Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Surgical Site Infections following Stoma Reversal in Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2023-12-31 Epub Date: 2023-02-05 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2023.2175079
Junjia Zhu, Qi Sun, Wenlong Xu, Jun Geng, Qiang Feng, Zhenguo Zhao, Sen Li
{"title":"Effect of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Surgical Site Infections following Stoma Reversal in Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Junjia Zhu, Qi Sun, Wenlong Xu, Jun Geng, Qiang Feng, Zhenguo Zhao, Sen Li","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2023.2175079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical site infections (SSI) are common complications after surgery, which cause other complications and increase medical costs. However, the effect of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for the prevention of SSI at stoma reversal remains inconclusive, with controversial results. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NPWT following stoma reversal in colorectal surgery to prevent SSI and other wound complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published up to July 2022 and identified relevant studies reporting the NPWT administration following stoma reversal in colorectal surgery compared with non-pressure dressing. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI, and the secondary outcomes were hematoma, seroma, and length of hospital stay (LOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, with 825 patients with (n = 310) or without (n = 515) NPWT. Pooled SSI rate was lower in the NPWT group than in the non-pressure dressing group (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.84; P = 0.01). There was no significant effect on hematoma (OR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.03, 1.27; P = 0.09), seroma (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.05, 1.28; P = 0.1) and LOS (MD = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.83, 0.51; P = 0.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of NPWT following stoma reversal in colorectal surgery reduced the incidence of SSI. However, this conclusion needs to be interpreted with caution, and further studies should be conducted to confirm in higher-quality RCTs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2175079"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2023.2175079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical site infections (SSI) are common complications after surgery, which cause other complications and increase medical costs. However, the effect of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for the prevention of SSI at stoma reversal remains inconclusive, with controversial results. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of NPWT following stoma reversal in colorectal surgery to prevent SSI and other wound complications.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for articles published up to July 2022 and identified relevant studies reporting the NPWT administration following stoma reversal in colorectal surgery compared with non-pressure dressing. The primary outcome was the incidence of SSI, and the secondary outcomes were hematoma, seroma, and length of hospital stay (LOS).

Results: Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, with 825 patients with (n = 310) or without (n = 515) NPWT. Pooled SSI rate was lower in the NPWT group than in the non-pressure dressing group (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.84; P = 0.01). There was no significant effect on hematoma (OR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.03, 1.27; P = 0.09), seroma (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.05, 1.28; P = 0.1) and LOS (MD = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.83, 0.51; P = 0.64).

Conclusion: The use of NPWT following stoma reversal in colorectal surgery reduced the incidence of SSI. However, this conclusion needs to be interpreted with caution, and further studies should be conducted to confirm in higher-quality RCTs.

负压伤口疗法对结直肠手术造口翻修后手术部位感染的影响:一项 Meta 分析。
背景:手术部位感染(SSI)是手术后常见的并发症,会引起其他并发症并增加医疗费用。然而,负压伤口疗法(NPWT)在造口翻转术中预防 SSI 的效果尚无定论,结果也存在争议。本荟萃分析旨在评估结直肠手术造口翻转术后使用负压伤口疗法预防 SSI 和其他伤口并发症的安全性和有效性:我们对PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库中截至2022年7月发表的文章进行了系统性检索,并确定了报告结直肠手术造口翻转后NPWT与非压力敷料相比的相关研究。主要结果为 SSI 发生率,次要结果为血肿、血清肿和住院时间(LOS):荟萃分析纳入了九项研究,共有 825 名患者使用(n = 310)或未使用(n = 515)NPWT。NPWT组的汇总SSI率低于非加压包扎组(OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.29, 0.84; P = 0.01)。对血肿(OR = 0.21; 95% CI: 0.03, 1.27; P = 0.09)、血清肿(OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.05, 1.28; P = 0.1)和LOS(MD = -0.16, 95% CI: -0.83, 0.51; P = 0.64)没有明显影响:结论:在结直肠手术中翻转造口后使用 NPWT 可降低 SSI 的发生率。结论:在结直肠手术中翻转造口后使用 NPWT 可降低 SSI 的发生率,但对这一结论的解释需谨慎,应在质量更高的 RCT 中进行进一步研究证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信