The psychometric properties of a novel task-based dance self-efficacy measure for older adult dance program participants.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Martha Waugh, Anne C Grunseit, Erin Mathieu, Dafna Merom
{"title":"The psychometric properties of a novel task-based dance self-efficacy measure for older adult dance program participants.","authors":"Martha Waugh,&nbsp;Anne C Grunseit,&nbsp;Erin Mathieu,&nbsp;Dafna Merom","doi":"10.1080/17533015.2021.1968446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-efficacy for dance may reflect individual differences in factors likely to influence dance program participation. This study investigated the psychometric properties of six novel task-based dance self-efficacy (t-bDSE) questions for older adults participating in two large-scale dance intervention trials (N<sub>1</sub> = 530; N<sub>2</sub> = 131).</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Internal consistency of t-bDSE was assessed and items validated according to age, gender, physical ability, cognitive status, psychosocial wellbeing, dance experience and exercise behaviour. Responsiveness of t-bDSE was investigated by comparing dance program participants to control groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = .88). Dance self-efficacy was weaker in participantswith less dance experience, poorer mental health, poorer cognitive and physical abilities, and insufficiently active. t-bDSE scores improved in aged-care trial participants (ηp<sup>2</sup> = .05, a moderate effect).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dance self-efficacy measure demonstrated good criterion and construct validity and can be included in future dance interventions to improve understanding of outcome variability and inform program evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":45944,"journal":{"name":"Arts & Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"33-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17533015.2021.1968446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-efficacy for dance may reflect individual differences in factors likely to influence dance program participation. This study investigated the psychometric properties of six novel task-based dance self-efficacy (t-bDSE) questions for older adults participating in two large-scale dance intervention trials (N1 = 530; N2 = 131).

Methodology: Internal consistency of t-bDSE was assessed and items validated according to age, gender, physical ability, cognitive status, psychosocial wellbeing, dance experience and exercise behaviour. Responsiveness of t-bDSE was investigated by comparing dance program participants to control groups.

Results: Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α = .88). Dance self-efficacy was weaker in participantswith less dance experience, poorer mental health, poorer cognitive and physical abilities, and insufficiently active. t-bDSE scores improved in aged-care trial participants (ηp2 = .05, a moderate effect).

Conclusions: The dance self-efficacy measure demonstrated good criterion and construct validity and can be included in future dance interventions to improve understanding of outcome variability and inform program evaluation.

一种新的基于任务的舞蹈自我效能测量的心理测量特性。
背景:舞蹈自我效能感可能反映了影响舞蹈项目参与的因素的个体差异。本研究对参加两项大型舞蹈干预试验的老年人进行了6个新的任务型舞蹈自我效能(t-bDSE)问题的心理测量特征调查(N1 = 530;n2 = 131)。方法:对t-bDSE的内部一致性进行评估,并根据年龄、性别、体能、认知状况、心理社会健康、舞蹈经历和运动行为对项目进行验证。通过比较舞蹈项目参与者和对照组来研究t-bDSE的反应性。结果:内部一致性高(Cronbach’s α = 0.88)。舞蹈经验较少、心理健康状况较差、认知和身体能力较差、运动不足的参与者的舞蹈自我效能感较弱。老年护理试验参与者的t-bDSE评分改善(ηp2 = 0.05,中等效果)。结论:舞蹈自我效能测量具有良好的标准和结构效度,可以纳入未来的舞蹈干预措施,以提高对结果变异性的理解,并为项目评估提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arts & Health
Arts & Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信