Item Response Theory and Differential Item Functioning Analyses With the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised in US and Chinese Samples.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Jenny Mei Yiu Huen, Paul Siu Fai Yip, Augustine Osman, Angel Nga Man Leung
{"title":"Item Response Theory and Differential Item Functioning Analyses With the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised in US and Chinese Samples.","authors":"Jenny Mei Yiu Huen,&nbsp;Paul Siu Fai Yip,&nbsp;Augustine Osman,&nbsp;Angel Nga Man Leung","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> Despite the widespread use of the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) and advances in item response theory (IRT) modeling, item-level analysis with the SBQ-R has been minimal. <i>Aims:</i> This study extended IRT modeling strategies to examine the response parameters and potential differential item functioning (DIF) of the individual SBQ-R items in samples of US (<i>N</i> = 320) and Chinese (<i>N</i> = 298) undergraduate students. <i>Method:</i> Responses to the items were calibrated using the unidimensional graded response IRT model. Goodness-of-fit, item parameters, and DIF were evaluated. <i>Results:</i> The unidimensional graded response IRT model provided a good fit to the sample data. Results showed that the SBQ-R items had various item discrimination parameters and item severity parameters. Also, each SBQ-R item functioned similarly between the US and Chinese respondents. In particular, Item 1 (history of attempts) demonstrated high discrimination and severity of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors (STBs). <i>Limitations:</i> The use of cross-sectional data from convenience samples of undergraduate students could be considered a major limitation. <i>Conclusion:</i> The findings from the IRT analysis provided empirical support that each SBQ-R item taps into STBs and that scores for Item 1 can be used for screening purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":"44 2","pages":"108-114"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread use of the Suicidal Behaviors Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) and advances in item response theory (IRT) modeling, item-level analysis with the SBQ-R has been minimal. Aims: This study extended IRT modeling strategies to examine the response parameters and potential differential item functioning (DIF) of the individual SBQ-R items in samples of US (N = 320) and Chinese (N = 298) undergraduate students. Method: Responses to the items were calibrated using the unidimensional graded response IRT model. Goodness-of-fit, item parameters, and DIF were evaluated. Results: The unidimensional graded response IRT model provided a good fit to the sample data. Results showed that the SBQ-R items had various item discrimination parameters and item severity parameters. Also, each SBQ-R item functioned similarly between the US and Chinese respondents. In particular, Item 1 (history of attempts) demonstrated high discrimination and severity of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Limitations: The use of cross-sectional data from convenience samples of undergraduate students could be considered a major limitation. Conclusion: The findings from the IRT analysis provided empirical support that each SBQ-R item taps into STBs and that scores for Item 1 can be used for screening purposes.

自杀行为问卷的项目反应理论与差异项目功能分析——美国和中国样本的修订。
背景:尽管《自杀行为修正问卷》(SBQ-R)被广泛使用,并且项目反应理论(IRT)模型也取得了进展,但用SBQ-R进行项目层面的分析却很少。目的:本研究扩展了IRT建模策略,考察了美国(N = 320)和中国(N = 298)大学生对SBQ-R单项的反应参数和潜在差异项目功能(DIF)。方法:采用单维分级反应IRT模型对各题的反应进行校正。评估拟合优度、项目参数和DIF。结果:单维分级反应IRT模型与样本数据拟合较好。结果表明:SBQ-R项目具有多种项目判别参数和项目严重程度参数。此外,每个SBQ-R项目在美国和中国受访者之间的作用相似。其中,项目1(企图史)表现出对自杀相关思想和行为(STBs)的高度歧视和严重程度。局限性:从方便的本科生样本中使用横断面数据可能被认为是一个主要的局限性。结论:IRT分析的结果为SBQ-R的每个项目都触及了stb,项目1的得分可以用于筛选目的提供了实证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信