关于农药混合物的生态毒理学信息相对较少。本研究旨在根据哥斯达黎加拉丁美洲地区的农业实践,确定马铃薯生产周期中使用的个别农药配方及其混合物(杀虫剂和杀菌剂)的生态毒性。采用两种基准生物:大水蚤(Daphnia magna)和油菜(Lactuca sativa)。首先,对百菌清、丙泊尼、溴氰菊酯+吡虫啉、锆兰、硫环虫和毒死蜱等单个制剂的评价揭示了有效成分(a.i)的有效EC50与其各自制剂对大蠊的有效EC50之间的差异;相反,没有从科学文献中检索到任何信息来进行比较。一般情况下,对大蠊的急性毒性高于芥蓝。此外,由于百菌清制剂在高剂量下没有毒性,并且对丙泊尼的浓度响应无法拟合以获得IC50值,因此无法确定对L. sativa的相互作用。由溴氰菊酯+吡虫啉组成的商业配方遵循浓度加成模型(与从单个a.i中检索的参数进行比较),并对其他三种混合物进行了评估(1:百菌清-丙胺-溴氰菊酯+吡虫啉;二:chlorothalonil-propineb-ziram-thiocyclam;III:百菌清-丙氨酸-毒死蜱)对大蠊产生拮抗作用,因此表明其急性毒性比其单个成分小。随后的长期研究表明,毒性最大的一种混合物(II)在亚致死浓度时对大蠊的繁殖产生负面影响,表明如果这些农药在淡水系统中共存,这种混合物对该物种构成风险。这些发现为更好地估计与使用农用化学品有关的实际农业做法的影响提供了有用的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecotoxicology
Ecotoxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信