May Sadik, Jesús López-Urdaneta, Johannes Ulén, Olof Enqvist, Per-Ola Andersson, Rajender Kumar, Elin Trägårdh
{"title":"Artificial Intelligence Increases the Agreement among Physicians Classifying Focal Skeleton/Bone Marrow Uptake in Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients Staged with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT-a Retrospective Study.","authors":"May Sadik, Jesús López-Urdaneta, Johannes Ulén, Olof Enqvist, Per-Ola Andersson, Rajender Kumar, Elin Trägårdh","doi":"10.1007/s13139-022-00765-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Classification of focal skeleton/bone marrow uptake (BMU) can be challenging. The aim is to investigate whether an artificial intelligence-based method (AI), which highlights suspicious focal BMU, increases interobserver agreement among a group of physicians from different hospitals classifying Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients staged with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight patients staged with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT at Sahlgenska University Hospital between 2017 and 2018 were reviewed twice, 6 months apart, regarding focal BMU. During the second time review, the 10 physicians also had access to AI-based advice regarding focal BMU.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each physician's classifications were pairwise compared with the classifications made by all the other physicians, resulting in 45 unique pairs of comparisons both without and with AI advice. The agreement between the physicians increased significantly when AI advice was available, which was measured as an increase in mean Kappa values from 0.51 (range 0.25-0.80) without AI advice to 0.61 (range 0.19-0.94) with AI advice (<i>p</i> = 0.005). The majority of the physicians agreed with the AI-based method in 40 (83%) of the 48 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An AI-based method significantly increases interobserver agreement among physicians working at different hospitals by highlighting suspicious focal BMU in HL patients staged with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT.</p>","PeriodicalId":19384,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10043120/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-022-00765-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Purpose: Classification of focal skeleton/bone marrow uptake (BMU) can be challenging. The aim is to investigate whether an artificial intelligence-based method (AI), which highlights suspicious focal BMU, increases interobserver agreement among a group of physicians from different hospitals classifying Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients staged with [18F]FDG PET/CT.
Methods: Forty-eight patients staged with [18F]FDG PET/CT at Sahlgenska University Hospital between 2017 and 2018 were reviewed twice, 6 months apart, regarding focal BMU. During the second time review, the 10 physicians also had access to AI-based advice regarding focal BMU.
Results: Each physician's classifications were pairwise compared with the classifications made by all the other physicians, resulting in 45 unique pairs of comparisons both without and with AI advice. The agreement between the physicians increased significantly when AI advice was available, which was measured as an increase in mean Kappa values from 0.51 (range 0.25-0.80) without AI advice to 0.61 (range 0.19-0.94) with AI advice (p = 0.005). The majority of the physicians agreed with the AI-based method in 40 (83%) of the 48 cases.
Conclusion: An AI-based method significantly increases interobserver agreement among physicians working at different hospitals by highlighting suspicious focal BMU in HL patients staged with [18F]FDG PET/CT.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (Nucl Med Mol Imaging) is an official journal of the Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine, which bimonthly publishes papers on February, April, June, August, October, and December about nuclear medicine and related sciences such as radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, dosimetry and pharmacokinetics / pharmacodynamics of radiopharmaceuticals, nuclear and molecular imaging analysis, nuclear and molecular imaging instrumentation, radiation biology and radionuclide therapy. The journal specially welcomes works of artificial intelligence applied to nuclear medicine. The journal will also welcome original works relating to molecular imaging research such as the development of molecular imaging probes, reporter imaging assays, imaging cell trafficking, imaging endo(exo)genous gene expression, and imaging signal transduction. Nucl Med Mol Imaging publishes the following types of papers: original articles, reviews, case reports, editorials, interesting images, and letters to the editor.
The Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine (KSNM)
KSNM is a scientific and professional organization founded in 1961 and a member of the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences of the Korean Medical Association which was established by The Medical Services Law. The aims of KSNM are the promotion of nuclear medicine and cooperation of each member. The business of KSNM includes holding academic meetings and symposia, the publication of journals and books, planning and research of promoting science and health, and training and qualification of nuclear medicine specialists.