Neoplastic Progression in Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm of the Bile Duct.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Yoh Zen, Masayuki Akita
{"title":"Neoplastic Progression in Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm of the Bile Duct.","authors":"Yoh Zen, Masayuki Akita","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2022-0407-RA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) is classified into types 1 and 2 based on criteria proposed in 2019. Recent studies investigated the clinicopathologic and molecular features of IPNB, which contributed to a more detailed understanding of this undercharacterized neoplasm.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To summarize driver gene mutations, radiologic tumor evolution, and a potentially unique pattern of tumor progression in IPNB.</p><p><strong>Data sources.—: </strong>Data were derived from a literature review and personal clinical and research experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>In contrast to de novo cholangiocarcinoma, type 1 IPNB often has mutations in APC, CTNNB1, STK11, and GNAS. These molecular features are shared with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas; however, the frequencies of individual gene abnormalities differ between these 2 neoplasms. A radiologic review of sequential images suggested that type 1 IPNB is a slow-growing neoplasm, with an ∼1-cm increase in size every 2 to 3 years, and remains in a noninvasive state for many years. A similar papillary neoplasm may develop in the biliary tree years after the complete surgical resection of IPNB. The second neoplasm has the same genetic abnormalities as the first neoplasm, indicating intrabiliary implantation rather than multifocal lesions. In contrast to type 1 IPNB, most cases of type 2 IPNB have invasive malignancy at the initial presentation. Type 2 IPNB shares many clinicopathologic and molecular features with de novo cholangiocarcinoma, questioning the distinctness of this tumor entity. The molecular mechanisms underlying malignant transformation in IPNB warrant further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":8305,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"989-996"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2022-0407-RA","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct (IPNB) is classified into types 1 and 2 based on criteria proposed in 2019. Recent studies investigated the clinicopathologic and molecular features of IPNB, which contributed to a more detailed understanding of this undercharacterized neoplasm.

Objective.—: To summarize driver gene mutations, radiologic tumor evolution, and a potentially unique pattern of tumor progression in IPNB.

Data sources.—: Data were derived from a literature review and personal clinical and research experiences.

Conclusions.—: In contrast to de novo cholangiocarcinoma, type 1 IPNB often has mutations in APC, CTNNB1, STK11, and GNAS. These molecular features are shared with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas; however, the frequencies of individual gene abnormalities differ between these 2 neoplasms. A radiologic review of sequential images suggested that type 1 IPNB is a slow-growing neoplasm, with an ∼1-cm increase in size every 2 to 3 years, and remains in a noninvasive state for many years. A similar papillary neoplasm may develop in the biliary tree years after the complete surgical resection of IPNB. The second neoplasm has the same genetic abnormalities as the first neoplasm, indicating intrabiliary implantation rather than multifocal lesions. In contrast to type 1 IPNB, most cases of type 2 IPNB have invasive malignancy at the initial presentation. Type 2 IPNB shares many clinicopathologic and molecular features with de novo cholangiocarcinoma, questioning the distinctness of this tumor entity. The molecular mechanisms underlying malignant transformation in IPNB warrant further study.

胆管内导管乳头状瘤的肿瘤进展
内涵:根据 2019 年提出的标准,胆管导管内乳头状肿瘤(IPNB)分为 1 型和 2 型。最近的研究调查了 IPNB 的临床病理和分子特征,这有助于更详细地了解这种特征不足的肿瘤:总结 IPNB 的驱动基因突变、肿瘤放射学演变和潜在的独特肿瘤进展模式:数据来自文献综述以及个人临床和研究经验:与新发胆管癌不同,1 型 IPNB 常伴有 APC、CTNNB1、STK11 和 GNAS 的突变。这些分子特征与胰腺导管内乳头状粘液瘤相同;但这两种肿瘤的单个基因异常频率不同。对连续图像进行的放射学检查表明,1 型 IPNB 是一种生长缓慢的肿瘤,每 2 至 3 年体积会增大 1 厘米,并且多年来一直处于非侵袭性状态。在 IPNB 完全手术切除后数年,胆道树上可能会出现类似的乳头状肿瘤。第二种肿瘤与第一种肿瘤具有相同的基因异常,表明是胆道内种植而不是多灶性病变。与 1 型 IPNB 不同的是,大多数 2 型 IPNB 病例在初次发病时都有浸润性恶性肿瘤。2 型 IPNB 在临床病理和分子特征上与新发胆管癌有很多相似之处,这对该肿瘤实体的独特性提出了质疑。IPNB恶性转化的分子机制值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Welcome to the website of the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (APLM). This monthly, peer-reviewed journal of the College of American Pathologists offers global reach and highest measured readership among pathology journals. Published since 1926, ARCHIVES was voted in 2009 the only pathology journal among the top 100 most influential journals of the past 100 years by the BioMedical and Life Sciences Division of the Special Libraries Association. Online access to the full-text and PDF files of APLM articles is free.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信