TIMP2 and IGFBP-7 as Biomarkers For The Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in Post-operative Patients: An Evidence-Based Case Report.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Acta medica Indonesiana Pub Date : 2023-01-01
Igor Ian Wiguna, Gde Ngurah Irfan Bhaskara, Mutiara Reka Ananda Putri, Priscilla Ardianto, Widi Atmoko
{"title":"TIMP2 and IGFBP-7 as Biomarkers For The Diagnosis of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in Post-operative Patients: An Evidence-Based Case Report.","authors":"Igor Ian Wiguna,&nbsp;Gde Ngurah Irfan Bhaskara,&nbsp;Mutiara Reka Ananda Putri,&nbsp;Priscilla Ardianto,&nbsp;Widi Atmoko","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined as a sudden reduction in kidney function which commonly occurs as a complication of major surgeries. It is traditionally diagnosed using serum creatinine elevation. AKI has relatively slow kinetics that makes it unable to diagnose at an earlier more reversible stage. Furthermore, previous research has shown that TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 were urinary biomarkers to use as a diagnostic tool for AKI. We aimed to compare the accuracy of TIMP2 and IGFBP-7 to the gold standard (serum creatinine) in diagnosing AKI in postoperative patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A thorough search was performed using a search strategy on EMBASE, PubMed, and Medline (Ovid) using keywords according to the objective. The collected articles were critically appraised using CEEBM critical appraisal tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>5 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected and evaluated. They all stated that the use of TIMP2 and IGFBP7 could not detect AKI better than the gold standard as shown in the sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers. Furthermore, the examination of AKI using both biomarkers showed a sensitivity of 60-100% and specificity of 58-91%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TIMP2 and IGFBP7 are promising diagnostic tools for AKI. However, due to the wide variation in results amongst the different studies, further research is required to ensure the credibility of this result.</p>","PeriodicalId":6889,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Indonesiana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is defined as a sudden reduction in kidney function which commonly occurs as a complication of major surgeries. It is traditionally diagnosed using serum creatinine elevation. AKI has relatively slow kinetics that makes it unable to diagnose at an earlier more reversible stage. Furthermore, previous research has shown that TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 were urinary biomarkers to use as a diagnostic tool for AKI. We aimed to compare the accuracy of TIMP2 and IGFBP-7 to the gold standard (serum creatinine) in diagnosing AKI in postoperative patients.

Methods: A thorough search was performed using a search strategy on EMBASE, PubMed, and Medline (Ovid) using keywords according to the objective. The collected articles were critically appraised using CEEBM critical appraisal tool.

Results: 5 studies that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected and evaluated. They all stated that the use of TIMP2 and IGFBP7 could not detect AKI better than the gold standard as shown in the sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers. Furthermore, the examination of AKI using both biomarkers showed a sensitivity of 60-100% and specificity of 58-91%.

Conclusion: TIMP2 and IGFBP7 are promising diagnostic tools for AKI. However, due to the wide variation in results amongst the different studies, further research is required to ensure the credibility of this result.

TIMP2和IGFBP-7作为术后患者急性肾损伤(AKI)诊断的生物标志物:一份基于证据的病例报告
背景:急性肾损伤(AKI)被定义为肾脏功能的突然下降,通常作为大手术的并发症发生。传统的诊断方法是血清肌酐升高。AKI具有相对缓慢的动力学,这使得它无法在早期更可逆的阶段诊断。此外,先前的研究表明TIMP-2和IGFBP7是尿液生物标志物,可作为AKI的诊断工具。我们的目的是比较TIMP2和IGFBP-7与金标准(血清肌酐)在诊断术后AKI患者中的准确性。方法:采用EMBASE、PubMed和Medline (Ovid)的检索策略,根据目标使用关键词进行全面检索。使用CEEBM批判性评价工具对收集的文章进行批判性评价。结果:入选5项符合纳入标准的研究并进行评价。他们都表示,使用TIMP2和IGFBP7不能比金标准更好地检测AKI,这体现在生物标志物的敏感性和特异性上。此外,使用这两种生物标志物检查AKI的灵敏度为60-100%,特异性为58-91%。结论:TIMP2和IGFBP7是很有前景的AKI诊断工具。然而,由于不同研究的结果差异很大,需要进一步的研究来确保这一结果的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta medica Indonesiana
Acta medica Indonesiana MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Medica Indonesiana – The Indonesian Journal of Internal Medicine is an open accessed online journal and comprehensive peer-reviewed medical journal published by the Indonesian Society of Internal Medicine since 1968. Our main mission is to encourage the novel and important science in the clinical area in internal medicine. We welcome authors for original articles (research), review articles, interesting case reports, special articles, clinical practices, and medical illustrations that focus on the clinical area of internal medicine. Subjects suitable for publication include, but are not limited to the following fields of: -Allergy and immunology -Emergency medicine -Cancer and stem cells -Cardiovascular -Endocrinology and Metabolism -Gastroenterology -Gerontology -Hematology -Hepatology -Tropical and Infectious Disease -Virology -Internal medicine -Psychosomatic -Pulmonology -Rheumatology -Renal and Hypertension -Thyroid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信