Impact of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CT coronary angiography scan length and effective radiation dose.

BJR open Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1259/bjro.20210056
Laura Duerden, Helen O'Brien, Susan Doshi, Pia Charters, Laurence King, Benjamin J Hudson, Jonathan Carl Luis Rodrigues
{"title":"Impact of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CT coronary angiography scan length and effective radiation dose.","authors":"Laura Duerden,&nbsp;Helen O'Brien,&nbsp;Susan Doshi,&nbsp;Pia Charters,&nbsp;Laurence King,&nbsp;Benjamin J Hudson,&nbsp;Jonathan Carl Luis Rodrigues","doi":"10.1259/bjro.20210056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Imaged scan length (z-axis coverage) is a simple parameter that can reduce CT dose without compromising image quality. In CT coronary angiography (CTCA), z-axis coverage may be planned using non-contrast calcium score scan (CaCS) to identify the relevant coronary anatomy. However, standardised Agatston CaCS is acquired at 120 kV which adds a relatively high contribution to total study dose and CaCS is no longer routinely recommended in UK guidelines. We evaluate an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CTCA scan length and effective radiation dose.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An ultra-low dose tin filter (Sn-filter) planning scan (100 kVp, maximum iterative reconstruction) was performed and used to plan the z-axis coverage on 48 consecutive CTCAs (62% men, 62 ± 13 years) compared with 47 CTCA planned using a localiser alone (46% men, 59 ± 12 years) between May and June 2019. Excess scanning beyond the ideal scan length was calculated for both groups. Estimations of radiation dose were also compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Addition of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan to CTCA protocol was associated with reduction in overscanning with no impact on image quality. There was no significant difference in total study effective dose with the addition of the planning scan, which had an average dose-length product of 3 mGy.cm. (total study dose: Protocol A 2.1 mSv <i>vs</i> Protocol B 2.2 mSv, <i>p</i> = 0.92).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan facilitates optimal scan length for the diagnostic CTCA, reducing overscanning and preventing incomplete cardiac imaging with no significant dose penalty or impact on image quality.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>An ultra-low dose CTCA planning is feasible and effective at optimising scan length.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459860/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Imaged scan length (z-axis coverage) is a simple parameter that can reduce CT dose without compromising image quality. In CT coronary angiography (CTCA), z-axis coverage may be planned using non-contrast calcium score scan (CaCS) to identify the relevant coronary anatomy. However, standardised Agatston CaCS is acquired at 120 kV which adds a relatively high contribution to total study dose and CaCS is no longer routinely recommended in UK guidelines. We evaluate an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CTCA scan length and effective radiation dose.

Methods: An ultra-low dose tin filter (Sn-filter) planning scan (100 kVp, maximum iterative reconstruction) was performed and used to plan the z-axis coverage on 48 consecutive CTCAs (62% men, 62 ± 13 years) compared with 47 CTCA planned using a localiser alone (46% men, 59 ± 12 years) between May and June 2019. Excess scanning beyond the ideal scan length was calculated for both groups. Estimations of radiation dose were also compared between the two groups.

Results: Addition of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan to CTCA protocol was associated with reduction in overscanning with no impact on image quality. There was no significant difference in total study effective dose with the addition of the planning scan, which had an average dose-length product of 3 mGy.cm. (total study dose: Protocol A 2.1 mSv vs Protocol B 2.2 mSv, p = 0.92).

Conclusion: An ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan facilitates optimal scan length for the diagnostic CTCA, reducing overscanning and preventing incomplete cardiac imaging with no significant dose penalty or impact on image quality.

Advances in knowledge: An ultra-low dose CTCA planning is feasible and effective at optimising scan length.

Abstract Image

超低剂量非增强计划扫描对CT冠状动脉造影扫描长度和有效辐射剂量的影响。
目的:成像扫描长度(z轴覆盖范围)是一个简单的参数,可以在不影响图像质量的情况下减少CT剂量。在CT冠状动脉造影(CTCA)中,可以使用非对比钙评分扫描(CaCS)计划z轴覆盖,以确定相关的冠状动脉解剖结构。然而,标准的Agatston CaCS是在120千伏时获得的,这对总研究剂量增加了相对较高的贡献,英国指南不再常规推荐CaCS。我们评价了超低剂量非增强计划扫描对CTCA扫描长度和有效辐射剂量的影响。方法:在2019年5月至6月期间,进行超低剂量锡过滤器(Sn-filter)计划扫描(100 kVp,最大迭代重建),并用于计划48个连续CTCA(62%男性,62±13岁)的z轴覆盖,与单独使用定位器计划的47个CTCA(46%男性,59±12岁)进行比较。计算两组超出理想扫描长度的多余扫描量。还比较了两组之间的辐射剂量估计值。结果:在CTCA方案中加入超低剂量非增强计划扫描与过度扫描的减少有关,且对图像质量没有影响。加上计划扫描后,总的研究有效剂量没有显著差异,其平均剂量长度积为3mg .cm。(总研究剂量:方案A 2.1 mSv vs方案B 2.2 mSv, p = 0.92)。结论:超低剂量非增强计划扫描有助于诊断CTCA的最佳扫描长度,减少过度扫描,防止心脏成像不完整,且没有明显的剂量损失或影响图像质量。知识进展:超低剂量CTCA计划在优化扫描长度方面是可行和有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信