How to Improve Training in Descriptive Psychopathology for Psychiatry Residents: A Delphi Study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychopathology Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000525691
Jon-Inaki Etxeandia-Pradera, Jon Landeta, Jose Gonzalez-Such, Eduardo-Jesus Aguilar
{"title":"How to Improve Training in Descriptive Psychopathology for Psychiatry Residents: A Delphi Study.","authors":"Jon-Inaki Etxeandia-Pradera,&nbsp;Jon Landeta,&nbsp;Jose Gonzalez-Such,&nbsp;Eduardo-Jesus Aguilar","doi":"10.1159/000525691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Descriptive psychopathology (DP) is the language of psychiatry and is dedicated to the description of mental symptoms. Despite its core importance, a systematic review identified a series of shortcomings in its training. This Delphi study seeks to provide guidance for better didactic and clinical training in DP.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors used the Delphi method in order to gather, pool, and optimize the knowledgeable opinion of a highly qualified panel of international experts on how to improve DP training. A preliminary phase with open-ended questions was the basis to elaborate a Delphi questionnaire consisting of 14 questions on didactic and clinical training, which was then used in two successive Delphi rounds. Twenty-nine international experts in DP participated throughout the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A series of hierarchical lists on how to improve DP training were elaborated. Regarding didactic training, the experts valued the contents and educational methods, as well as recommended authors and texts. Regarding clinical training, the experts valued educational methods, desirable characteristics in clinical supervisors, how to improve the supervisors' expertise, useful aspects and facilitating questions for direct supervision, and the suitability of including other evaluators besides the supervisor. In the final survey, 94% of the experts considered that the Delphi method had been effective to obtain and improve their opinions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insufficient direct supervision in live interviews was considered the most important problem. A series of general measures were proposed to improve DP training: (i) adapting DP training throughout residency, with introductory and advanced levels; (ii) making DP training compulsory in psychiatry curricula; (iii) assessing residents' DP knowledge and clinical use; and (iv) training the trainers/supervisors in both content (DP) and form (how to train/supervise residents). Within didactic training, epistemology of DP and contemporary and classic authors/texts were the highest rated contents, while supervised discussions based on cases, videos, or readings were the highest rated methods. Within clinical training, 8 aspects of DP that could guide the supervisor were highly rated: mental state examination, dialogue, empathy and understanding, attitude/willingness, knowledge-practice bridge, mental symptom formation, implications for decision-making, and the written report of the encounter.</p>","PeriodicalId":20723,"journal":{"name":"Psychopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000525691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Descriptive psychopathology (DP) is the language of psychiatry and is dedicated to the description of mental symptoms. Despite its core importance, a systematic review identified a series of shortcomings in its training. This Delphi study seeks to provide guidance for better didactic and clinical training in DP.

Method: The authors used the Delphi method in order to gather, pool, and optimize the knowledgeable opinion of a highly qualified panel of international experts on how to improve DP training. A preliminary phase with open-ended questions was the basis to elaborate a Delphi questionnaire consisting of 14 questions on didactic and clinical training, which was then used in two successive Delphi rounds. Twenty-nine international experts in DP participated throughout the study.

Results: A series of hierarchical lists on how to improve DP training were elaborated. Regarding didactic training, the experts valued the contents and educational methods, as well as recommended authors and texts. Regarding clinical training, the experts valued educational methods, desirable characteristics in clinical supervisors, how to improve the supervisors' expertise, useful aspects and facilitating questions for direct supervision, and the suitability of including other evaluators besides the supervisor. In the final survey, 94% of the experts considered that the Delphi method had been effective to obtain and improve their opinions.

Conclusions: Insufficient direct supervision in live interviews was considered the most important problem. A series of general measures were proposed to improve DP training: (i) adapting DP training throughout residency, with introductory and advanced levels; (ii) making DP training compulsory in psychiatry curricula; (iii) assessing residents' DP knowledge and clinical use; and (iv) training the trainers/supervisors in both content (DP) and form (how to train/supervise residents). Within didactic training, epistemology of DP and contemporary and classic authors/texts were the highest rated contents, while supervised discussions based on cases, videos, or readings were the highest rated methods. Within clinical training, 8 aspects of DP that could guide the supervisor were highly rated: mental state examination, dialogue, empathy and understanding, attitude/willingness, knowledge-practice bridge, mental symptom formation, implications for decision-making, and the written report of the encounter.

如何改善精神科住院医师描述性精神病理学训练:德尔菲研究。
目的:描述精神病理学(DP)是精神病学的语言,致力于描述精神症状。尽管它具有核心重要性,但系统审查发现了其培训中的一系列缺点。本德尔菲研究旨在为更好的DP教学和临床培训提供指导。方法:作者使用德尔菲法来收集、汇集和优化一个高素质的国际专家小组关于如何提高DP培训的知识意见。开放式问题的初步阶段是制定德尔菲问卷的基础,该问卷由14个关于教学和临床培训的问题组成,然后在连续的两轮德尔菲中使用。29名国际DP专家参与了整个研究。结果:阐述了如何改进DP培训的一系列层次列表。在教学培训方面,专家们评价了教学内容和教学方法,推荐了作者和教材。在临床培训方面,专家们重视教育方法、临床督导人员应具备的特点、如何提高督导人员的专业知识、对直接督导有用的方面和便利的问题,以及在督导人员之外加入其他评估人员的适宜性。在最终的调查中,94%的专家认为德尔菲法可以有效地获取和完善他们的意见。结论:现场访谈中直接监督不足是最主要的问题。提出了一系列改善住院医师培训的一般措施:(i)将住院医师培训纳入初级和高级水平;(ii)在精神病学课程中必修精神发展辅导课程;(iii)评估居民的DP知识和临床应用;(iv)对培训师/主管进行内容(DP)和形式(如何培训/监督住院医师)的培训。在教学训练中,DP的认识论以及当代和经典作者/文本是评价最高的内容,而基于案例、视频或阅读的监督讨论是评价最高的方法。在临床培训中,DP在心理状态检查、对话、移情与理解、态度/意愿、知识与实践的桥梁、心理症状的形成、对决策的影响、遭遇的书面报告等8个方面对导师的指导作用评价较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychopathology
Psychopathology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Psychopathology'' is a record of research centered on findings, concepts, and diagnostic categories of phenomenological, experimental and clinical psychopathology. Studies published are designed to improve and deepen the knowledge and understanding of the pathogenesis and nature of psychopathological symptoms and psychological dysfunctions. Furthermore, the validity of concepts applied in the neurosciences of mental functions are evaluated in order to closely bring together the mind and the brain. Major topics of the journal are trajectories between biological processes and psychological dysfunction that can help us better understand a subject’s inner experiences and interpersonal behavior. Descriptive psychopathology, experimental psychopathology and neuropsychology, developmental psychopathology, transcultural psychiatry as well as philosophy-based phenomenology contribute to this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信