Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?

Q2 Medicine
World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2022-04-18 eCollection Date: 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1002/wjo2.52
Nicole T Jiam, Yi Cai, Katherine C Wai, Colleen Polite, Kurt Kramer, Jeffrey D Sharon
{"title":"Is the clinical head impulse test helpful in cochlear implantation candidacy evaluation?","authors":"Nicole T Jiam, Yi Cai, Katherine C Wai, Colleen Polite, Kurt Kramer, Jeffrey D Sharon","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Vestibular dysfunction is a known risk of cochlear implantation (CI). However, the utility of the physical exam to screen CI candidates for vestibular dysfunction is not well-studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the preoperative role of the clinical head impulse test (cHIT) in subjects undergoing CI surgery evaluation.</p><p><strong>Study design setting and subjects: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of 64 adult CI candidacy cases between 2017 and 2020 at a tertiary health care center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients underwent audiometric testing and evaluation by the senior author. Patients with an abnormal catch-up saccade contralateral to their worse hearing ear during cHIT were referred for formal vestibular testing. Outcomes included clinical and formal vestibular results, operated ear with regard to audiometric and vestibular results, and postoperative vertigo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among all CI candidates, 44% (<i>n </i>= 28) reported preoperative disequilibrium symptoms. Overall, 62% (<i>n </i>= 40) of the cHITs were normal, 33% (<i>n </i>= 21) were abnormal, and 5% (<i>n </i>= 3) were inconclusive. There was one patient who presented with a false positive cHIT. Among the patients who endorsed disequilibrium, 43% had a positive preoperative cHIT. Fourteen percent of the subjects (<i>n </i>= 9) without disequilibrium had an abnormal cHIT. In this cohort, bilateral vestibular impairment (71%) was more common than unilateral vestibular impairment (29%). In 3% of the cases (<i>n </i>= 2), surgical management was revisited or altered due to cHIT findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a high prevalence of vestibular hypofunction in the CI candidate population. Self-reported assessments of vestibular function are often not congruent with cHIT results. Clinicians should consider incorporating cHITs as part of the preoperative physical exam to potentially avoid bilateral vestibular dysfunction in a minority of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":"45-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/86/WJO2-9-45.PMC10050961.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Vestibular dysfunction is a known risk of cochlear implantation (CI). However, the utility of the physical exam to screen CI candidates for vestibular dysfunction is not well-studied. The objective of this study is to evaluate the preoperative role of the clinical head impulse test (cHIT) in subjects undergoing CI surgery evaluation.

Study design setting and subjects: We conducted a retrospective review of 64 adult CI candidacy cases between 2017 and 2020 at a tertiary health care center.

Methods: All patients underwent audiometric testing and evaluation by the senior author. Patients with an abnormal catch-up saccade contralateral to their worse hearing ear during cHIT were referred for formal vestibular testing. Outcomes included clinical and formal vestibular results, operated ear with regard to audiometric and vestibular results, and postoperative vertigo.

Results: Among all CI candidates, 44% (n = 28) reported preoperative disequilibrium symptoms. Overall, 62% (n = 40) of the cHITs were normal, 33% (n = 21) were abnormal, and 5% (n = 3) were inconclusive. There was one patient who presented with a false positive cHIT. Among the patients who endorsed disequilibrium, 43% had a positive preoperative cHIT. Fourteen percent of the subjects (n = 9) without disequilibrium had an abnormal cHIT. In this cohort, bilateral vestibular impairment (71%) was more common than unilateral vestibular impairment (29%). In 3% of the cases (n = 2), surgical management was revisited or altered due to cHIT findings.

Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of vestibular hypofunction in the CI candidate population. Self-reported assessments of vestibular function are often not congruent with cHIT results. Clinicians should consider incorporating cHITs as part of the preoperative physical exam to potentially avoid bilateral vestibular dysfunction in a minority of patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

临床头脉冲测试对人工耳蜗植入候选评估有帮助吗?
目的:前庭功能障碍是人工耳蜗植入术(CI)的一个已知风险。然而,体检在筛查人工耳蜗植入者前庭功能障碍方面的实用性尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估临床头冲量测试(cHIT)在接受 CI 手术评估的受试者中的术前作用:我们对一家三级医疗保健中心 2017 年至 2020 年间的 64 例成人 CI 候选病例进行了回顾性回顾:所有患者均接受听力测试,并由资深作者进行评估。在 cHIT 过程中,听力较差耳的对侧出现异常追赶囊波的患者将被转诊进行正式的前庭测试。结果包括临床和正式前庭结果、手术耳的听力和前庭结果以及术后眩晕:在所有 CI 候选者中,44%(n = 28)报告了术前失衡症状。总体而言,62%(n = 40)的 cHIT 正常,33%(n = 21)异常,5%(n = 3)不确定。有一名患者出现了 cHIT 假阳性。在认可失衡的患者中,43% 的患者术前 cHIT 呈阳性。在没有失衡的受试者(9 人)中,有 14% 的人 cHIT 异常。在这组患者中,双侧前庭功能障碍(71%)比单侧前庭功能障碍(29%)更常见。3%的病例(2 例)因 cHIT 检查结果而重新考虑或改变了手术治疗方案:结论:在 CI 候选人群中,前庭功能低下的发生率很高。自我报告的前庭功能评估往往与 cHIT 结果不一致。临床医生应考虑将 cHIT 作为术前体检的一部分,以避免少数患者出现双侧前庭功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信