Evaluation of Different Agitation Techniques on Smear Layer Formation and Dentine Erosions- An In Vitro Study.

IF 1.6 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Deepa Mereen Mathew, Archana Durvasulu, Sandhya Shanmugam, Angambakkam Rajasekaran Pradeepkumar
{"title":"Evaluation of Different Agitation Techniques on Smear Layer Formation and Dentine Erosions- An In Vitro Study.","authors":"Deepa Mereen Mathew,&nbsp;Archana Durvasulu,&nbsp;Sandhya Shanmugam,&nbsp;Angambakkam Rajasekaran Pradeepkumar","doi":"10.14744/eej.2022.55477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was performed to assess smear layer formation and erosion after final irrigation protocols with metal and non-metal tips in the apical third of root canals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty mandibular premolars were instrumented with ProTaper Gold files up to F3 and embedded in a closed silicone flask system. The teeth were subsequently cleaved and 4 sequential indentations (1 to 4 mm from the apical foramen) were prepared on the buccal root canal walls to standardize sites for environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) imaging. The samples were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath and observed under ESEM (controls), reassembled and divided into four groups (n=10 each) and subjected to different final irrigation protocols; XPF Group (XP-endo Finisher) and PUI Group (passive ultrasonic irrigation) with metal tips; EA Group (EndoActivator) and MDA Group (Manual dynamic agitation) with non-metal tips. The smear layer formation and dentine erosion were evaluated using ESEM. The data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to the control groups, XPF group had significantly increased smear layer formation at 1 and 2 mm (P<0.05). PUI group had significantly higher smear layer (P<0.05) formation at 3mm while EA and MDA groups did not present with significantly higher smear layer at all levels. Erosion was significantly higher (P<0.05) in MDA, XPF and PUI groups at all levels when compared to controls while EA group presented with significantly more erosion only at 2 and 3 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Final irrigation protocol using EA and MDA with non-metal tips did not result in significant smear layer formation. Dentine erosion was observed after all experimental irrigation protocols. (EEJ-2021-12-194).</p>","PeriodicalId":11860,"journal":{"name":"European Endodontic Journal","volume":"8 1","pages":"72-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a5/35/EEJ-8-072.PMC10098470.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/eej.2022.55477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was performed to assess smear layer formation and erosion after final irrigation protocols with metal and non-metal tips in the apical third of root canals.

Methods: Forty mandibular premolars were instrumented with ProTaper Gold files up to F3 and embedded in a closed silicone flask system. The teeth were subsequently cleaved and 4 sequential indentations (1 to 4 mm from the apical foramen) were prepared on the buccal root canal walls to standardize sites for environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) imaging. The samples were cleaned in an ultrasonic bath and observed under ESEM (controls), reassembled and divided into four groups (n=10 each) and subjected to different final irrigation protocols; XPF Group (XP-endo Finisher) and PUI Group (passive ultrasonic irrigation) with metal tips; EA Group (EndoActivator) and MDA Group (Manual dynamic agitation) with non-metal tips. The smear layer formation and dentine erosion were evaluated using ESEM. The data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction.

Results: In comparison to the control groups, XPF group had significantly increased smear layer formation at 1 and 2 mm (P<0.05). PUI group had significantly higher smear layer (P<0.05) formation at 3mm while EA and MDA groups did not present with significantly higher smear layer at all levels. Erosion was significantly higher (P<0.05) in MDA, XPF and PUI groups at all levels when compared to controls while EA group presented with significantly more erosion only at 2 and 3 mm.

Conclusion: Final irrigation protocol using EA and MDA with non-metal tips did not result in significant smear layer formation. Dentine erosion was observed after all experimental irrigation protocols. (EEJ-2021-12-194).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同搅拌技术对牙本质侵蚀和涂抹层形成的影响-体外研究。
目的:本研究评估金属和非金属尖端在根管顶端三分之一的最终灌溉方案后涂片层的形成和侵蚀。方法:用ProTaper金锉对40颗下颌前磨牙进行F3深度的内嵌,并置入封闭硅胶烧瓶系统中。随后将牙齿切开,并在颊根管壁上制备4个顺序的凹痕(距根尖孔1至4mm),以标准化环境扫描电子显微镜(ESEM)成像的位置。样品在超声浴中清洗,在ESEM下观察(对照组),重新组装并分为四组(每组n=10),并进行不同的最终冲洗方案;XPF组(XP-endo Finisher)和PUI组(被动超声冲洗),金属尖端;EA组(EndoActivator)和MDA组(手动动态搅拌)采用非金属针尖。用ESEM评价涂层形成和牙本质侵蚀情况。数据分析采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,Bonferroni校正。结果:与对照组相比,XPF组在1和2 mm处明显增加了涂片层的形成(p)。结论:最终使用EA和MDA与非金属尖端的冲洗方案没有导致明显的涂片层的形成。在所有实验冲洗方案后观察牙本质侵蚀。(eej - 2021 - 12 - 194)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Endodontic Journal
European Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.60%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信