Clinical Judgment and Informatics: Encoding Simulations Using the Omaha System.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Marshall Muehlbauer, Cynthia Bradley, Jenna Marquard, Karen A Monsen
{"title":"Clinical Judgment and Informatics: Encoding Simulations Using the Omaha System.","authors":"Marshall Muehlbauer,&nbsp;Cynthia Bradley,&nbsp;Jenna Marquard,&nbsp;Karen A Monsen","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20230208-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical judgment is a critical nursing competency. Unfolding case study is a pedagogy used to develop clinical judgment. The Omaha System is an accepted taxonomy for standardizing nursing documentation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An unfolding case study was developed from a simulation scenario by encoding 33 nursing interventions with the Omaha System, then developed multiple true-false response items which were sent electronically in survey format to prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students. Differences between identified essential and distractor interventions were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 101) identified correct interventions (<i>M</i> = 74.6%, standard deviation [SD] = 12%). A paired t-test indicated the percentage of correctly identified essential interventions (<i>M</i> = 78%, <i>SD</i> = 18.7%) was significantly higher than distractor interventions (<i>M</i> = 67%, <i>SD</i> = 18%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Nursing students can identify appropriate interventions using the Omaha System, demonstrating potential to extend highly effective and low-cost learning experiences using unfolding case study and multiple true-false response items. <b>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2023;62(4):237-239.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20230208-07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical judgment is a critical nursing competency. Unfolding case study is a pedagogy used to develop clinical judgment. The Omaha System is an accepted taxonomy for standardizing nursing documentation.

Method: An unfolding case study was developed from a simulation scenario by encoding 33 nursing interventions with the Omaha System, then developed multiple true-false response items which were sent electronically in survey format to prelicensure baccalaureate nursing students. Differences between identified essential and distractor interventions were evaluated.

Results: Participants (n = 101) identified correct interventions (M = 74.6%, standard deviation [SD] = 12%). A paired t-test indicated the percentage of correctly identified essential interventions (M = 78%, SD = 18.7%) was significantly higher than distractor interventions (M = 67%, SD = 18%).

Discussion: Nursing students can identify appropriate interventions using the Omaha System, demonstrating potential to extend highly effective and low-cost learning experiences using unfolding case study and multiple true-false response items. [J Nurs Educ. 2023;62(4):237-239.].

临床判断和信息学:使用奥马哈系统的编码模拟。
背景:临床判断能力是一项重要的护理能力。展开案例研究是一种用于发展临床判断的教学法。奥马哈系统是标准化护理文件的公认分类法。方法:在模拟情景的基础上,采用奥马哈系统对33项护理干预措施进行编码,形成一个展开式的案例研究,并编制多个真假回答项目,以问卷形式电子发送给护理学士学位预科生。评估确定的基本干预措施和干扰干预措施之间的差异。结果:参与者(n = 101)识别出正确的干预措施(M = 74.6%,标准差[SD] = 12%)。配对t检验显示,正确识别基本干预措施的百分比(M = 78%, SD = 18.7%)显著高于分心干预措施(M = 67%, SD = 18%)。讨论:护理专业学生可以使用奥马哈系统识别适当的干预措施,通过展开案例研究和多个真假反应项目,展示了扩展高效和低成本学习经验的潜力。[J].中国生物医学工程学报,2009;32(4):379 - 379。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信