A comprehensive classification for impacted cuspids and bicuspids with a proposal for Difficulty Index Categorization: a single center evaluation of 4165 cases.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the current study was to propose a classification of impacted cuspids, and bicuspids based on their spatial position in the maxillary and mandibular arches and their radiological appearance.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted including all the patients who reported to our center for extractions, orthodontic treatment, missing permanent cuspids/bicuspids, removal of third molar teeth. All patients who reported within a time frame of 6 months were enrolled in the study. Orthopantomogram was advised for all the patients as a part of diagnostic work up. The panoramic radiographs and clinical data were reviewed and patients with evidence of impacted bicuspids and cuspids were included in the study and were advised to undergo a cone beam computed tomography to evaluate the 3-dimensional position of the impacted teeth. Treatment plan was decided based on the position of the impacted teeth and feasibility for orthodontic movement. Standard surgical protocol was followed for all the patients. The duration of the procedure from the time of incision till the suturing were tabulated and the difficulty of extraction was correlated with the current Difficulty Index to validate the same.

Results: A total number of 4165 patients were enrolled in the study and based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 3680 patients were excluded and 487 patients with impacted cuspids/bicuspids were included in the study. A total number of 231 patients had impacted maxillary cuspids and bicuspids and 256 cases had impacted mandibular cuspids/bicuspids. Amongst the 256 mandibular cuspid and bicuspid that were impacted, 62% were in position C while the rest of 38% were in position B. More than ⅓ of the teeth which were in position C had transmigrated (35%). Seventy-three percent of the maxillary teeth were in position C and 69% of these teeth were either transmigrated (29%), or were horizontally (38%) placed in the alveolus or inverted (2%). The rest of the 31% were found to be either mesially inclined or vertical. The average Difficulty Index for maxillary teeth was 8 and mandibular teeth was 9. Mandibular cuspids and bicuspids in position B and C took longer time for surgical removal compared to the maxillary teeth and this was statistically significant.

Conclusions: The proposed clinical classification on impacted mandibular cuspids and bicuspids provides a structured approach to plan the treatment based on the 3-dimensional position of the teeth in the arch.