Impact of Acid ("Progressive Brush") and Alkaline Straightening on the Hair Fiber: Differential Effects on the Cuticle and Cortex Properties.

Q2 Medicine
International Journal of Trichology Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-31 DOI:10.4103/ijt.ijt_158_20
Maria Valéria Robles Velasco, Tânia Cristina de Sá-Dias, Michelli Ferrera Dario, Valcinir Bedin, Marjory Bernardes Fileto, Andressa Costa de Oliveira, Claudinéia Aparecida Sales de Oliveira Pinto, André Rolim Baby
{"title":"Impact of Acid (\"Progressive Brush\") and Alkaline Straightening on the Hair Fiber: Differential Effects on the Cuticle and Cortex Properties.","authors":"Maria Valéria Robles Velasco,&nbsp;Tânia Cristina de Sá-Dias,&nbsp;Michelli Ferrera Dario,&nbsp;Valcinir Bedin,&nbsp;Marjory Bernardes Fileto,&nbsp;Andressa Costa de Oliveira,&nbsp;Claudinéia Aparecida Sales de Oliveira Pinto,&nbsp;André Rolim Baby","doi":"10.4103/ijt.ijt_158_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glyoxylic acid has emerged as a safe alternative to formol (formaldehyde) use as a hair straightener/relaxer. However, the possible damage to the hair fiber after its application is low known and/or published in the literature.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This work aims to characterize hair locks treated with glyoxylic acid compared to traditional alkaline straighteners such as sodium and guanidine hydroxide and ammonium thioglycolate.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The morphology of the hair cuticles was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Protein loss was assessed by the Lowry method modified by Peterson and as mechanical properties that were expressed in terms of tensile strength.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All products (sodium and guanidine hydroxides and ammonium thioglycolate) caused protein loss of about 2.5 μg/g, except glyoxylic acid that caused the worst damage (3.5 μg/g), in relation to the untreated (virgin) hair (1.12 μg/g), indicating that the chemical treatments can cause hair damage in both cuticles and cortex. The force to break the fibers treated with traditional straighteners based on sodium hydroxide, guanidine hydroxide, and ammonium thioglycolate was statistically the same.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The treatment with glyoxylic acid showed rupture tensile statistically equivalent to the alkaline straighteners. The mechanism of action of glyoxylic acid does not appear to be based on breaking and rearrangement of disulfide bridges, but altered them, that influenced the hair strength. However, it is also essential to consider other factors relevant: technical application technique, reaction time, and interval of reapplication of the product, as this can change the pattern of the results obtained.</p>","PeriodicalId":14417,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Trichology","volume":"14 6","pages":"197-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Trichology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijt.ijt_158_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glyoxylic acid has emerged as a safe alternative to formol (formaldehyde) use as a hair straightener/relaxer. However, the possible damage to the hair fiber after its application is low known and/or published in the literature.

Aims: This work aims to characterize hair locks treated with glyoxylic acid compared to traditional alkaline straighteners such as sodium and guanidine hydroxide and ammonium thioglycolate.

Materials and methods: The morphology of the hair cuticles was observed by scanning electron microscopy. Protein loss was assessed by the Lowry method modified by Peterson and as mechanical properties that were expressed in terms of tensile strength.

Results: All products (sodium and guanidine hydroxides and ammonium thioglycolate) caused protein loss of about 2.5 μg/g, except glyoxylic acid that caused the worst damage (3.5 μg/g), in relation to the untreated (virgin) hair (1.12 μg/g), indicating that the chemical treatments can cause hair damage in both cuticles and cortex. The force to break the fibers treated with traditional straighteners based on sodium hydroxide, guanidine hydroxide, and ammonium thioglycolate was statistically the same.

Conclusion: The treatment with glyoxylic acid showed rupture tensile statistically equivalent to the alkaline straighteners. The mechanism of action of glyoxylic acid does not appear to be based on breaking and rearrangement of disulfide bridges, but altered them, that influenced the hair strength. However, it is also essential to consider other factors relevant: technical application technique, reaction time, and interval of reapplication of the product, as this can change the pattern of the results obtained.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

酸性(“渐进刷”)和碱性拉直对头发纤维的影响:对角质层和皮层特性的不同影响。
背景:乙醛酸已成为一种安全的替代甲醛的直发器/放松剂。然而,应用后对头发纤维可能造成的损害是鲜为人知的和/或已发表在文献中。目的:与传统的碱性直发剂(如氢氧化钠和胍)以及巯基乙酸铵相比,这项工作旨在表征用乙醛酸处理的头发。材料与方法:用扫描电镜观察毛发角质层的形态。蛋白质损失通过Peterson修改的Lowry方法进行评估,并作为以拉伸强度表示的机械性能进行评估。结果:所有产品(氢氧化钠和胍氢氧化物以及巯基乙酸铵)造成的蛋白质损失约为2.5μg/g,除了乙醛酸造成的损伤最严重(3.5μg/g),而未经处理的(原始)头发(1.12μg/g。用基于氢氧化钠、氢胍和巯基乙酸铵的传统矫直剂处理的纤维的断裂力在统计学上是相同的。结论:乙醛酸处理的断裂拉伸强度在统计学上与碱性矫直剂相当。乙醛酸的作用机制似乎不是基于二硫键的断裂和重排,而是改变了它们,从而影响了头发的强度。然而,也必须考虑其他相关因素:技术应用技术、反应时间和产品重新应用的间隔,因为这可能会改变所获得的结果模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信