Patrick Holton, Ardalan Zolnourian, Diederik Bulters
{"title":"Time to evacuation of acute subdural and extradural haematoma: prospective study before and after implementation of a major trauma centre.","authors":"Patrick Holton, Ardalan Zolnourian, Diederik Bulters","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2023.2173723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b><i>:</i> Patients with Extradural (EDH) and Acute Subdural Haematomas (ASDH) represent a subgroup of head-injured patients that gain the most from timely treatment. While treatment times for head injury overall improved since the introduction of Major Trauma Centres (MTCs), no data exists describing how the time to treatment of EDH and ASDH has changed. We, therefore, compared the evacuation of ASDH and EDH before and after the implementation of a major trauma network.<b>Methods</b><i>:</i> Data was collected prospectively between 1 May 2006 to 31 May 2007 and 1 March 2014 to 31 March 2016. The study was carried out at University Hospital Southampton, designated MTC in 2012. Patients over 18 with ASDH or EDH requiring emergency surgery were included.<b>Results</b><i>:</i> The median time (IQR) for decompression was 4.8h (3.9-6.6) in 2006-7 and 4.4h (3.4-5.9) in 2014-16, <i>p</i> = 0.386. The proportion treated within 4 hours was 32% in 2006-7, and 33% in 2014-16 (<i>p</i> = 1.000). Analysis showed a decrease in time for CT scan (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and acceptance by neurosurgery (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were increases in time for transferring to hospital (<i>p</i> = 0.005), awaiting operating theatre (<i>p</i> = 0.005), and operative time (<i>p</i> = 0.018).<b>Conclusions</b><i>:</i> Since the introduction of MTCs, there has been no significant reduction in time to treat this select group of patients despite reductions in time to treatment of most other trauma and head-injured patients. This may be because parts of the pathway have improved, but others haven't. It is also possible that while previously head injury was poorly served, resources were prioritised to this group so finding further gains is difficult.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"32-39"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2173723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Patients with Extradural (EDH) and Acute Subdural Haematomas (ASDH) represent a subgroup of head-injured patients that gain the most from timely treatment. While treatment times for head injury overall improved since the introduction of Major Trauma Centres (MTCs), no data exists describing how the time to treatment of EDH and ASDH has changed. We, therefore, compared the evacuation of ASDH and EDH before and after the implementation of a major trauma network.Methods: Data was collected prospectively between 1 May 2006 to 31 May 2007 and 1 March 2014 to 31 March 2016. The study was carried out at University Hospital Southampton, designated MTC in 2012. Patients over 18 with ASDH or EDH requiring emergency surgery were included.Results: The median time (IQR) for decompression was 4.8h (3.9-6.6) in 2006-7 and 4.4h (3.4-5.9) in 2014-16, p = 0.386. The proportion treated within 4 hours was 32% in 2006-7, and 33% in 2014-16 (p = 1.000). Analysis showed a decrease in time for CT scan (p = 0.01) and acceptance by neurosurgery (p < 0.001). There were increases in time for transferring to hospital (p = 0.005), awaiting operating theatre (p = 0.005), and operative time (p = 0.018).Conclusions: Since the introduction of MTCs, there has been no significant reduction in time to treat this select group of patients despite reductions in time to treatment of most other trauma and head-injured patients. This may be because parts of the pathway have improved, but others haven't. It is also possible that while previously head injury was poorly served, resources were prioritised to this group so finding further gains is difficult.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide.
Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.