Effect of growth hormone cotreatment in sub-fertile women ≥ 40 years: A Meta-analysis.

Mohamed Elkalyoubi, Larissa Schindler, Hena Zaheer
{"title":"Effect of growth hormone cotreatment in sub-fertile women ≥ 40 years: A Meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohamed Elkalyoubi, Larissa Schindler, Hena Zaheer","doi":"10.1530/RAF-22-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Treatment of sub-fertile women aged ≥ 40 years old (AMA) is challenging. Co-treatment with growth hormone (GH) is suggested to improve reproductive outcomes in poor responders. However, few studies, and with conflicting results, focused on women with AMA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative retrospective trials (CRTs) of GH cotreatment in AMA women undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic injection treatment using their autologous oocytes was performed. The search included studies published in English up to the end of 2021. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes were the number of mature and retrieved oocytes and the rate of live birth. 406 studies were found. The final analysis included three RCTs and four CRTs with 481 patients who used GH and 400 patients who did not. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the GH cotreatment group compared to the placebo as well as the group without GH co-treatment, (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.34 - 3.61 and OR 4.12; 95% CI 1.82 - 9.32, respectively). Intriguingly, the subgroup analysis showed that poor-responder patients did not benefit from co-treatment with GH. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of mature or retrieved oocytes. GH cotreatment in a subgroup of women with AMA improves clinical pregnancy and live birth per fresh embryo transfer. However, this conclusion must be taken with caution and further research is needed. The review is registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42021252618). www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.</p>","PeriodicalId":21128,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction & Fertility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/42/56/RAF-22-0107.PMC10083671.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction & Fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/RAF-22-0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Treatment of sub-fertile women aged ≥ 40 years old (AMA) is challenging. Co-treatment with growth hormone (GH) is suggested to improve reproductive outcomes in poor responders. However, few studies, and with conflicting results, focused on women with AMA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative retrospective trials (CRTs) of GH cotreatment in AMA women undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic injection treatment using their autologous oocytes was performed. The search included studies published in English up to the end of 2021. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes were the number of mature and retrieved oocytes and the rate of live birth. 406 studies were found. The final analysis included three RCTs and four CRTs with 481 patients who used GH and 400 patients who did not. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the GH cotreatment group compared to the placebo as well as the group without GH co-treatment, (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.34 - 3.61 and OR 4.12; 95% CI 1.82 - 9.32, respectively). Intriguingly, the subgroup analysis showed that poor-responder patients did not benefit from co-treatment with GH. There were no statistically significant differences in the number of mature or retrieved oocytes. GH cotreatment in a subgroup of women with AMA improves clinical pregnancy and live birth per fresh embryo transfer. However, this conclusion must be taken with caution and further research is needed. The review is registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42021252618). www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

生长激素联合治疗对≥40 岁亚健康女性的影响:一项 Meta 分析。
治疗年龄≥ 40 岁的亚健康女性(AMA)具有挑战性。有人建议,与生长激素(GH)联合治疗可改善反应不佳者的生殖结果。然而,针对 AMA 妇女的研究很少,而且结果相互矛盾。我们对使用自体卵母细胞进行体外受精或卵胞浆内注射治疗的 AMA 妇女的生长激素联合治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)和比较回顾性试验(CRT)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。检索包括截至 2021 年底发表的英文研究。主要结果是每次胚胎移植的临床妊娠率。次要结果是成熟和取出的卵母细胞数量以及活产率。共找到 406 项研究。最终分析包括三项 RCT 和四项 CRT,其中 481 名患者使用了 GH,400 名患者未使用。与安慰剂组和未使用 GH 联合治疗组相比,GH 联合治疗组的临床妊娠率和活产率明显更高(OR 2.2;95% CI 1.34 - 3.61 和 OR 4.12;95% CI 1.82 - 9.32)。耐人寻味的是,亚组分析表明,反应差的患者并不能从与 GH 的联合治疗中获益。在成熟卵母细胞数量或取回卵母细胞数量方面,没有统计学意义上的显著差异。对患有 AMA 的亚组妇女进行 GH 联合治疗可提高临床妊娠率和每次新鲜胚胎移植的活产率。但这一结论必须谨慎对待,还需要进一步研究。该综述已在 PROSPERO 数据库中注册(CRD42021252618)。www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信