A cultural neuropsychological approach to harmonization of cognitive data across culturally and linguistically diverse older adult populations.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-28 DOI:10.1037/neu0000816
Emily M Briceño, Miguel Arce Rentería, Alden L Gross, Richard N Jones, Christopher Gonzalez, Rebeca Wong, David R Weir, Kenneth M Langa, Jennifer J Manly
{"title":"A cultural neuropsychological approach to harmonization of cognitive data across culturally and linguistically diverse older adult populations.","authors":"Emily M Briceño, Miguel Arce Rentería, Alden L Gross, Richard N Jones, Christopher Gonzalez, Rebeca Wong, David R Weir, Kenneth M Langa, Jennifer J Manly","doi":"10.1037/neu0000816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe a cultural neuropsychological approach to prestatistical harmonization of cognitive data across the United States (U.S.) and Mexico with the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We performed a comprehensive review of the administration, scoring, and coding procedures for each cognitive test item administered across the English and Spanish versions of the HCAP in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) in the U.S. and the Ancillary Study on Cognitive Aging in Mexico (Mex-Cog). For items that were potentially equivalent across studies, we compared each cognitive test item for linguistic and cultural equivalence and classified items as confident or tentative linking items, based on the degree of confidence in their comparability across cohorts and language groups. We evaluated these classifications using differential item functioning techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We evaluated 132 test items among 21 cognitive instruments in the HCAP across the HRS and Mex-Cog. We identified 72 confident linking items, 46 tentative linking items, and 14 items that were not comparable across cohorts. Measurement invariance analysis revealed that 64% of the confident linking items and 83% of the tentative linking items showed statistical evidence of measurement differences across cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prestatistical harmonization of cognitive data, performed by a multidisciplinary and multilingual team including cultural neuropsychologists, can identify differences in cognitive construct measurement across languages and cultures that may not be identified by statistical procedures alone. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":"37 3","pages":"247-257"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9639608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe a cultural neuropsychological approach to prestatistical harmonization of cognitive data across the United States (U.S.) and Mexico with the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP).

Method: We performed a comprehensive review of the administration, scoring, and coding procedures for each cognitive test item administered across the English and Spanish versions of the HCAP in the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) in the U.S. and the Ancillary Study on Cognitive Aging in Mexico (Mex-Cog). For items that were potentially equivalent across studies, we compared each cognitive test item for linguistic and cultural equivalence and classified items as confident or tentative linking items, based on the degree of confidence in their comparability across cohorts and language groups. We evaluated these classifications using differential item functioning techniques.

Results: We evaluated 132 test items among 21 cognitive instruments in the HCAP across the HRS and Mex-Cog. We identified 72 confident linking items, 46 tentative linking items, and 14 items that were not comparable across cohorts. Measurement invariance analysis revealed that 64% of the confident linking items and 83% of the tentative linking items showed statistical evidence of measurement differences across cohorts.

Conclusions: Prestatistical harmonization of cognitive data, performed by a multidisciplinary and multilingual team including cultural neuropsychologists, can identify differences in cognitive construct measurement across languages and cultures that may not be identified by statistical procedures alone. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

一种文化神经心理学方法来协调跨文化和语言多样化的老年人口的认知数据。
目的:描述一种文化神经心理学方法,通过统一认知评估协议(HCAP)对美国和墨西哥的认知数据进行统计前协调。方法:我们对美国健康与退休研究(HRS)和墨西哥认知衰老辅助研究(Mex-Cog)中HCAP的英语和西班牙语版本的每个认知测试项目的管理、评分和编码程序进行了全面的回顾。对于跨研究可能等同的项目,我们比较了每个认知测试项目的语言和文化等效性,并根据对其跨队列和语言群体可比性的信心程度将项目分类为自信或试探性链接项目。我们使用差异项目功能技术评估这些分类。结果:我们评估了HCAP中21个认知工具中的132个测试项目,包括HRS和Mex-Cog。我们确定了72个可靠的联系项目,46个暂定的联系项目和14个在队列间不具有可比性的项目。测量不变性分析显示,64%的自信连接项目和83%的试探性连接项目显示出跨队列测量差异的统计证据。结论:由包括文化神经心理学家在内的多学科和多语言团队进行的认知数据的统计前协调可以识别跨语言和文化的认知结构测量差异,这些差异可能无法通过统计程序单独识别。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信