Effects of different exercises on respiratory parameters: A randomized controlled trial

IF 1.3 4区医学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY

Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging Pub Date : 2022-11-26 DOI:10.1111/cpf.12804

Hasan Gercek, Bayram S. Unuvar, Kamil Yilmaz, Ozlem Akkoyun Sert, Sinan Bagcaci

{"title":"Effects of different exercises on respiratory parameters: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Hasan Gercek, Bayram S. Unuvar, Kamil Yilmaz, Ozlem Akkoyun Sert, Sinan Bagcaci","doi":"10.1111/cpf.12804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was designed to compare the effects of core stabilisation (CS) and auxiliary respiratory muscle strengthening exercises on oxygen consumption and respiratory parameters. A total of 51 participants were divided into three groups with block randomization method according to age and gender: CS Group (n = 17), Auxiliary Respiratory Muscles Exercise (ARM) Group (n = 17) and Control (C) Group (n = 17). Maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max), first second of forced expiration (FEV1)/Forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) values were evaluated before and after the study. CS and ARM strengthening exercises were applied 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The increase in the FEV1/VC values was higher in the CS and ARM groups than in the C group (p < 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the ARM and CS groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VO2max values before and after the study (p > 0.05). The increase in the MVV values was higher in the CS and ARM groups than in the C group (p < 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the ARM and CS groups (p > 0.05). CS and ARM exercises had positive effects on FEV1/FVC and MVV.","PeriodicalId":10504,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cpf.12804","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the effects of core stabilisation (CS) and auxiliary respiratory muscle strengthening exercises on oxygen consumption and respiratory parameters. A total of 51 participants were divided into three groups with block randomization method according to age and gender: CS Group (n = 17), Auxiliary Respiratory Muscles Exercise (ARM) Group (n = 17) and Control (C) Group (n = 17). Maximum oxygen uptake (VO₂max), first second of forced expiration (FEV1)/Forced vital capacity (FVC) and maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) values were evaluated before and after the study. CS and ARM strengthening exercises were applied 3 days a week for 6 weeks. The increase in the FEV1/VC values was higher in the CS and ARM groups than in the C group (p < 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the ARM and CS groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of VO₂max values before and after the study (p > 0.05). The increase in the MVV values was higher in the CS and ARM groups than in the C group (p < 0.05), whereas no statistically significant difference was observed between the ARM and CS groups (p > 0.05). CS and ARM exercises had positive effects on FEV1/FVC and MVV.

查看原文本刊更多论文

不同运动对呼吸参数的影响:一项随机对照试验

本研究旨在比较核心稳定(CS)和辅助呼吸肌强化训练对耗氧量和呼吸参数的影响。51例受试者按年龄和性别采用分组随机法分为3组:CS组(n = 17)、辅助呼吸肌运动(ARM)组(n = 17)和对照组(C)组(n = 17)。在研究前后评估最大摄氧量(VO2max)、强迫呼气第一秒(FEV1)/强迫肺活量(FVC)和最大自主通气(MVV)值。CS和ARM强化训练每周3天，连续6周。CS组和ARM组FEV1/VC值的升高高于C组(p < 0.05)，而ARM组和CS组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。研究前后两组VO2max值比较，差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。CS组和ARM组MVV值的升高高于C组(p < 0.05)，而ARM组和CS组间差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CS和ARM运动对FEV1/FVC和MVV均有积极影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging 医学-生理学

CiteScore

3.40

自引率

5.60%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging publishes reports on clinical and experimental research pertinent to human physiology in health and disease. The scope of the Journal is very broad, covering all aspects of the regulatory system in the cardiovascular, renal and pulmonary systems with special emphasis on methodological aspects. The focus for the journal is, however, work that has potential clinical relevance. The Journal also features review articles on recent front-line research within these fields of interest. Covered by the major abstracting services including Current Contents and Science Citation Index, Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging plays an important role in providing effective and productive communication among clinical physiologists world-wide.