Otago Exercise Program Plus Cognitive Dual-task can Reduce Fall Risk, Improve Cognition and Functioning in Older Adults.

Q3 Medicine
Paula Clara Santos, Dalmo Roberto Lopes Machado, Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla, Claúdia Vanessa Santos, Sofia Lopes, Anabela Correia Martins, Jorge Mota, Cristina Mesquita
{"title":"Otago Exercise Program Plus Cognitive Dual-task can Reduce Fall Risk, Improve Cognition and Functioning in Older Adults.","authors":"Paula Clara Santos,&nbsp;Dalmo Roberto Lopes Machado,&nbsp;Pedro Pugliesi Abdalla,&nbsp;Claúdia Vanessa Santos,&nbsp;Sofia Lopes,&nbsp;Anabela Correia Martins,&nbsp;Jorge Mota,&nbsp;Cristina Mesquita","doi":"10.2174/1874609815666220827143753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of falling increases with neuromusculoskeletal and cognitive changes resulting from aging. Physical exercise shows beneficial effects on the risk of falling, but the results are unknown when associated with cognitive activity dual-task (DT).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of the study was to evaluate the impacts of the Otago Exercise Program (OEP) plus DT cognitive activity on the risk of falling in older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>36 older adults (83.5 ± 5.7 years) participated in a quasi-experimental study, distributed in two experimental groups and a control group: 1) OEP (OEPG; n=12), 2) OEP plus DT (OEPDTG; n = 12), and a control group (CG; n=12). Older adults were evaluated at pre- and post- 12 weeks of intervention. The thresholds for the risk of falling were considered as multiparameter scores of the 10 Meter Walking Test (10MWT), evocative 10MWT, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Sit to Stand Test (STS), and The Four-Stage Balance Test (Four-Stage), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), to test the cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, all groups were homogeneous. Post-intervention, the experimental groups presented significant functional differences, in comparison to the CG, for 10MWT (OEPDTG: p= 0.002; OEPG: p= 0.002); evocative 10MWT (OEPDTG: p=0.001; OEPG: p=0.001); TUG (OEPDTG: p=0.034); STS (OEPDTG: p<0.001; OEPG: p<0.001) and cognitive for MoCA (OEPDTG: p<0.019). Significant intra-group differences (pre-post) were observed in all intervention groups, but none in CG. The risk of falling (Four-Stage) in experimental groups (OEPDTG: 33.3%; OEPG: 41.7%) was considerably lower than CG (83.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Otago Exercise Program alone can reduce the risk of falling due to improved functionality, but adding the dual task also improves cognitive capacity in older adults. The clinical significance of these interventions goes beyond statistics.</p>","PeriodicalId":11008,"journal":{"name":"Current aging science","volume":"16 1","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current aging science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874609815666220827143753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The risk of falling increases with neuromusculoskeletal and cognitive changes resulting from aging. Physical exercise shows beneficial effects on the risk of falling, but the results are unknown when associated with cognitive activity dual-task (DT).

Objective: The objective of the study was to evaluate the impacts of the Otago Exercise Program (OEP) plus DT cognitive activity on the risk of falling in older adults.

Methods: 36 older adults (83.5 ± 5.7 years) participated in a quasi-experimental study, distributed in two experimental groups and a control group: 1) OEP (OEPG; n=12), 2) OEP plus DT (OEPDTG; n = 12), and a control group (CG; n=12). Older adults were evaluated at pre- and post- 12 weeks of intervention. The thresholds for the risk of falling were considered as multiparameter scores of the 10 Meter Walking Test (10MWT), evocative 10MWT, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Sit to Stand Test (STS), and The Four-Stage Balance Test (Four-Stage), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), to test the cognitive impairment.

Results: At baseline, all groups were homogeneous. Post-intervention, the experimental groups presented significant functional differences, in comparison to the CG, for 10MWT (OEPDTG: p= 0.002; OEPG: p= 0.002); evocative 10MWT (OEPDTG: p=0.001; OEPG: p=0.001); TUG (OEPDTG: p=0.034); STS (OEPDTG: p<0.001; OEPG: p<0.001) and cognitive for MoCA (OEPDTG: p<0.019). Significant intra-group differences (pre-post) were observed in all intervention groups, but none in CG. The risk of falling (Four-Stage) in experimental groups (OEPDTG: 33.3%; OEPG: 41.7%) was considerably lower than CG (83.3%).

Conclusion: Otago Exercise Program alone can reduce the risk of falling due to improved functionality, but adding the dual task also improves cognitive capacity in older adults. The clinical significance of these interventions goes beyond statistics.

奥塔哥运动计划加上认知双重任务可以减少跌倒风险,改善老年人的认知和功能。
背景:随着衰老导致的神经、肌肉、骨骼和认知变化,跌倒的风险增加。体育锻炼显示出对跌倒风险的有益影响,但当与认知活动双任务(DT)相关时,结果尚不清楚。目的:本研究的目的是评估奥塔哥运动计划(OEP)加DT认知活动对老年人跌倒风险的影响。方法:36例老年人(83.5±5.7岁)参加准实验研究,分为两个实验组和对照组:1)OEP (OEPG;n=12), 2) OEP + DT (OEPDTG;n = 12),对照组(CG;n = 12)。在干预前和干预后12周对老年人进行评估。跌倒风险阈值采用10米步行测试(10MWT)、唤醒性10MWT、计时起走测试(TUG)、坐立测试(STS)和四阶段平衡测试(四阶段)的多参数得分和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)来测试认知障碍。结果:在基线时,所有组均为均匀性。干预后,实验组与CG相比,10MWT出现显著的功能差异(OEPDTG: p= 0.002;OEPG: p= 0.002);令人回味的10MWT (OEPDTG: p=0.001;OEPG: p = 0.001);TUG (OEPDTG: p=0.034);结论:奥塔哥运动计划可以通过改善老年人的功能来降低跌倒的风险,但增加双重任务也可以提高老年人的认知能力。这些干预措施的临床意义超越了统计学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current aging science
Current aging science Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信