Testing stimulus exposure time as the critical factor of increased EPN and LPP amplitudes for fearful faces during perceptual distraction tasks

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ria Vormbrock , Maximilian Bruchmann , Lucas Menne , Thomas Straube , Sebastian Schindler
{"title":"Testing stimulus exposure time as the critical factor of increased EPN and LPP amplitudes for fearful faces during perceptual distraction tasks","authors":"Ria Vormbrock ,&nbsp;Maximilian Bruchmann ,&nbsp;Lucas Menne ,&nbsp;Thomas Straube ,&nbsp;Sebastian Schindler","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2022.12.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fearful facial expressions are prioritized across different information processing stages, as evident in early, intermediate, and late components of event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Recent studies showed that, in contrast to early N170 modulations, mid-latency (Early Posterior Negativity, EPN) and late (Late Positive Potential, LPP) emotional modulations depend on the attended perceptual feature. Nevertheless, several studies reported significant differences between emotional and neutral faces for the EPN or LPP components during distraction tasks. One cause for these conflicting findings might be that when faces are presented sufficiently long, participants attend to task-irrelevant features of the faces. In this registered report, we tested whether the presentation duration of faces is the critical factor for differences between reported emotional modulations during perceptual distraction tasks. To this end, 48 participants were required to discriminate the orientation of lines overlaid onto fearful or neutral faces, while face presentation varied (100 msec, 300 msec, 1,000 msec, 2,000 msec). While participants did not need to pay attention to the faces, we observed main effects of emotion for the EPN and LPP, but no interaction between emotion and presentation duration. Of note, unregistered exploratory tests per presentation duration showed no significant EPN and LPP emotion differences during short durations (100 and 300 msec) but significant differences with longer durations. While the presentation duration seems not to be a critical factor for EPN and LPP emotion effects, future studies are needed to investigate the role of threshold effects and the applied analytic designs to explain conflicting findings in the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945222003422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Fearful facial expressions are prioritized across different information processing stages, as evident in early, intermediate, and late components of event-related brain potentials (ERPs). Recent studies showed that, in contrast to early N170 modulations, mid-latency (Early Posterior Negativity, EPN) and late (Late Positive Potential, LPP) emotional modulations depend on the attended perceptual feature. Nevertheless, several studies reported significant differences between emotional and neutral faces for the EPN or LPP components during distraction tasks. One cause for these conflicting findings might be that when faces are presented sufficiently long, participants attend to task-irrelevant features of the faces. In this registered report, we tested whether the presentation duration of faces is the critical factor for differences between reported emotional modulations during perceptual distraction tasks. To this end, 48 participants were required to discriminate the orientation of lines overlaid onto fearful or neutral faces, while face presentation varied (100 msec, 300 msec, 1,000 msec, 2,000 msec). While participants did not need to pay attention to the faces, we observed main effects of emotion for the EPN and LPP, but no interaction between emotion and presentation duration. Of note, unregistered exploratory tests per presentation duration showed no significant EPN and LPP emotion differences during short durations (100 and 300 msec) but significant differences with longer durations. While the presentation duration seems not to be a critical factor for EPN and LPP emotion effects, future studies are needed to investigate the role of threshold effects and the applied analytic designs to explain conflicting findings in the literature.

测试刺激暴露时间作为知觉分心任务中恐惧面孔EPN和LPP振幅增加的关键因素
恐惧的面部表情在不同的信息处理阶段被优先考虑,这在事件相关脑电位(ERP)的早期、中期和晚期成分中表现得很明显。最近的研究表明,与早期N170调节相反,中潜伏期(早期-后验负性,EPN)和晚期(晚期正电位,LPP)情绪调节取决于所关注的感知特征。然而,几项研究报告称,在分心任务中,情绪面孔和中性面孔在EPN或LPP成分方面存在显著差异。这些相互矛盾的发现的一个原因可能是,当人脸呈现的时间足够长时,参与者会注意到人脸的与任务无关的特征。在这份注册报告中,我们测试了面部的呈现持续时间是否是感知分心任务中所报告的情绪调节之间差异的关键因素。为此,48名参与者被要求辨别重叠在恐惧或中性脸上的线条的方向,而面部呈现方式不同(100毫秒、300毫秒、1000毫秒、2000毫秒)。虽然参与者不需要注意面部,但我们观察到情绪对EPN和LPP的主要影响,但情绪和呈现持续时间之间没有交互作用。值得注意的是,在短持续时间(100和300毫秒)内,未登记的每个演示持续时间的探索性测试没有显示出显著的EPN和LPP情绪差异,但在较长持续时间内显示出显著差异。虽然呈现持续时间似乎不是EPN和LPP情绪效应的关键因素,但未来的研究需要调查阈值效应的作用,以及应用分析设计来解释文献中相互矛盾的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信