Jaxon Baum, Gracie Baum, Cameron Cox, Ian Valerio, Brendan MacKay
{"title":"Use and efficacy of porcine urinary bladder matrix for tissue regeneration: a review.","authors":"Jaxon Baum, Gracie Baum, Cameron Cox, Ian Valerio, Brendan MacKay","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Porcine-derived UBM, a type of acellular ECM, has demonstrated clinical utility for tissue repair and regeneration across various body systems. UBM acts as a full-thickness, exogenic skin substitute and scaffolding for soft tissue reconstruction while mimicking the function and properties of human ECM. This review presents an overview of the current literature evaluating UBM's clinical and preclinical utility across a broad range of applications. A compilation of studies of human and animal patients with a multitude of tissue defects resulting from various pathologic or injurious processes were systematically reviewed. The types of reconstructions included were categorized by the following surgical domains: abdominal wall; cardiothoracic and pulmonary; gastrointestinal; neurosurgery; oral and maxillofacial; otolaryngology or head and neck; ophthalmology; orthopedic or plastic or orthoplastic surgery; burn and wound care; and urology and gynecology. This systematic review illustrates that UBM may perform as well as or better than other ECM mimetics across various parameters, including reduced time to definitive wound closure, recurrence of wound, infection and/or complication rates, and immunogenic transplant rejection; reduction in overall cost burden to the patient, improved patient satisfaction, and ease of use and maintenance for providers; increased cellular recruitment, invasion, differentiation, and proliferation; and increased repair and regeneration of tissue. This tissue regeneration tends to be more functionally, mechanically, and histologically similar to native tissue through tissue-specific functional remodeling and maturation. This clinical outcome can be seen in various tissue types, levels of injury, and/or defect severity. UBM also proves valuable because of its ability to be used off-the-shelf in surgical, nonsurgical, or office and in-the-field treatment settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23752,"journal":{"name":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","volume":"35 10","pages":"E339-E375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wounds : a compendium of clinical research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Porcine-derived UBM, a type of acellular ECM, has demonstrated clinical utility for tissue repair and regeneration across various body systems. UBM acts as a full-thickness, exogenic skin substitute and scaffolding for soft tissue reconstruction while mimicking the function and properties of human ECM. This review presents an overview of the current literature evaluating UBM's clinical and preclinical utility across a broad range of applications. A compilation of studies of human and animal patients with a multitude of tissue defects resulting from various pathologic or injurious processes were systematically reviewed. The types of reconstructions included were categorized by the following surgical domains: abdominal wall; cardiothoracic and pulmonary; gastrointestinal; neurosurgery; oral and maxillofacial; otolaryngology or head and neck; ophthalmology; orthopedic or plastic or orthoplastic surgery; burn and wound care; and urology and gynecology. This systematic review illustrates that UBM may perform as well as or better than other ECM mimetics across various parameters, including reduced time to definitive wound closure, recurrence of wound, infection and/or complication rates, and immunogenic transplant rejection; reduction in overall cost burden to the patient, improved patient satisfaction, and ease of use and maintenance for providers; increased cellular recruitment, invasion, differentiation, and proliferation; and increased repair and regeneration of tissue. This tissue regeneration tends to be more functionally, mechanically, and histologically similar to native tissue through tissue-specific functional remodeling and maturation. This clinical outcome can be seen in various tissue types, levels of injury, and/or defect severity. UBM also proves valuable because of its ability to be used off-the-shelf in surgical, nonsurgical, or office and in-the-field treatment settings.
期刊介绍:
Wounds is the most widely read, peer-reviewed journal focusing on wound care and wound research. The information disseminated to our readers includes valuable research and commentaries on tissue repair and regeneration, biology and biochemistry of wound healing, and clinical management of various wound etiologies.
Our multidisciplinary readership consists of dermatologists, general surgeons, plastic surgeons, vascular surgeons, internal medicine/family practitioners, podiatrists, gerontologists, researchers in industry or academia (PhDs), orthopedic surgeons, infectious disease physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. These practitioners must be well equipped to deal with a myriad of chronic wound conditions affecting their patients including vascular disease, diabetes, obesity, dermatological disorders, and more.
Whether dealing with a traumatic wound, a surgical or non-skin wound, a burn injury, or a diabetic foot ulcer, wound care professionals turn to Wounds for the latest in research and practice in this ever-growing field of medicine.