L Floyd, L Byrne, A D Morris, A C Nixon, A Dhaygude
{"title":"The Limitations of Frailty Assessment Tools in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.","authors":"L Floyd, L Byrne, A D Morris, A C Nixon, A Dhaygude","doi":"10.14283/jfa.2023.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) can be associated with a high burden of morbidity and mortality in an ageing population. It is increasingly recognised that individualised management is needed. Few studies have looked specifically at frailty related outcomes in AAV and a gap remains in understanding the application of frailty assessment tools in these patients. We carried out a single centre, cohort study between 2017 to 2022. Forty-one patients who had newly diagnosed or relapsing AAV and aged ≥65 years were included. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score at presentation was assessed by health care practitioners and interval CFS scores were carried out a minimum of 6 weeks from diagnosis. The aim was to determine if patients living with frailty had worse outcomes or if their perceived frailty improved with immunosuppressive treatment. The median CFS at diagnosis was 4 (vulnerable) and this remained at follow up. There was no significant interval change in CFS (P=0.16) suggesting that the patients did not become frailer and instead there was a tendency towards improved frailty scores at re-assessment. There was no significant difference in end stage kidney disease between those with higher (>5) or lower (≤5) CFS (P=1.0), although crude mortality was higher among those with an initial CFS >5 (P=0.03). Overall, we demonstrated that CFS has limitations in determining patients that may be frail as a result of disease burden with the potential to improve with treatment and clinicians should be mindful of this when making decisions relating to management.</p>","PeriodicalId":51629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Frailty & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2023.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) can be associated with a high burden of morbidity and mortality in an ageing population. It is increasingly recognised that individualised management is needed. Few studies have looked specifically at frailty related outcomes in AAV and a gap remains in understanding the application of frailty assessment tools in these patients. We carried out a single centre, cohort study between 2017 to 2022. Forty-one patients who had newly diagnosed or relapsing AAV and aged ≥65 years were included. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score at presentation was assessed by health care practitioners and interval CFS scores were carried out a minimum of 6 weeks from diagnosis. The aim was to determine if patients living with frailty had worse outcomes or if their perceived frailty improved with immunosuppressive treatment. The median CFS at diagnosis was 4 (vulnerable) and this remained at follow up. There was no significant interval change in CFS (P=0.16) suggesting that the patients did not become frailer and instead there was a tendency towards improved frailty scores at re-assessment. There was no significant difference in end stage kidney disease between those with higher (>5) or lower (≤5) CFS (P=1.0), although crude mortality was higher among those with an initial CFS >5 (P=0.03). Overall, we demonstrated that CFS has limitations in determining patients that may be frail as a result of disease burden with the potential to improve with treatment and clinicians should be mindful of this when making decisions relating to management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting articles that are related to research in the area of aging and age-related (sub)clinical conditions. In particular, the journal publishes high-quality papers describing and discussing social, biological, and clinical features underlying the onset and development of frailty in older persons. The Journal of Frailty & Aging is composed by five different sections: - Biology of frailty and aging In this section, the journal presents reports from preclinical studies and experiences focused at identifying, describing, and understanding the subclinical pathophysiological mechanisms at the basis of frailty and aging. - Physical frailty and age-related body composition modifications Studies exploring the physical and functional components of frailty are contained in this section. Moreover, since body composition plays a major role in determining physical frailty and, at the same time, represents the most evident feature of the aging process, special attention is given to studies focused on sarcopenia and obesity at older age. - Neurosciences of frailty and aging The section presents results from studies exploring the cognitive and neurological aspects of frailty and age-related conditions. In particular, papers on neurodegenerative conditions of advanced age are welcomed. - Frailty and aging in clinical practice and public health This journal’s section is devoted at presenting studies on clinical issues of frailty and age-related conditions. This multidisciplinary section particularly welcomes reports from clinicians coming from different backgrounds and specialties dealing with the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of advanced age. Moreover, this part of the journal also contains reports on frailty- and age-related social and public health issues. - Clinical trials and therapeutics This final section contains all the manuscripts presenting data on (pharmacological and non-pharmacological) interventions aimed at preventing, delaying, or treating frailty and age-related conditions.The Journal of Frailty & Aging is a quarterly publication of original papers, review articles, case reports, controversies, letters to the Editor, and book reviews. Manuscripts will be evaluated by the editorial staff and, if suitable, by expert reviewers assigned by the editors. The journal particularly welcomes papers by researchers from different backgrounds and specialities who may want to share their views and experiences on the common themes of frailty and aging.The abstracting and indexing of the Journal of Frailty & Aging is covered by MEDLINE (approval by the National Library of Medicine in February 2016).