Comparation Among Opioid-Based, Low Opioid and Opioid Free Anesthesia in Colorectal Oncologic Surgery.

Marija Toleska, Aleksandar Dimitrovski, Natasha Toleska Dimitrovska
{"title":"Comparation Among Opioid-Based, Low Opioid and Opioid Free Anesthesia in Colorectal Oncologic Surgery.","authors":"Marija Toleska,&nbsp;Aleksandar Dimitrovski,&nbsp;Natasha Toleska Dimitrovska","doi":"10.2478/prilozi-2023-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: Opioids are the \"gold standard\" for pain treatment during and after colorectal surgery. They can inhibit cellular and humoral immunity and it is assumed that can promote cancer cell proliferation and metastatic spread. Adequate pain management can be achieved not only with opioids, but also with non-opioid drugs, which can be used together in small doses, i.e., multimodal analgesia, and can lower the need for opioids during and after surgery. Opioid free anesthesia (OFA) is part of multimodal analgesia, where opioids are not used in the intraoperative period. <b>Materials and methods</b>: In this prospective and randomized clinical study 60 patients scheduled for open colorectal surgery were enrolled. They were between the ages of 45 and 70 with the American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications 1, 2 and 3, divided in three groups. The first group of patients, or Opioid-based anesthesia group (OBAG), received the following for induction to anesthesia: lidocaine at 1 mg/kg, fentanyl 100 at µgr, propofol at 2mg/kg and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg. They intermittently received 50-100 µgr fentanyl intravenously and 0.25 % bupivacaine 2-3 ml every 30-45 minutes, given in the epidural catheter during surgery. The second group of patients, or Low opioid anesthesia group (LOAG), received the following for induction to anesthesia: lidocaine at 1 mg/kg, fentanyl at 100 µgr, propofol at 2mg/kg and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg. Prior to surgery, 50 µgr of fentanyl with 5 ml 0.25% bupivacaine was given into the epidural catheter, and the same dose was received at the end of surgery. The third group, or Opioid free anesthesia group (OFAG), received the following before the induction to general anesthesia: dexamethasone at 0.1 mg/kg and 1 gr of paracetamol. Induction to general anesthesia was with lidocaine at 1 mg/kg, propofol at 2mg/kg, ketamine at 0.5 mg/kg and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg. After intubation, intravenous continuous infusion with lidocaine was at 2 mg/kg/h, ketamine 0.2 mg/kg/h and magnesium 15 mg/kg/h loaded on and intermittently 0.25 % bupivacaine 2-3 ml every 30-45 minutes given in the epidural catheter during surgery. The primary goal was to measure the patients' pain after the first 72 postoperative hours in all three groups (2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours after surgery). The secondary goal was to measure the total amount of morphine given in the epidural catheter in the postoperative period in all three groups. Other secondary goals were: to compare the total amount of fentanyl given intravenously during surgery in the first and second groups, determine if there was a need to use rescue analgesia in the postoperative period, measure the occurrence of PONV, and to measure the total amount of bupivacaine given in the epidural catheter during operation in all three groups. <b>Results</b>: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score comparisons between groups showed patients from the OBA and LOA groups had significantly higher VAS scores, compared to the patients from the OFA group 2, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation. After 6 hours postoperatively, patients from the LOA group had significantly higher VAS scores, compared to patients from the OBA and OFA groups. After 36 hours postoperatively, patients from the OBA group had significantly higher VAS scores compared to patients from the LOA and OFA groups. At the last follow-up point, 72 hours after the intervention, the patients from the OBA and LOA groups had significantly higher VAS scores compared to the patients from the OFA group. All patients from the OBA and LOA groups, and only 9 from the OFA group received morphine in the postoperative period via epidural catheter. Patients from the Opioid group received significantly higher amounts of fentanyl during surgery. Additional administration of another analgesic drug in the postoperative period was prescribed in 55% of patients in the OBAG, in 50% in the LOAG and in 35% of the OFA group. PONV was registered in 60% of patients from the OBAG and in 40% of patients from the LOAG. In the OFA group did not register PONV in any of the patients. The biggest amount of bupivacaine given during surgery was in the OBAG (26.37 ± 2.6 mg), in LOAG was 25.0 ± 0 and the less in OFAG group (24.50 ± 4.3). <b>Conclusion</b>: Patients from OFA group, compared with patients from OBAG and LOAG, have the lowest pain score in first 72 hours after open colorectal surgery, received fewer opioids via an epidural catheter in the postoperative period, had less need for rescue analgesia, no occurrence of PONV, and less need for bupivacaine via an epidural catheter in the intraoperative period.</p>","PeriodicalId":74492,"journal":{"name":"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)","volume":"44 1","pages":"117-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prilozi (Makedonska akademija na naukite i umetnostite. Oddelenie za medicinski nauki)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/prilozi-2023-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Opioids are the "gold standard" for pain treatment during and after colorectal surgery. They can inhibit cellular and humoral immunity and it is assumed that can promote cancer cell proliferation and metastatic spread. Adequate pain management can be achieved not only with opioids, but also with non-opioid drugs, which can be used together in small doses, i.e., multimodal analgesia, and can lower the need for opioids during and after surgery. Opioid free anesthesia (OFA) is part of multimodal analgesia, where opioids are not used in the intraoperative period. Materials and methods: In this prospective and randomized clinical study 60 patients scheduled for open colorectal surgery were enrolled. They were between the ages of 45 and 70 with the American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classifications 1, 2 and 3, divided in three groups. The first group of patients, or Opioid-based anesthesia group (OBAG), received the following for induction to anesthesia: lidocaine at 1 mg/kg, fentanyl 100 at µgr, propofol at 2mg/kg and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg. They intermittently received 50-100 µgr fentanyl intravenously and 0.25 % bupivacaine 2-3 ml every 30-45 minutes, given in the epidural catheter during surgery. The second group of patients, or Low opioid anesthesia group (LOAG), received the following for induction to anesthesia: lidocaine at 1 mg/kg, fentanyl at 100 µgr, propofol at 2mg/kg and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg. Prior to surgery, 50 µgr of fentanyl with 5 ml 0.25% bupivacaine was given into the epidural catheter, and the same dose was received at the end of surgery. The third group, or Opioid free anesthesia group (OFAG), received the following before the induction to general anesthesia: dexamethasone at 0.1 mg/kg and 1 gr of paracetamol. Induction to general anesthesia was with lidocaine at 1 mg/kg, propofol at 2mg/kg, ketamine at 0.5 mg/kg and rocuronium bromide at 0.6 mg/kg. After intubation, intravenous continuous infusion with lidocaine was at 2 mg/kg/h, ketamine 0.2 mg/kg/h and magnesium 15 mg/kg/h loaded on and intermittently 0.25 % bupivacaine 2-3 ml every 30-45 minutes given in the epidural catheter during surgery. The primary goal was to measure the patients' pain after the first 72 postoperative hours in all three groups (2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours after surgery). The secondary goal was to measure the total amount of morphine given in the epidural catheter in the postoperative period in all three groups. Other secondary goals were: to compare the total amount of fentanyl given intravenously during surgery in the first and second groups, determine if there was a need to use rescue analgesia in the postoperative period, measure the occurrence of PONV, and to measure the total amount of bupivacaine given in the epidural catheter during operation in all three groups. Results: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score comparisons between groups showed patients from the OBA and LOA groups had significantly higher VAS scores, compared to the patients from the OFA group 2, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation. After 6 hours postoperatively, patients from the LOA group had significantly higher VAS scores, compared to patients from the OBA and OFA groups. After 36 hours postoperatively, patients from the OBA group had significantly higher VAS scores compared to patients from the LOA and OFA groups. At the last follow-up point, 72 hours after the intervention, the patients from the OBA and LOA groups had significantly higher VAS scores compared to the patients from the OFA group. All patients from the OBA and LOA groups, and only 9 from the OFA group received morphine in the postoperative period via epidural catheter. Patients from the Opioid group received significantly higher amounts of fentanyl during surgery. Additional administration of another analgesic drug in the postoperative period was prescribed in 55% of patients in the OBAG, in 50% in the LOAG and in 35% of the OFA group. PONV was registered in 60% of patients from the OBAG and in 40% of patients from the LOAG. In the OFA group did not register PONV in any of the patients. The biggest amount of bupivacaine given during surgery was in the OBAG (26.37 ± 2.6 mg), in LOAG was 25.0 ± 0 and the less in OFAG group (24.50 ± 4.3). Conclusion: Patients from OFA group, compared with patients from OBAG and LOAG, have the lowest pain score in first 72 hours after open colorectal surgery, received fewer opioids via an epidural catheter in the postoperative period, had less need for rescue analgesia, no occurrence of PONV, and less need for bupivacaine via an epidural catheter in the intraoperative period.

结直肠肿瘤手术中阿片类药物为主麻醉、低阿片类麻醉和无阿片类麻醉的比较
阿片类药物是治疗结直肠手术期间和术后疼痛的“金标准”。它们可以抑制细胞和体液免疫,并被认为可以促进癌细胞的增殖和转移扩散。充分的疼痛管理不仅可以通过阿片类药物实现,也可以通过非阿片类药物实现,它们可以小剂量一起使用,即多模式镇痛,并且可以降低手术期间和手术后对阿片类药物的需求。无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)是多模式镇痛的一部分,术中不使用阿片类药物。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性随机临床研究中,纳入了60例计划进行结肠直肠开腹手术的患者。他们的年龄在45岁到70岁之间,被美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类为1、2和3,分为三组。第一组患者,即阿片类药物麻醉组(OBAG),接受以下药物诱导麻醉:利多卡因1mg /kg,芬太尼100 μ g,异丙酚2mg/kg,罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg。他们在手术期间通过硬膜外导管间歇静脉注射50-100µg芬太尼和0.25%布比卡因2-3 ml,每30-45分钟一次。第二组患者,即低阿片类药物麻醉组(LOAG),采用以下药物诱导麻醉:利多卡因1mg /kg,芬太尼100µg,异丙酚2mg/kg,罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg。术前给予芬太尼50µg加0.25%布比卡因5 ml硬膜外导管,手术结束时给予相同剂量。第三组,即无阿片类药物麻醉组(OFAG),全麻诱导前给予:地塞米松0.1 mg/kg,扑热息痛1 g。以利多卡因1mg /kg、异丙酚2mg/kg、氯胺酮0.5 mg/kg、罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg诱导全麻。插管后,术中经硬膜外导管连续静脉输注利多卡因2 mg/kg/h,氯胺酮0.2 mg/kg/h,镁15 mg/kg/h,外加0.25%布比卡因2-3 ml,每30-45分钟间断输注。主要目的是测量三组患者术后72小时(术后2、6、12、24、36、48和72小时)的疼痛。次要目的是测量三组患者术后硬膜外导管中吗啡的总用量。其他次要目的是:比较第一组和第二组术中静脉给药芬太尼的总量,确定术后是否需要使用抢救镇痛,测量PONV的发生,测量三组术中硬膜外导管布比卡因的总量。结果:组间VAS评分比较显示,术后2、12、24、48 h, OBA组和LOA组患者VAS评分明显高于OFA组。术后6小时,LOA组患者的VAS评分明显高于OBA组和OFA组。术后36小时,OBA组患者的VAS评分明显高于LOA组和OFA组。在干预后72小时的最后一个随访点,OBA组和LOA组患者的VAS评分明显高于OFA组患者。所有的OBA组和LOA组患者术后通过硬膜外导管接受吗啡治疗,OFA组仅有9例。阿片类药物组的患者在手术期间接受了大量的芬太尼。55%的OBAG组患者、50%的LOAG组患者和35%的OFA组患者在术后额外给予另一种镇痛药物。60%的OBAG患者和40%的LOAG患者登记了PONV。在OFA组中,没有任何患者出现PONV。术中布比卡因用量以OBAG组最大(26.37±2.6 mg), LOAG组为25.0±0 mg, OFAG组最小(24.50±4.3 mg)。结论:OFA组患者与OBAG和LOAG组患者相比,结直肠开腹术后前72小时疼痛评分最低,术后经硬膜外导管使用阿片类药物较少,术中需急救镇痛较少,无PONV发生,术中经硬膜外导管布比卡因用量较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信