Interobserver agreement of computed tomography in detecting calcified intervertebral discs in comparison with radiography in a population of 13 healthy British Dachshund dogs.

IF 1.3 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Veterinary Record Open Pub Date : 2023-03-28 eCollection Date: 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1002/vro2.59
Sara Formoso, Sam Khan, Mark Lowrie, Jonathan Hughes, Paul Freeman
{"title":"Interobserver agreement of computed tomography in detecting calcified intervertebral discs in comparison with radiography in a population of 13 healthy British Dachshund dogs.","authors":"Sara Formoso, Sam Khan, Mark Lowrie, Jonathan Hughes, Paul Freeman","doi":"10.1002/vro2.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aims of this retrospective study were to estimate interobserver agreement in detecting disc calcification with computed tomography (CT) and to compare the number of calcified intervertebral discs identified on CT and radiography in healthy British Dachshund dogs that underwent a screening programme. The current screening programme uses radiography to identify calcified intervertebral discs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Healthy Dachshunds aged between 2 and 5 years presenting for spinal radiography and CT as part of a disc scoring scheme were included. The spinal radiographs were scored by an independent assessor as per the screening programme protocol. The CT images were blinded and reviewed by three different observers of differing levels of experience. The number of discs identified as being calcified was then compared between imaging modalities and between observers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen dogs were included. Overall, 146 calcified discs were identified by CT compared with 42 by radiography. There was an almost perfect agreement among the three observers identifying calcified discs with CT images (<i>k</i> = 0.92). There was a significant difference between the radiography scores and CT scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated a significant difference in the number of calcified intervertebral discs identified in the vertebral column of a small population of healthy Dachshunds between CT and radiography. Given the high agreement between the observers with CT, this may be a reliable method for assessing disc calcification in Dachshund dogs and could be a good candidate for future breeding schemes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23565,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Record Open","volume":"10 1","pages":"e59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10049974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Record Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/vro2.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aims of this retrospective study were to estimate interobserver agreement in detecting disc calcification with computed tomography (CT) and to compare the number of calcified intervertebral discs identified on CT and radiography in healthy British Dachshund dogs that underwent a screening programme. The current screening programme uses radiography to identify calcified intervertebral discs.

Methods: Healthy Dachshunds aged between 2 and 5 years presenting for spinal radiography and CT as part of a disc scoring scheme were included. The spinal radiographs were scored by an independent assessor as per the screening programme protocol. The CT images were blinded and reviewed by three different observers of differing levels of experience. The number of discs identified as being calcified was then compared between imaging modalities and between observers.

Results: Thirteen dogs were included. Overall, 146 calcified discs were identified by CT compared with 42 by radiography. There was an almost perfect agreement among the three observers identifying calcified discs with CT images (k = 0.92). There was a significant difference between the radiography scores and CT scores.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated a significant difference in the number of calcified intervertebral discs identified in the vertebral column of a small population of healthy Dachshunds between CT and radiography. Given the high agreement between the observers with CT, this may be a reliable method for assessing disc calcification in Dachshund dogs and could be a good candidate for future breeding schemes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在 13 只健康的英国腊肠犬中,计算机断层扫描与射线照相术在检测椎间盘钙化方面的观察者间一致性比较。
研究背景这项回顾性研究的目的是估算用计算机断层扫描(CT)检测椎间盘钙化的观察者之间的一致性,并比较在接受筛查计划的健康英国腊肠犬中通过 CT 和放射线检查发现的钙化椎间盘的数量。目前的筛查计划使用射线照相术来识别钙化的椎间盘。方法:纳入年龄在 2 到 5 岁之间的健康腊肠犬,作为椎间盘评分计划的一部分,对其进行脊柱射线照相术和 CT 检查。脊柱X光片由一名独立评估员根据筛查计划协议进行评分。CT 图像由三名不同经验水平的观察者进行盲法审查。然后比较不同成像模式和不同观察者之间被确定为钙化的椎间盘数量:结果:共纳入 13 只狗。总体而言,CT 共发现 146 个钙化椎间盘,而放射摄影发现 42 个。三名观察者通过 CT 图像识别钙化椎间盘的结果几乎完全一致(k = 0.92)。放射成像评分与 CT 评分之间存在明显差异:这项研究表明,在一小部分健康腊肠犬的椎体中发现的钙化椎间盘数量在 CT 和放射摄影之间存在显著差异。鉴于观察者之间对 CT 的高度一致,这可能是评估腊肠犬椎间盘钙化的可靠方法,可作为未来育种计划的良好候选项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary Record Open
Veterinary Record Open VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Record Open is a journal dedicated to publishing specialist veterinary research across a range of topic areas including those of a more niche and specialist nature to that considered in the weekly Vet Record. Research from all disciplines of veterinary interest will be considered. It is an Open Access journal of the British Veterinary Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信