Adaptive Regulation in a Stable Performance Environment: Trial-To-Trial Consistency in Cue Sports Performance.

IF 0.9 4区医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES

Motor Control Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1123/mc.2021-0094

Jing Wen Pan, Pui Wah Kong, John Komar

{"title":"Adaptive Regulation in a Stable Performance Environment: Trial-To-Trial Consistency in Cue Sports Performance.","authors":"Jing Wen Pan, Pui Wah Kong, John Komar","doi":"10.1123/mc.2021-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate individual trial-to-trial performance in three tests to define adaptive regulation as a key feature of expertise in nine-ball. Thirty-one male players were assigned into the low-skilled (n = 11), intermediate (n = 10), or high-skilled groups (n = 10). The power control, cue alignment, and angle tests were selected to assess participants' ability to control the power applied in shots, strike the ball straight, and understand the ball paths, respectively. Error distance and correction of error distance were identified for each shot using 2D video analysis. Results of one-way analysis of variance showed that the high-skilled group performed better in two out of the three tests than the other two groups (p = .010 for the cue alignment test; p = .002 for the angle test). However, the adaptation effect represented by the decreased error distances across trials was not observed. Pearson correlation revealed only a few significant correlations between the error distance and its correction within each participant in all tests (p < .05), and hence, the hypothesis that \"low correction happened after small error and vice versa\" is not supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":49795,"journal":{"name":"Motor Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motor Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/mc.2021-0094","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate individual trial-to-trial performance in three tests to define adaptive regulation as a key feature of expertise in nine-ball. Thirty-one male players were assigned into the low-skilled (n = 11), intermediate (n = 10), or high-skilled groups (n = 10). The power control, cue alignment, and angle tests were selected to assess participants' ability to control the power applied in shots, strike the ball straight, and understand the ball paths, respectively. Error distance and correction of error distance were identified for each shot using 2D video analysis. Results of one-way analysis of variance showed that the high-skilled group performed better in two out of the three tests than the other two groups (p = .010 for the cue alignment test; p = .002 for the angle test). However, the adaptation effect represented by the decreased error distances across trials was not observed. Pearson correlation revealed only a few significant correlations between the error distance and its correction within each participant in all tests (p < .05), and hence, the hypothesis that "low correction happened after small error and vice versa" is not supported.

查看原文本刊更多论文

稳定表现环境中的适应性调节:球杆运动表现的试验-试验一致性。

本研究旨在调查个体在三个测试中的表现，以定义适应性调节作为九球专业知识的关键特征。31名男性运动员被分为低技能组(n = 11)、中级组(n = 10)和高技能组(n = 10)。力量控制、球杆对准和角度测试分别用来评估参与者控制击球力量、直击球和理解球路的能力。通过二维视频分析，确定每个镜头的误差距离和误差距离的修正。单因素方差分析结果显示，高技能组在三项测试中的两项表现优于其他两组(线索对齐测试p = 0.010;角度试验P = 0.002)。然而，没有观察到由试验间误差距离减小所代表的适应效应。Pearson相关分析显示，在所有测试中，每个被试的误差距离与其修正量之间只有少数显著相关(p < 0.05)，因此，“小误差后低修正，反之亦然”的假设不成立。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Motor Control 医学-神经科学

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

9.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Motor Control (MC), a peer-reviewed journal, provides a multidisciplinary examination of human movement across the lifespan. To keep you abreast of current developments in the field of motor control, it offers timely coverage of important topics, including issues related to motor disorders. This international journal publishes many types of research papers, from clinical experimental to modeling and theoretical studies. These papers come from such varied disciplines as biomechanics, kinesiology, neurophysiology, neuroscience, psychology, physical medicine, and rehabilitation. Motor Control, the official journal of the International Society of Motor Control, is designed to provide a multidisciplinary forum for the exchange of scientific information on the control of human movement across the lifespan, including issues related to motor disorders. Motor Control encourages submission of papers from a variety of disciplines including, but not limited to, biomechanics, kinesiology, neurophysiology, neuroscience, psychology, physical medicine, and rehabilitation. This peer-reviewed journal publishes a wide variety of types of research papers including clinical experimental, modeling, and theoretical studies. To be considered for publication, papers should clearly demonstrate a contribution to the understanding of control of movement. In addition to publishing research papers, Motor Control publishes review articles, quick communications, commentaries, target articles, and book reviews. When warranted, an entire issue may be devoted to a specific topic within the area of motor control.