Adsorption of aflatoxin B1 by different antimycotoxin additives: bentonite, clinoptilolite, and beta-glucans extracted from yeast cell wall.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 MYCOLOGY
Mycotoxin Research Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1007/s12550-023-00508-z
Luara Medianeira de Lima Schlösser, Cristina Tonial Simões, Janine Alves Sarturi, Cristiane Rosa da Silva, Isadora Fabris Laber, Dison Stracke Pfingsten Franco, Carlos Augusto Mallmann
{"title":"Adsorption of aflatoxin B<sub>1</sub> by different antimycotoxin additives: bentonite, clinoptilolite, and beta-glucans extracted from yeast cell wall.","authors":"Luara Medianeira de Lima Schlösser, Cristina Tonial Simões, Janine Alves Sarturi, Cristiane Rosa da Silva, Isadora Fabris Laber, Dison Stracke Pfingsten Franco, Carlos Augusto Mallmann","doi":"10.1007/s12550-023-00508-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study aims to evaluate and compare antimycotoxin additives (AMAs) composed of bentonite (AMA 1), clinoptilolite (AMA 2), and beta-glucans extracted from yeast cell wall (AMA 3), with respect to their ability to bind Aflatoxin B<sub>1</sub> (AFB<sub>1</sub>) using the isothermal models of Freundlich, Langmuir, and BET. The additives were submitted to an in vitro adsorption experiment with AFB<sub>1</sub> (0.05-4 mg L<sup>-1</sup>), using solutions of pH 3 and pH 6, with an inclusion rate of 0.5%, and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS. At pH 3, for the seven concentrations evaluated, AMA 1 obtained adsorption rates (99.69 to 99.98%) higher (p < 0. 05) than the other AMAs, which were from 82.97 to 88.72% (AMA 2) and from 79.43 to 89.32% (AMA 3). At pH 6, in concentrations of 1, 2, and 4 mg L<sup>-1</sup> of AFB<sub>1</sub>, AMA 1 obtained higher (p < 0.05) adsorption results (97.86 to 99.86%) than AMA 2 (91.98 to 96.12%) and AMA 3 (87.56 to 93.50%). The Freundlich model best fitted the AMA 1 adsorption data. For the other additives, the Langmuir model obtained the best fit, demonstrating q<sub>m</sub> of 8.6 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 3 and 2.3 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 6 for AMA 2; and for AMA 3, with q<sub>m</sub> of 3.4 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 3 and 2.3 mg g<sup>-1</sup> at pH 6. The isotherm models work as an effective tool to describe the adsorption process whereas the AMA adsorption capacity varies as a function of product composition, pH, and mycotoxin content.</p>","PeriodicalId":19060,"journal":{"name":"Mycotoxin Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycotoxin Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12550-023-00508-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate and compare antimycotoxin additives (AMAs) composed of bentonite (AMA 1), clinoptilolite (AMA 2), and beta-glucans extracted from yeast cell wall (AMA 3), with respect to their ability to bind Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) using the isothermal models of Freundlich, Langmuir, and BET. The additives were submitted to an in vitro adsorption experiment with AFB1 (0.05-4 mg L-1), using solutions of pH 3 and pH 6, with an inclusion rate of 0.5%, and analyzed by HPLC-MS/MS. At pH 3, for the seven concentrations evaluated, AMA 1 obtained adsorption rates (99.69 to 99.98%) higher (p < 0. 05) than the other AMAs, which were from 82.97 to 88.72% (AMA 2) and from 79.43 to 89.32% (AMA 3). At pH 6, in concentrations of 1, 2, and 4 mg L-1 of AFB1, AMA 1 obtained higher (p < 0.05) adsorption results (97.86 to 99.86%) than AMA 2 (91.98 to 96.12%) and AMA 3 (87.56 to 93.50%). The Freundlich model best fitted the AMA 1 adsorption data. For the other additives, the Langmuir model obtained the best fit, demonstrating qm of 8.6 mg g-1 at pH 3 and 2.3 mg g-1 at pH 6 for AMA 2; and for AMA 3, with qm of 3.4 mg g-1 at pH 3 and 2.3 mg g-1 at pH 6. The isotherm models work as an effective tool to describe the adsorption process whereas the AMA adsorption capacity varies as a function of product composition, pH, and mycotoxin content.

Abstract Image

不同抗霉菌毒素添加剂:膨润土、斜发沸石和酵母细胞壁提取的葡聚糖对黄曲霉毒素B1的吸附。
本研究旨在利用Freundlich、Langmuir和BET等温模型,评价和比较由膨润土(AMA 1)、斜沸石(AMA 2)和从酵母细胞壁提取的β -葡聚糖(AMA 3)组成的抗霉菌毒素添加剂(AMA)结合黄曲霉毒素B1 (AFB1)的能力。将添加物与AFB1 (0.05 ~ 4 mg L-1)进行体外吸附实验,溶液pH为3、pH为6,包合率为0.5%,采用HPLC-MS/MS进行分析。在pH值为3时,AMA 1对AFB1的吸附率(99.69 ~ 99.98%)较高(p -1), AMA 1在pH值为3时的吸附率为8.6 mg g-1,在pH值为6时的吸附率为2.3 mg g-1;在pH值为3时,qm为3.4 mg g-1,在pH值为6时,qm为2.3 mg g-1。等温线模型是描述吸附过程的有效工具,而AMA的吸附能力随产品组成、pH和霉菌毒素含量的变化而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mycotoxin Research
Mycotoxin Research MYCOLOGYTOXICOLOGY-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Mycotoxin Research, the official publication of the Society for Mycotoxin Research, is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal dealing with all aspects related to toxic fungal metabolites. The journal publishes original research articles and reviews in all areas dealing with mycotoxins. As an interdisciplinary platform, Mycotoxin Research welcomes submission of scientific contributions in the following research fields: - Ecology and genetics of mycotoxin formation - Mode of action of mycotoxins, metabolism and toxicology - Agricultural production and mycotoxins - Human and animal health aspects, including exposure studies and risk assessment - Food and feed safety, including occurrence, prevention, regulatory aspects, and control of mycotoxins - Environmental safety and technology-related aspects of mycotoxins - Chemistry, synthesis and analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信