Community socioeconomic status and rural/racial disparities in HPV−/+ head and neck cancer

Q1 Nursing
Jason Semprini , Jessica C. Williams
{"title":"Community socioeconomic status and rural/racial disparities in HPV−/+ head and neck cancer","authors":"Jason Semprini ,&nbsp;Jessica C. Williams","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) is a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality in the United States, but the burden is not evenly distributed. Rural and racial disparities are obvious across the HNC continuum. Most HNC disparities research have emphasized individual factors perpetuating rural and racial disparities, ignoring the role of community-level factors.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We analyzed data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program’s “Specialized HNC-Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Census-Tract SES” datafile (2010–2016). In addition to cancer patient characteristics, this data includes a socioeconomic status (SES) quintile based on the patient’s census-tract. Our outcome variables included whether the HNC patient 1) was diagnosed at a distant stage, 2) received initial treatment two or more months after diagnosis, 3) received radiation therapy, 4) survived two years after diagnosis. We tested for differences across SES quintiles, in the full sample and then within rural/racial categories. We then tested for differences between each rural/racial category conditional on SES quintile.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>For both HPV(−) and HPV + HNCs, patients in higher SES census-tracts have 8–10% lower rates of distant stage diagnoses and delayed treatment initiation, and 12.0–14.5% higher survival rates than patients in lower SES census-tracts. Radiation treatment only varied across SES quintiles in HPV + HNC patients. We find little evidence of rural–urban differences within each socioeconomic quintile. However, within lower SES quintiles, we found significant racial disparities in delayed detection and treatment. These differences were largest in the lowest SES quintile, as non-Hispanic Black patients reported 10–11% higher rates of delayed detection and treatment initiation than non-Hispanic White patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our research illustrates the value and constraints in leveraging community-level factors in health disparities research that can ultimately assist in designing effective policies that address and achieve rural and racial cancer equity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c2/86/main.PMC10038787.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632423000057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) is a major cause of cancer morbidity and mortality in the United States, but the burden is not evenly distributed. Rural and racial disparities are obvious across the HNC continuum. Most HNC disparities research have emphasized individual factors perpetuating rural and racial disparities, ignoring the role of community-level factors.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program’s “Specialized HNC-Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Census-Tract SES” datafile (2010–2016). In addition to cancer patient characteristics, this data includes a socioeconomic status (SES) quintile based on the patient’s census-tract. Our outcome variables included whether the HNC patient 1) was diagnosed at a distant stage, 2) received initial treatment two or more months after diagnosis, 3) received radiation therapy, 4) survived two years after diagnosis. We tested for differences across SES quintiles, in the full sample and then within rural/racial categories. We then tested for differences between each rural/racial category conditional on SES quintile.

Results

For both HPV(−) and HPV + HNCs, patients in higher SES census-tracts have 8–10% lower rates of distant stage diagnoses and delayed treatment initiation, and 12.0–14.5% higher survival rates than patients in lower SES census-tracts. Radiation treatment only varied across SES quintiles in HPV + HNC patients. We find little evidence of rural–urban differences within each socioeconomic quintile. However, within lower SES quintiles, we found significant racial disparities in delayed detection and treatment. These differences were largest in the lowest SES quintile, as non-Hispanic Black patients reported 10–11% higher rates of delayed detection and treatment initiation than non-Hispanic White patients.

Conclusions

Our research illustrates the value and constraints in leveraging community-level factors in health disparities research that can ultimately assist in designing effective policies that address and achieve rural and racial cancer equity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

HPV−/+头颈癌的社区社会经济地位和农村/种族差异
背景癌症是美国癌症发病率和死亡率的主要原因,但其负担并不均匀。农村和种族差异在整个HNC连续体中是明显的。大多数HNC差异研究都强调了使农村和种族差异长期存在的个人因素,而忽视了社区层面因素的作用。方法我们分析了监测流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目的“专门HNC人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)普查区SES”数据文件(2010-2016)中的数据。除了癌症患者特征外,该数据还包括基于患者症状的社会经济地位(SES)五分位数。我们的结果变量包括HNC患者是否1)在远处被诊断,2)在诊断后两个月或两个月以上接受了初步治疗,3)接受了放射治疗,4)在确诊后存活了两年。我们测试了SES五分位数、全样本以及农村/种族类别之间的差异。然后,我们测试了以SES五分位数为条件的每个农村/种族类别之间的差异。结果对于HPV(−)和HPV+HNCs,SES普查区较高的患者的远处阶段诊断率和延迟治疗开始率比SES普查区域较低的患者低8-10%,生存率高12.0-14.5%。放射治疗仅在HPV+HNC患者的SES五分位数中存在差异。我们几乎没有发现每个社会经济五分之一人口中存在城乡差异的证据。然而,在社会经济地位较低的五分位数中,我们发现在延迟检测和治疗方面存在显著的种族差异。这些差异在SES最低的五分之一人群中最大,因为非西班牙裔黑人患者报告的延迟检测和治疗开始率比非西班裔白人患者高10-11%。结论我们的研究说明了在健康差异研究中利用社区层面因素的价值和限制因素,这些因素最终有助于制定有效的政策,解决和实现癌症农村和种族公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信