A peer veteran approach to the caring letters suicide prevention program: Preliminary data.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-13 DOI:10.1037/ser0000760
Whitney S Livingston, Sarah P Carter, Rebecca Leitner, Andrew T Ton, Heather Gebhardt, Lori A Zoellner, Natalie Mizik, Sasha M Rojas, Jonathan R Buchholz, Mark A Reger
{"title":"A peer veteran approach to the caring letters suicide prevention program: Preliminary data.","authors":"Whitney S Livingston, Sarah P Carter, Rebecca Leitner, Andrew T Ton, Heather Gebhardt, Lori A Zoellner, Natalie Mizik, Sasha M Rojas, Jonathan R Buchholz, Mark A Reger","doi":"10.1037/ser0000760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caring Letters is a prevention program aimed at reducing suicide risk; however, clinical trials indicate mixed results among military and veteran samples. The present study aimed to pilot a new version of the Caring Letters intervention that was adapted to military culture in order to emphasize peer support. The supportive letters, traditionally sent from clinicians, were written by peer veterans (PVs) who volunteered from local Veteran Service Organizations (VSOs). PVs (<i>n</i> = 15) attended a 4-hr workshop to learn about Caring Letters and write six letters to a veteran with a recent hospitalization for suicide risk (hospitalized veterans [HVs]; <i>n</i> = 15 completed a baseline assessment). Letters from PVs were sent to HVs once a month for 6 months following discharge from the psychiatric inpatient unit. The study used a limited efficacy approach to examine feasibility outcomes including implementation procedures, participant recruitment and retention rates, and barriers and facilitators. Acceptability measures examined HV satisfaction, perceived privacy and safety, and PV workshop satisfaction. Among HVs, results suggested that suicidal ideation improved from baseline to follow-up (<i>g</i> = 3.19). Results suggested resilience scores improved among HVs (<i>g</i> = 0.99). Results also suggested a possible reduction in stigma associated with mental health treatment among PVs at 1-month postworkshop assessment. Interpretation of the results is limited by the design and sample size, but the results provide preliminary support for the feasibility and acceptability of a PV approach to Caring Letters. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Caring Letters is a prevention program aimed at reducing suicide risk; however, clinical trials indicate mixed results among military and veteran samples. The present study aimed to pilot a new version of the Caring Letters intervention that was adapted to military culture in order to emphasize peer support. The supportive letters, traditionally sent from clinicians, were written by peer veterans (PVs) who volunteered from local Veteran Service Organizations (VSOs). PVs (n = 15) attended a 4-hr workshop to learn about Caring Letters and write six letters to a veteran with a recent hospitalization for suicide risk (hospitalized veterans [HVs]; n = 15 completed a baseline assessment). Letters from PVs were sent to HVs once a month for 6 months following discharge from the psychiatric inpatient unit. The study used a limited efficacy approach to examine feasibility outcomes including implementation procedures, participant recruitment and retention rates, and barriers and facilitators. Acceptability measures examined HV satisfaction, perceived privacy and safety, and PV workshop satisfaction. Among HVs, results suggested that suicidal ideation improved from baseline to follow-up (g = 3.19). Results suggested resilience scores improved among HVs (g = 0.99). Results also suggested a possible reduction in stigma associated with mental health treatment among PVs at 1-month postworkshop assessment. Interpretation of the results is limited by the design and sample size, but the results provide preliminary support for the feasibility and acceptability of a PV approach to Caring Letters. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

在 "关怀信 "自杀预防计划中采用同伴老兵方法:初步数据。
关怀信件 "是一项旨在降低自杀风险的预防计划;然而,临床试验表明,在军人和退伍军人样本中取得的结果参差不齐。本研究旨在试行新版 "关怀信 "干预措施,该措施根据军队文化进行了调整,以强调同伴支持。传统上由临床医生发送的支持信由当地退伍军人服务组织(VSOs)的退伍军人同伴(PVs)自愿撰写。同伴退伍军人(n = 15)参加了一个为期 4 小时的研讨会,学习了关爱信件的相关知识,并给最近因自杀风险住院的退伍军人(住院退伍军人 [HVs];n = 15 完成了基线评估)写了六封信。从精神病住院部出院后的 6 个月内,PV 每月给 HV 写一封信。该研究采用了有限疗效的方法来检验可行性结果,包括实施程序、参与者招募和保留率以及障碍和促进因素。可接受性测量考察了高危人群的满意度、感知到的隐私和安全以及 PV 工作坊的满意度。结果表明,从基线到随访期间,高危人群的自杀倾向有所改善(g = 3.19)。结果表明,HV 的复原力得分有所提高(g = 0.99)。结果还表明,在工作坊结束后 1 个月的评估中,与心理健康治疗相关的耻辱感在自愿者中可能有所减少。对结果的解释受到了设计和样本量的限制,但这些结果初步证明了 "关爱字母 "的 PV 方法的可行性和可接受性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信