Decision-making in childhood vaccination: vaccine hesitancy among caregivers of under-5 children from a tertiary care institution in Eastern India.

Q2 Medicine
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Pub Date : 2023-02-03 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25151355231152650
Soumya Swaroop Sahoo, Swayam Pragyan Parida, Arvind Kumar Singh, Sarika Palepu, Durgesh Prasad Sahoo, Vikas Bhatia
{"title":"Decision-making in childhood vaccination: vaccine hesitancy among caregivers of under-5 children from a tertiary care institution in Eastern India.","authors":"Soumya Swaroop Sahoo, Swayam Pragyan Parida, Arvind Kumar Singh, Sarika Palepu, Durgesh Prasad Sahoo, Vikas Bhatia","doi":"10.1177/25151355231152650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acceptance of vaccines has been on a decline in recent times, with vaccine hesitancy being listed as one of the top 10 global health threats. This study analysed vaccine hesitancy and belief towards vaccination among caregivers of children aged below 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 196 caregivers of children aged 6 months to below 5 years who had attended an immunization clinic at a tertiary care institute of Eastern India from March to May 2019 were surveyed. Consecutive sampling was used to recruit eligible study participants. The survey assessed the attitudes of parents towards childhood vaccination by using the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale and their beliefs towards vaccination. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the association of various sociodemographic factors with vaccine hesitancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the caregivers, most (48%) mothers were aged 26-35 years, literate and homemakers. Vaccine hesitancy was observed in 9.18% of the participants. Only the age of the child was significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy. Nearly half (48.5%) of the participants were concerned about the serious adverse effects of vaccines, and a third (30.6%) agreed that newer vaccines are associated with higher risks than the older ones. Caregivers felt that vaccines are no longer required for uncommon diseases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concerns regarding vaccine hesitancy are prevalent even among caregivers attending a tertiary care institute. Thus, additional studies are required to assess hesitancy in urban, rural, remote and inaccessible areas. Policymakers ought to conduct periodic assessments and implement necessary remedial measures for the long-term sustenance of the benefits of the national immunization programme.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c9/c0/10.1177_25151355231152650.PMC9900653.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355231152650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acceptance of vaccines has been on a decline in recent times, with vaccine hesitancy being listed as one of the top 10 global health threats. This study analysed vaccine hesitancy and belief towards vaccination among caregivers of children aged below 5 years.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 196 caregivers of children aged 6 months to below 5 years who had attended an immunization clinic at a tertiary care institute of Eastern India from March to May 2019 were surveyed. Consecutive sampling was used to recruit eligible study participants. The survey assessed the attitudes of parents towards childhood vaccination by using the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale and their beliefs towards vaccination. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the association of various sociodemographic factors with vaccine hesitancy.

Results: Among the caregivers, most (48%) mothers were aged 26-35 years, literate and homemakers. Vaccine hesitancy was observed in 9.18% of the participants. Only the age of the child was significantly associated with vaccine hesitancy. Nearly half (48.5%) of the participants were concerned about the serious adverse effects of vaccines, and a third (30.6%) agreed that newer vaccines are associated with higher risks than the older ones. Caregivers felt that vaccines are no longer required for uncommon diseases.

Conclusion: Concerns regarding vaccine hesitancy are prevalent even among caregivers attending a tertiary care institute. Thus, additional studies are required to assess hesitancy in urban, rural, remote and inaccessible areas. Policymakers ought to conduct periodic assessments and implement necessary remedial measures for the long-term sustenance of the benefits of the national immunization programme.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

儿童疫苗接种决策:印度东部一家三级医疗机构中 5 岁以下儿童看护人的疫苗犹豫不决。
背景:近来,疫苗的接受度一直在下降,疫苗接种犹豫被列为全球十大健康威胁之一。本研究分析了 5 岁以下儿童照护者对疫苗接种的犹豫态度和信念:在这项横断面研究中,调查了 196 名 6 个月至 5 岁以下儿童的看护者,他们于 2019 年 3 月至 5 月期间在印度东部一家三级医疗机构的免疫诊所就诊。调查采用连续抽样的方式招募符合条件的研究参与者。调查使用疫苗犹豫量表评估了家长对儿童疫苗接种的态度以及他们对疫苗接种的信念。对各种社会人口因素与疫苗接种犹豫不决的关系进行了单变量分析:在照顾者中,大多数(48%)母亲的年龄在 26-35 岁之间,识字且是家庭主妇。9.18%的参与者存在疫苗接种犹豫。只有孩子的年龄与疫苗接种犹豫有明显关系。近一半(48.5%)的参与者对疫苗的严重不良反应表示担忧,三分之一(30.6%)的参与者认为新疫苗的风险高于旧疫苗。护理人员认为,不常见的疾病不再需要接种疫苗:结论:即使在三级医疗机构就诊的护理人员中,也普遍存在对疫苗犹豫不决的担忧。因此,需要进行更多的研究来评估城市、农村、偏远和交通不便地区的犹豫不决情况。决策者应定期进行评估并采取必要的补救措施,以长期保持国家免疫计划的效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信