Management of biliary obstruction in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis: a Swiss retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sandra Müller, Soleen Ghafoor, Cordula Meyer Zu Schwabedissen, Felix Grimm, Fritz Ruprecht Murray, Lars Husmann, Nadine Stanek, Peter Deplazes, Christoph Schlag, Andreas E Kremer, Christoph Gubler, Cäcilia S Reiner, David Semela, Beat Müllhaupt, Ansgar Deibel
{"title":"Management of biliary obstruction in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis: a Swiss retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Sandra Müller, Soleen Ghafoor, Cordula Meyer Zu Schwabedissen, Felix Grimm, Fritz Ruprecht Murray, Lars Husmann, Nadine Stanek, Peter Deplazes, Christoph Schlag, Andreas E Kremer, Christoph Gubler, Cäcilia S Reiner, David Semela, Beat Müllhaupt, Ansgar Deibel","doi":"10.57187/smw.2023.40116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Alveolar echinococcosis, an orphan zoonosis affecting the liver, is of increasing concern worldwide. Most symptomatic cases present at an advanced and inoperable stage, sometimes with biliary obstruction prompting biliary tract interventions. These are, however, associated with a high risk of infectious complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of conservative and interventional treatment approaches in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis and biliary obstruction.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Alveolar echinococcosis patients treated at two referral centres in Switzerland, presenting with hyperbilirubinaemia (total bilirubin >1.5 Upper Limit of Normal) at diagnosis were included, unless another underlying aetiology, i.e. common bile duct stones or decompensated cirrhosis, was identified. Patients were divided into two groups, according to whether they initially received a biliary tract intervention. The primary endpoint was normalisation of bilirubin levels within a 6-month period. Secondary endpoints included, among others, the occurrence of early and late biliary complications, the need for biliary tract interventions during follow-up and overall duration of hospital stays for treatment initiation and for biliary complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>28 patients were included in this study, of whom 17 received benzimidazole therapy alone and 11 additionally received a biliary tract intervention. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. All but one patient in each group achieved the primary endpoint (p=0.747). Biliary tract intervention was associated with faster laboratory improvement (t1/2 1.3 vs 3.0 weeks), but also with more frequent early biliary complications (7/11 vs 1/17, p=0.002) and longer initial hospital stay (18 days vs 7 days, p=0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biliary obstruction in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis can be treated effectively with benzimidazole therapy alone. Biliary tract intervention, on the other hand, is associated with a high complication rate and should probably be reserved for patients with insufficient response to benzimidazole therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/smw.2023.40116","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and study aims: Alveolar echinococcosis, an orphan zoonosis affecting the liver, is of increasing concern worldwide. Most symptomatic cases present at an advanced and inoperable stage, sometimes with biliary obstruction prompting biliary tract interventions. These are, however, associated with a high risk of infectious complications. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of conservative and interventional treatment approaches in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis and biliary obstruction.

Patients and methods: Alveolar echinococcosis patients treated at two referral centres in Switzerland, presenting with hyperbilirubinaemia (total bilirubin >1.5 Upper Limit of Normal) at diagnosis were included, unless another underlying aetiology, i.e. common bile duct stones or decompensated cirrhosis, was identified. Patients were divided into two groups, according to whether they initially received a biliary tract intervention. The primary endpoint was normalisation of bilirubin levels within a 6-month period. Secondary endpoints included, among others, the occurrence of early and late biliary complications, the need for biliary tract interventions during follow-up and overall duration of hospital stays for treatment initiation and for biliary complications.

Results: 28 patients were included in this study, of whom 17 received benzimidazole therapy alone and 11 additionally received a biliary tract intervention. Baseline characteristics did not differ between groups. All but one patient in each group achieved the primary endpoint (p=0.747). Biliary tract intervention was associated with faster laboratory improvement (t1/2 1.3 vs 3.0 weeks), but also with more frequent early biliary complications (7/11 vs 1/17, p=0.002) and longer initial hospital stay (18 days vs 7 days, p=0.007).

Conclusion: Biliary obstruction in patients with newly diagnosed alveolar echinococcosis can be treated effectively with benzimidazole therapy alone. Biliary tract intervention, on the other hand, is associated with a high complication rate and should probably be reserved for patients with insufficient response to benzimidazole therapy.

新诊断的肺泡包虫病患者胆道阻塞的处理:一项瑞士回顾性队列研究。
背景与研究目的:肺泡包虫病是一种罕见的肝脏人畜共患病,近年来越来越受到世界各国的关注。大多数有症状的病例出现在晚期和不能手术的阶段,有时伴有胆道梗阻,促使胆道干预。然而,这些都与感染并发症的高风险有关。本回顾性研究的目的是比较保守和介入治疗方法在新诊断的肺泡包虫病和胆道梗阻患者中的有效性和安全性。患者和方法:在瑞士的两个转诊中心接受治疗的肺泡包虫病患者,在诊断时表现为高胆红素血症(总胆红素1.5正常上限),除非确定了其他潜在病因,即胆总管结石或失代偿性肝硬化。根据患者最初是否接受过胆道干预,将患者分为两组。主要终点是6个月内胆红素水平的正常化。次要终点包括早期和晚期胆道并发症的发生、随访期间胆道干预的需要以及开始治疗和胆道并发症的总住院时间。结果:本研究纳入28例患者,其中17例患者单独接受苯并咪唑治疗,11例患者同时接受胆道干预。各组间基线特征无差异。除1例患者外,各组均达到主要终点(p=0.747)。胆道干预与更快的实验室改善(t1/2 1.3周vs 3.0周)相关,但也与更频繁的早期胆道并发症(7/11 vs 1/17, p=0.002)和更长的初次住院时间(18天vs 7天,p=0.007)相关。结论:新诊断的肺泡包虫病胆道梗阻患者单独应用苯并咪唑可有效治疗。另一方面,胆道干预与高并发症发生率相关,可能应该保留给对苯并咪唑治疗反应不足的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信