Effects of polishing press-on force on surface roughness and gloss of CAD-CAM composites.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Peng Yu, Hao Luo, Adrian U Yap, Fu-Cong Tian, Xiao-Yan Wang
{"title":"Effects of polishing press-on force on surface roughness and gloss of CAD-CAM composites.","authors":"Peng Yu,&nbsp;Hao Luo,&nbsp;Adrian U Yap,&nbsp;Fu-Cong Tian,&nbsp;Xiao-Yan Wang","doi":"10.2334/josnusd.22-0402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the effect of polishing press-on force on surface roughness and gloss of computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) composites.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The materials evaluated included a CAD-CAM ceramic, a polymer-infiltrated ceramic, and three filler-based CAD-CAM composites. The CAD-CAM blocks were sectioned, embedded in self-cured resin, finished with abrasive papers and ultrasonically cleaned. Specimens were subsequently polished using the Sof-Lex disk system with 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 N press-on force by means of a custom-made apparatus. Contour arithmetic mean deviation (Ra) and gloss value (GU) data were acquired with a profilometer and glossmeter, respectively, and analyzed using ANOVA/Bonferroni post hoc test and Pearson's correlation (α = 0.05). Representative samples of the various materials at baseline and after each polishing step were examined under scanning electron microscope.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean Ra and GU values ranged from 0.096 ± 0.004 μm to 0.295 ± 0.045 μm and 13.4 ± 1.9 to 67.6 ± 11.3 correspondingly for the various material-force combinations. Surface roughness and gloss were found to be press-on force and material dependent. A moderately strong and negative correlation (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.69) existed between Ra and GU values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For optimal smoothness and gloss, ceramic and polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD-CAM materials must be polished with a 2.0 N force, while filler-based CAD-CAM composites should, in general, be polished using a 1.0 to 1.5 N force.</p>","PeriodicalId":16646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.22-0402","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of polishing press-on force on surface roughness and gloss of computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) composites.

Methods: The materials evaluated included a CAD-CAM ceramic, a polymer-infiltrated ceramic, and three filler-based CAD-CAM composites. The CAD-CAM blocks were sectioned, embedded in self-cured resin, finished with abrasive papers and ultrasonically cleaned. Specimens were subsequently polished using the Sof-Lex disk system with 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 N press-on force by means of a custom-made apparatus. Contour arithmetic mean deviation (Ra) and gloss value (GU) data were acquired with a profilometer and glossmeter, respectively, and analyzed using ANOVA/Bonferroni post hoc test and Pearson's correlation (α = 0.05). Representative samples of the various materials at baseline and after each polishing step were examined under scanning electron microscope.

Results: Mean Ra and GU values ranged from 0.096 ± 0.004 μm to 0.295 ± 0.045 μm and 13.4 ± 1.9 to 67.6 ± 11.3 correspondingly for the various material-force combinations. Surface roughness and gloss were found to be press-on force and material dependent. A moderately strong and negative correlation (rs = -0.69) existed between Ra and GU values.

Conclusion: For optimal smoothness and gloss, ceramic and polymer-infiltrated ceramic CAD-CAM materials must be polished with a 2.0 N force, while filler-based CAD-CAM composites should, in general, be polished using a 1.0 to 1.5 N force.

抛光压紧力对CAD-CAM复合材料表面粗糙度和光泽度的影响
目的:研究抛光压紧力对计算机辅助设计-计算机辅助制造复合材料表面粗糙度和光泽度的影响。方法:评估的材料包括CAD-CAM陶瓷,聚合物渗透陶瓷和三种基于填料的CAD-CAM复合材料。将CAD-CAM块切片,包埋在自固化树脂中,用砂纸完成,并用超声波清洗。随后,通过定制的仪器,使用sofl - lex光盘系统以0.5、1.0、1.5和2.0 N的压力对样品进行抛光。分别用轮廓仪和光泽度仪获取轮廓算术平均偏差(Ra)和光泽度值(GU)数据,采用方差分析/Bonferroni事后检验和Pearson相关分析(α = 0.05)。在扫描电子显微镜下观察了各种材料在基线和每个抛光步骤后的代表性样品。结果:不同材料-力组合下Ra和GU的平均值分别为0.096±0.004 μm ~ 0.295±0.045 μm和13.4±1.9 ~ 67.6±11.3。表面粗糙度和光泽度与压紧力和材料有关。Ra与GU值之间存在较强的负相关(rs = -0.69)。结论:为了获得最佳的光滑度和光泽,陶瓷和聚合物渗透陶瓷CAD-CAM材料必须用2.0 N的力进行抛光,而基于填料的CAD-CAM复合材料通常应使用1.0至1.5 N的力进行抛光。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of oral science
Journal of oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信