Admissions Interviews: How History Can Pave the Way Toward a Holistic Future in Military PA Program Admissions and Hiring.

Anne Wildermuth
{"title":"Admissions Interviews: How History Can Pave the Way Toward a Holistic Future in Military PA Program Admissions and Hiring.","authors":"Anne Wildermuth","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Admissions processes for graduate health professions, including physician assistant (PA) and medical school, were built over time through trial and error. Admissions process research was not common until the early 1990s, and it seemingly began because the system of admitting applicants solely on the basis of the highest academic metrics resulted in unacceptable attrition rates. Recognizing interpersonal attributes were unique from academic metrics and critical to success in medical education, admissions interviews were added as a component of the admissions process and have since become nearly ubiquitous for medical and PA applicants. Understanding the history of admissions interviews informs ways to optimize admissions processes for the future. The PA profession was originally comprised entirely of military veterans with extensive medical training during their service; the number of service members and veterans matriculating has significantly decreased and is not reflective of the percentage of veterans in the US. Most PA programs receive applications in excess of available seats; yet, based on the 2019 PAEA Curriculum Report, the all-cause attrition rate is 7.4%. Given the large pool of applicants available to select from, it is valuable to identify students who will succeed and graduate. This is especially critical for the Interservice Physician Assistant Program, the US Military's PA program, to optimize force readiness by ensuring sufficient PAs are available. Utilizing a holistic admissions process, considered best practice in admissions, is an evidence-based way to decrease attrition and support increased diversity, including increasing the number of veterans becoming PAs, by considering the breadth of an applicant's life experiences, personal attributes, and academic metrics. The outcomes of admissions interviews are high-stakes for the program and applicants, as they are often the final step prior to admissions decisions. Additionally, there is considerable overlap between the principles of admissions interviews and job interviews, the latter of which may occur as a military PA's career unfolds and they are considered for special assignments. Though numerous different interview modalities exist, multiple mini-interviews (MMI) are highly-structured, effective, and are supportive of a holistic admissions approach. Through examining historical admissions trends, identifying a modern way to select applicants through holistic admissions can support decreased student deceleration and attrition and increased diversity, optimizing force readiness and supporting the success of the PA profession into the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":74148,"journal":{"name":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical journal (Fort Sam Houston, Tex.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Admissions processes for graduate health professions, including physician assistant (PA) and medical school, were built over time through trial and error. Admissions process research was not common until the early 1990s, and it seemingly began because the system of admitting applicants solely on the basis of the highest academic metrics resulted in unacceptable attrition rates. Recognizing interpersonal attributes were unique from academic metrics and critical to success in medical education, admissions interviews were added as a component of the admissions process and have since become nearly ubiquitous for medical and PA applicants. Understanding the history of admissions interviews informs ways to optimize admissions processes for the future. The PA profession was originally comprised entirely of military veterans with extensive medical training during their service; the number of service members and veterans matriculating has significantly decreased and is not reflective of the percentage of veterans in the US. Most PA programs receive applications in excess of available seats; yet, based on the 2019 PAEA Curriculum Report, the all-cause attrition rate is 7.4%. Given the large pool of applicants available to select from, it is valuable to identify students who will succeed and graduate. This is especially critical for the Interservice Physician Assistant Program, the US Military's PA program, to optimize force readiness by ensuring sufficient PAs are available. Utilizing a holistic admissions process, considered best practice in admissions, is an evidence-based way to decrease attrition and support increased diversity, including increasing the number of veterans becoming PAs, by considering the breadth of an applicant's life experiences, personal attributes, and academic metrics. The outcomes of admissions interviews are high-stakes for the program and applicants, as they are often the final step prior to admissions decisions. Additionally, there is considerable overlap between the principles of admissions interviews and job interviews, the latter of which may occur as a military PA's career unfolds and they are considered for special assignments. Though numerous different interview modalities exist, multiple mini-interviews (MMI) are highly-structured, effective, and are supportive of a holistic admissions approach. Through examining historical admissions trends, identifying a modern way to select applicants through holistic admissions can support decreased student deceleration and attrition and increased diversity, optimizing force readiness and supporting the success of the PA profession into the future.

招生面试:历史如何为军事PA项目招生和招聘的整体未来铺平道路。
包括医师助理(PA)和医学院在内的卫生专业研究生的录取程序,是经过长期的试错而建立起来的。直到20世纪90年代初,对招生过程的研究才开始普及,它的出现似乎是因为仅仅根据最高的学术指标录取申请人的制度导致了不可接受的流失率。认识到人际关系属性与学术指标不同,对医学教育的成功至关重要,招生面试被增加为招生过程的一个组成部分,从此成为医学和研究生申请者几乎无处不在的地方。了解招生面试的历史有助于优化未来的招生过程。私人助理职业最初完全由退伍军人组成,在服役期间接受过广泛的医疗培训;服役人员和退伍军人的入学人数大幅减少,这并不能反映美国退伍军人的比例。大多数PA项目收到的申请超过了可用座位;然而,根据2019年PAEA课程报告,全因流失率为7.4%。考虑到有大量的申请者可供选择,确定哪些学生会成功并毕业是很有价值的。这对于跨军种医师助理项目(美国军方的PA项目)来说尤其重要,通过确保足够的PA可用来优化部队战备状态。通过考虑申请人的生活经历、个人属性和学术指标的广度,利用整体招生过程被认为是招生中的最佳实践,是一种以证据为基础的方法,可以减少人员流失,支持增加多样性,包括增加退伍军人成为助理的数量。招生面试的结果对项目和申请人来说都是至关重要的,因为面试通常是录取决定之前的最后一步。此外,在招生面试和工作面试的原则之间有相当大的重叠,后者可能发生在军事助理的职业生涯展开时,他们被认为是特殊任务。虽然存在许多不同的面试方式,但多个迷你面试(MMI)是高度结构化的,有效的,并且支持整体录取方法。通过研究历史招生趋势,确定一种通过整体招生来选择申请人的现代方式,可以减少学生的减速和流失,增加多样性,优化部队准备,并支持私人助理职业在未来的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信