Dibakar Borthakur, Rajesh Kumar, Neerja Rani, Rima Dada
{"title":"Novel Osteo Refurbishment Method and Choice of Colouring Materials for Anatomy Specimens.","authors":"Dibakar Borthakur, Rajesh Kumar, Neerja Rani, Rima Dada","doi":"10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.38275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The introduction of competency-based medical education curriculum and a shifted focus towards self-directed learning (SDL) in medical schools across the world has necessitated a reduction of didactic teaching hours. Museum specimens are an indispensable tool in anatomy teaching and can play a pivotal role in fostering and reinforcing SDL. Coloring of specimens makes it attractive and facilitates understanding anatomy. The aims of this study were: (1) weigh up the two commonly used coloring materials in anatomy viz. acrylic paint and nail polish; and (2) to assess the perception of anatomy students towards a Novel Osteo Refurbishment Method (NORM) for restoration of partially damaged osteology specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Undergraduate and postgraduate students of anatomy were recruited in the study. Participants responded to a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. Obtained data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel version 2019. For a comparison of the two coloring agents Mann-Whitney U test was applied to the responses toward the Likert scale-based questionnaire. P-value <0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 318 study participants, 63.7% and 36.3% of the respondents were male and female, respectively. 90.5 % were new entrants to university and the remainder 9.5% had a prior university degree. Students found the acrylic paint to be a better coloring agent and they also opined that NORM generated refurbished osteology specimens could serve as a useful self-learning tool. Acrylic paint was found to be more suitable as compared to nail polish with significant p-value in most of the parameters tested.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Acrylic colour holds a good place in coloring both specimens and models in anatomy. Nail polish can be an alternative but with some noted disadvantages. The initial experience with NORM yielded encouraging results with potential practical utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":37427,"journal":{"name":"Medeniyet medical journal","volume":"38 1","pages":"54-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/05/9d/medj-38-54.PMC10064105.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medeniyet medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/MMJ.galenos.2023.38275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The introduction of competency-based medical education curriculum and a shifted focus towards self-directed learning (SDL) in medical schools across the world has necessitated a reduction of didactic teaching hours. Museum specimens are an indispensable tool in anatomy teaching and can play a pivotal role in fostering and reinforcing SDL. Coloring of specimens makes it attractive and facilitates understanding anatomy. The aims of this study were: (1) weigh up the two commonly used coloring materials in anatomy viz. acrylic paint and nail polish; and (2) to assess the perception of anatomy students towards a Novel Osteo Refurbishment Method (NORM) for restoration of partially damaged osteology specimens.
Methods: Undergraduate and postgraduate students of anatomy were recruited in the study. Participants responded to a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. Obtained data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel version 2019. For a comparison of the two coloring agents Mann-Whitney U test was applied to the responses toward the Likert scale-based questionnaire. P-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Out of 318 study participants, 63.7% and 36.3% of the respondents were male and female, respectively. 90.5 % were new entrants to university and the remainder 9.5% had a prior university degree. Students found the acrylic paint to be a better coloring agent and they also opined that NORM generated refurbished osteology specimens could serve as a useful self-learning tool. Acrylic paint was found to be more suitable as compared to nail polish with significant p-value in most of the parameters tested.
Conclusions: Acrylic colour holds a good place in coloring both specimens and models in anatomy. Nail polish can be an alternative but with some noted disadvantages. The initial experience with NORM yielded encouraging results with potential practical utility.
目标:在世界各地的医学院引入以能力为基础的医学教育课程,并将重点转向自主学习(SDL),因此有必要减少教学时间。博物馆标本是解剖学教学中不可缺少的工具,对培养和加强学生的自主学习具有举足轻重的作用。标本的着色使其具有吸引力,并有助于理解解剖学。本研究的目的是:(1)权衡解剖中常用的两种着色材料,即丙烯酸涂料和指甲油;(2)评估解剖学学生对一种用于修复部分受损骨标本的新型骨修复方法(NORM)的看法。方法:选取解剖学专业本科生和研究生为研究对象。参与者填写了李克特5分制问卷。获得的数据使用Microsoft Excel version 2019进行分析。对于两种着色剂的比较,曼-惠特尼U测试应用于对李克特量表为基础的问卷的回答。p值结果:在318名研究参与者中,63.7%和36.3%的受访者分别是男性和女性。90.5%是大学新生,剩下的9.5%之前有大学学位。学生们发现丙烯酸颜料是一种更好的着色剂,他们也认为NORM生成的翻新骨标本可以作为一种有用的自学工具。丙烯酸涂料比指甲油更适合,在大多数测试参数中p值显著。结论:亚克力颜料在解剖标本和模型着色中都占有很好的地位。指甲油也是一种替代品,但也有一些明显的缺点。NORM的初步经验产生了令人鼓舞的结果,具有潜在的实用价值。
期刊介绍:
The Medeniyet Medical Journal (Medeniyet Med J) is an open access, peer-reviewed, and scientific journal of Istanbul Medeniyet University Faculty of Medicine on various academic disciplines in medicine, which is published in English four times a year, in March, June, September, and December by a group of academics. Medeniyet Medical Journal is the continuation of Göztepe Medical Journal (ISSN: 1300-526X) which was started publishing in 1985. It changed the name as Medeniyet Medical Journal in 2015. Submission and publication are free of charge. No fees are asked from the authors for evaluation or publication process. All published articles are available online in the journal website (www.medeniyetmedicaljournal.org) without any fee. The journal publishes intradisciplinary or interdisciplinary clinical, experimental, and basic researches as well as original case reports, reviews, invited reviews, or letters to the editor, Being published since 1985, the Medeniyet Med J recognizes that the best science should lead to better lives based on the fact that the medicine should serve to the needs of society, and knowledge should transform society. The journal aims to address current issues at both national and international levels, start debates, and exert an influence on decision-makers all over the world by integrating science in everyday life. Medeniyet Med J is committed to serve the public and influence people’s lives in a positive way by making science widely accessible. Believing that the only goal is improving lives, and research has an impact on people’s lives, we select the best research papers in line with this goal.