Validation of an electronic self-administered version of the Dimensional Inventory of Stress and Trauma Across the Lifespan in a large sample of young adults.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Emily M Cohodes, Jeffrey D Mandell, Madeline E Notti, Mary Margaret Schroeder, Rachel Ababio, Sarah McCauley, Jasmyne C Pierre, H R Hodges, Dylan G Gee
{"title":"Validation of an electronic self-administered version of the Dimensional Inventory of Stress and Trauma Across the Lifespan in a large sample of young adults.","authors":"Emily M Cohodes, Jeffrey D Mandell, Madeline E Notti, Mary Margaret Schroeder, Rachel Ababio, Sarah McCauley, Jasmyne C Pierre, H R Hodges, Dylan G Gee","doi":"10.1037/tra0001606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent advances in the dimensional assessment of traumatic stress have initiated research examining correlates of exposure to specific features of stress. However, existing tools require intensive, in-person, clinician administration to generate the rich phenotypic data required for such analyses. These approaches are time consuming, costly, and substantially restrict the degree to which assessment tools can be disseminated in large-scale studies, constraining the refinement of existing dimensional models of early adversity. Here, we present an electronic adaptation of the Dimensional Inventory of Stress and Trauma Across the Lifespan (DISTAL), called the DISTAL-Electronic (DISTAL-E), present descriptive statistics drawn from a large sample of <i>N</i> = 500 young adult participants who completed the novel measure, and provide information about its psychometric properties. Results suggest that the DISTAL-E adequately assesses the following dimensional indices of traumatic stress exposure: type, chronicity, age of onset, severity, proximity, caregiver involvement, controllability, predictability, betrayal, threat, and deprivation and that it has excellent content and convergent validity and good test-retest reliability over a 7-11 day period. Although the development of the DISTAL-E facilitates the broad assessment of dimensions of stress exposure in large-scale datasets and has the potential to increase access to stress-related research to a wider group of participants who may not be able to access clinical research in traditional, in-person, clinic-based settings, the generalizability of results of the present study may be constrained by the fact that study participants were primarily White, educated, and with middle-to-high income. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":"813-820"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11089071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001606","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advances in the dimensional assessment of traumatic stress have initiated research examining correlates of exposure to specific features of stress. However, existing tools require intensive, in-person, clinician administration to generate the rich phenotypic data required for such analyses. These approaches are time consuming, costly, and substantially restrict the degree to which assessment tools can be disseminated in large-scale studies, constraining the refinement of existing dimensional models of early adversity. Here, we present an electronic adaptation of the Dimensional Inventory of Stress and Trauma Across the Lifespan (DISTAL), called the DISTAL-Electronic (DISTAL-E), present descriptive statistics drawn from a large sample of N = 500 young adult participants who completed the novel measure, and provide information about its psychometric properties. Results suggest that the DISTAL-E adequately assesses the following dimensional indices of traumatic stress exposure: type, chronicity, age of onset, severity, proximity, caregiver involvement, controllability, predictability, betrayal, threat, and deprivation and that it has excellent content and convergent validity and good test-retest reliability over a 7-11 day period. Although the development of the DISTAL-E facilitates the broad assessment of dimensions of stress exposure in large-scale datasets and has the potential to increase access to stress-related research to a wider group of participants who may not be able to access clinical research in traditional, in-person, clinic-based settings, the generalizability of results of the present study may be constrained by the fact that study participants were primarily White, educated, and with middle-to-high income. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

在大量年轻人样本中验证电子自我管理版本的压力和创伤维度量表。
最近在创伤应激的维度评估方面取得的进展已经开始研究暴露于特定压力特征的相关性。然而,现有的工具需要密集的、面对面的临床医生管理来生成这种分析所需的丰富表型数据。这些方法耗时、昂贵,并且极大地限制了评估工具在大规模研究中的传播程度,限制了对现有早期逆境维度模型的改进。在这里,我们提出了一个电子版的压力和创伤维度量表,称为DISTAL- e (DISTAL- e),从N = 500名完成新测量的年轻成年参与者的大样本中提取描述性统计数据,并提供了有关其心理测量特性的信息。结果表明,DISTAL-E量表充分评估了创伤应激暴露的类型、慢性、发病年龄、严重程度、接近性、照顾者参与、可控性、可预测性、背叛、威胁和剥夺等维度指标,具有良好的内容效度和收敛效度,在7-11天的时间内具有良好的重测信度。尽管DISTAL-E的开发促进了对大规模数据集中压力暴露维度的广泛评估,并有可能使更广泛的参与者群体获得与压力相关的研究,这些参与者可能无法在传统的、面对面的、基于诊所的环境中获得临床研究,但本研究结果的普遍性可能受到研究参与者主要是受过教育的白人这一事实的限制。以及中高收入人群。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信