Identifying factors associated with adolescents' Intention for childbirth.

Dimitra Varnakioti, Antigoni Sarantaki, Kleanthi Gourounti, Aikaterini Lykeridou
{"title":"Identifying factors associated with adolescents' Intention for childbirth.","authors":"Dimitra Varnakioti,&nbsp;Antigoni Sarantaki,&nbsp;Kleanthi Gourounti,&nbsp;Aikaterini Lykeridou","doi":"10.34763/jmotherandchild.20222601.d-22-00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Around the world, caesarean section rates have steadily increased over the past few decades. The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on nonclinical interventions to reduce caesarean section rates emphasize educational interventions and support programs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this study, we have determined factors associated with adolescents' intention regarding childbirth options using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). The sample was comprised of 480 high school students in Greece who were invited to complete a questionnaire consisting of three sections: a section on sociodemographic data; a section featuring the Adolescents' Intentions towards Birth Options (AIBO) scale, a recently developed instrument that accesses attitudes and intentions regarding vaginal birth and caesarean section; and a section detailing participants' awareness regarding reproduction and birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple logistic regression found that participants' impressions of vaginal birth and the TPB constructs were significantly associated with intention towards caesarean section. In particular, participants with a negative impression of vaginal birth had a 2.20-fold higher probability of reporting their preference for caesarean section, compared to participants with neither a negative nor a positive impression. Furthermore, participants with higher scores on the \"Attitudes towards vaginal birth,\" \"Subjective norms,\" and \"Perceived behavior control over vaginal birth\" subscales had a significantly lower probability of reporting preference for caesarean section.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of the TPB to identify factors that influence adolescents' preference for childbirth. We highlight the necessity to implement nonclinical interventions to reduce the preference for caesarean section, providing evidence for developing school-based educational programs for a timely and consistency implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":73842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mother and child","volume":"26 1","pages":"93-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032313/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mother and child","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34763/jmotherandchild.20222601.d-22-00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Around the world, caesarean section rates have steadily increased over the past few decades. The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on nonclinical interventions to reduce caesarean section rates emphasize educational interventions and support programs.

Material and methods: In this study, we have determined factors associated with adolescents' intention regarding childbirth options using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). The sample was comprised of 480 high school students in Greece who were invited to complete a questionnaire consisting of three sections: a section on sociodemographic data; a section featuring the Adolescents' Intentions towards Birth Options (AIBO) scale, a recently developed instrument that accesses attitudes and intentions regarding vaginal birth and caesarean section; and a section detailing participants' awareness regarding reproduction and birth.

Results: Multiple logistic regression found that participants' impressions of vaginal birth and the TPB constructs were significantly associated with intention towards caesarean section. In particular, participants with a negative impression of vaginal birth had a 2.20-fold higher probability of reporting their preference for caesarean section, compared to participants with neither a negative nor a positive impression. Furthermore, participants with higher scores on the "Attitudes towards vaginal birth," "Subjective norms," and "Perceived behavior control over vaginal birth" subscales had a significantly lower probability of reporting preference for caesarean section.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of the TPB to identify factors that influence adolescents' preference for childbirth. We highlight the necessity to implement nonclinical interventions to reduce the preference for caesarean section, providing evidence for developing school-based educational programs for a timely and consistency implementation.

确定与青少年生育意愿相关的因素。
背景:在过去的几十年里,世界各地的剖腹产率稳步上升。世界卫生组织(WHO)关于减少剖腹产率的非临床干预的指导方针强调教育干预和支持计划。材料和方法:在本研究中,我们使用计划行为理论(TPB)确定了与青少年生育选择意向相关的因素。该样本由480名希腊高中生组成,他们被邀请完成一份由三部分组成的问卷:社会人口统计数据部分;青少年对生育选择的意向(AIBO)量表,这是最近开发的一种工具,用于了解对阴道分娩和剖腹产的态度和意向;还有一个部分详细介绍了参与者对生殖和生育的认识。结果:多元逻辑回归发现参与者对阴道分娩的印象和TPB结构与剖宫产意图显著相关。特别是,对阴道分娩有负面印象的参与者报告自己更喜欢剖腹产的可能性是对阴道分娩没有负面印象和正面印象的参与者的2.20倍。此外,在“对阴道分娩的态度”、“主观规范”和“对阴道分娩的感知行为控制”亚量表上得分较高的参与者报告偏好剖腹产的可能性显着降低。结论:本研究证明了TPB在识别青少年生育偏好影响因素方面的有效性。我们强调实施非临床干预措施以减少剖腹产偏好的必要性,为制定及时和一致实施的校本教育计划提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信