vHIT results with the synapsis system according to clinicians' dominant hand use.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Tuğba Emekci, Mehmet Akif Dündar, Gülce Kirazlı, Feyza İnceoğlu, Deniz Uğur Cengiz, Fatma Men Kilinç, Ercan Karababa, Seray Muzaç, Şeyda Kaya, Hamdi Arbağ
{"title":"vHIT results with the synapsis system according to clinicians' dominant hand use.","authors":"Tuğba Emekci,&nbsp;Mehmet Akif Dündar,&nbsp;Gülce Kirazlı,&nbsp;Feyza İnceoğlu,&nbsp;Deniz Uğur Cengiz,&nbsp;Fatma Men Kilinç,&nbsp;Ercan Karababa,&nbsp;Seray Muzaç,&nbsp;Şeyda Kaya,&nbsp;Hamdi Arbağ","doi":"10.3233/VES-220073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>There exists limited information in the literature on dominant hand preference in relation with vHIT applications. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between the clinician's dominant use of right- or left-hand and vHIT results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Synapsys vHIT Ulmer device was used in the study. The tests were administered by 3 clinicians experienced in vHIT, 2 of whom were right-handed and 1 left-handed. The test was applied to the 94 participants three times, one week apart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, the correlation between right-handed clinicians and left-handed clinicians was examined, and in all SCCs, namely RA, LA, RL, LL, RP and LP, a moderate positive significant correlation was found between right-handed1 and right-handed2, between right-handed1 and left-handed, and between right-handed2 and left-handed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, these findings suggested that measures were reliable across test sessions regardless of hand dominancy (right or left). Based on the vHIT results we obtained with three different right- or left-handed clinicians, the clinician should evaluate the results according to the dominant side.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-220073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: There exists limited information in the literature on dominant hand preference in relation with vHIT applications. The present study aimed to examine the relationship between the clinician's dominant use of right- or left-hand and vHIT results.

Methods: A Synapsys vHIT Ulmer device was used in the study. The tests were administered by 3 clinicians experienced in vHIT, 2 of whom were right-handed and 1 left-handed. The test was applied to the 94 participants three times, one week apart.

Results: In this study, the correlation between right-handed clinicians and left-handed clinicians was examined, and in all SCCs, namely RA, LA, RL, LL, RP and LP, a moderate positive significant correlation was found between right-handed1 and right-handed2, between right-handed1 and left-handed, and between right-handed2 and left-handed.

Conclusions: In this study, these findings suggested that measures were reliable across test sessions regardless of hand dominancy (right or left). Based on the vHIT results we obtained with three different right- or left-handed clinicians, the clinician should evaluate the results according to the dominant side.

vHIT结果与突触系统根据临床医生的优势手使用。
背景/目的:关于优势手偏好与vHIT应用的关系,文献资料有限。本研究旨在探讨临床医生主要使用右手或左手与vHIT结果之间的关系。方法:采用Synapsys vHIT Ulmer装置。测试由3名有vHIT经验的临床医生进行,其中2名是右撇子,1名是左撇子。这项测试对94名参与者进行了三次,间隔一周。结果:本研究考察了右撇子临床医生与左撇子临床医生之间的相关性,在所有SCCs中,即RA、LA、RL、LL、RP和LP,右撇子1与右撇子2、右撇子1与左撇子、右撇子2与左撇子之间存在中度正显著相关。结论:在这项研究中,这些发现表明,无论惯用手(右手还是左手)如何,测试结果都是可靠的。根据我们与三个不同的右撇子或左撇子临床医生获得的vHIT结果,临床医生应根据优势侧评估结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信