Impact of word properties on list learning: An explanatory item analysis.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-21 DOI:10.1037/neu0000810
William F Goette, Jeff Schaffert, Anne Carlew, Heidi Rossetti, Laura H Lacritz, Paul De Boeck, C Munro Cullum
{"title":"Impact of word properties on list learning: An explanatory item analysis.","authors":"William F Goette, Jeff Schaffert, Anne Carlew, Heidi Rossetti, Laura H Lacritz, Paul De Boeck, C Munro Cullum","doi":"10.1037/neu0000810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A variety of factors affect list learning performance and relatively few studies have examined the impact of word selection on these tests. This study examines the effect of both language and memory processing of individual words on list learning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Item-response data from 1,219 participants, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 74.41 (<i>SD</i> = 7.13), <i>M</i><sub>edu</sub> = 13.30 (<i>SD</i> = 2.72), in the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol were used. A Bayesian generalized (non)linear multilevel modeling framework was used to specify the measurement and explanatory item-response theory models. Explanatory effects on items due to learning over trials, serial position of words, and six word properties obtained through the English Lexicon Project were modeled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two parameter logistic (2PL) model with trial-specific learning effects produced the best measurement fit. Evidence of the serial position effect on word learning was observed. Robust positive effects on word learning were observed for body-object integration while robust negative effects were observed for word frequency, concreteness, and semantic diversity. A weak negative effect of average age of acquisition and a weak positive effect for the number of phonemes in the word were also observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results demonstrate that list learning performance depends on factors beyond the repetition of words. Identification of item factors that predict learning could extend to a range of test development problems including translation, form equating, item revision, and item bias. In data harmonization efforts, these methods can also be used to help link tests via shared item features and testing of whether these features are equally explanatory across samples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":"37 3","pages":"268-283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9911044/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A variety of factors affect list learning performance and relatively few studies have examined the impact of word selection on these tests. This study examines the effect of both language and memory processing of individual words on list learning.

Method: Item-response data from 1,219 participants, Mage = 74.41 (SD = 7.13), Medu = 13.30 (SD = 2.72), in the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol were used. A Bayesian generalized (non)linear multilevel modeling framework was used to specify the measurement and explanatory item-response theory models. Explanatory effects on items due to learning over trials, serial position of words, and six word properties obtained through the English Lexicon Project were modeled.

Results: A two parameter logistic (2PL) model with trial-specific learning effects produced the best measurement fit. Evidence of the serial position effect on word learning was observed. Robust positive effects on word learning were observed for body-object integration while robust negative effects were observed for word frequency, concreteness, and semantic diversity. A weak negative effect of average age of acquisition and a weak positive effect for the number of phonemes in the word were also observed.

Conclusions: Results demonstrate that list learning performance depends on factors beyond the repetition of words. Identification of item factors that predict learning could extend to a range of test development problems including translation, form equating, item revision, and item bias. In data harmonization efforts, these methods can also be used to help link tests via shared item features and testing of whether these features are equally explanatory across samples. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

单词属性对列表学习的影响:解释性项目分析
目的:影响列表学习成绩的因素有很多,而研究单词选择对这些测试的影响的相对较少。本研究探讨了单个单词的语言和记忆处理对列表学习的影响:方法:本研究使用了统一认知评估规程(Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol)中 1,219 名参与者(Mage = 74.41 (SD = 7.13), Medu = 13.30 (SD = 2.72))的项目反应数据。研究采用贝叶斯广义(非)线性多层次建模框架来建立测量和解释性项目-反应理论模型。通过英语词典项目获得的试验学习、单词的序列位置和六个单词属性对项目的解释性影响也被建模:具有特定试验学习效应的双参数逻辑(2PL)模型产生了最佳的测量拟合效果。观察到了序列位置对单词学习的影响。体-物整合对单词学习产生了稳健的正效应,而单词频率、具体性和语义多样性则产生了稳健的负效应。此外,还观察到平均习得年龄的微弱负效应和单词中音素数量的微弱正效应:结果表明,单词表的学习成绩取决于单词重复以外的因素。识别预测学习效果的项目因素可以扩展到一系列测试开发问题,包括翻译、形式等化、项目修订和项目偏差。在数据协调工作中,这些方法还可用于通过共同的项目特征将测试联系起来,并测试这些特征在不同样本中是否具有相同的解释力。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信