Factors influencing hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction in adults: a systematic review of the past decade.

IF 1.8 3区医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY

International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-14 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2023.2272562

Bopane Mothemela, Vinaya Manchaiah, Faheema Mahomed-Asmail, Megan Knoetze, De Wet Swanepoel

{"title":"Factors influencing hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction in adults: a systematic review of the past decade.","authors":"Bopane Mothemela, Vinaya Manchaiah, Faheema Mahomed-Asmail, Megan Knoetze, De Wet Swanepoel","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2023.2272562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This systematic review examined the audiological and non-audiological factors that influence hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction in adults based on studies published during the last decade (2010 and 2023).Design: Studies were identified by using PRISMA guidelines for systematic searches on five platforms (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, EBSCOhost including CINAHL and Academic Search Complete). The National Institute of Health Quality assessment tool and the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine tool were used for quality assessment and grading of level of evidence.Results: Forty-six articles were included in the review. A total of 101 significant factors influencing hearing aid use (n = 47), benefit (n = 17) and satisfaction (n = 37) were identified. Clear determinants of hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction included hearing sensitivity, self-reported hearing difficulty, speech perception, attitude and beliefs. 34 cross-sectional studies in this review were graded level 4, 9 cohort studies rated level 3, and 3 randomised control trials rated level 2.Conclusion: Factors associated with hearing aid outcomes identified in the past decade support previous evidence. New factors like social networks and service-delivery models, have also been identified. These factors require further investigations through high quality studies to further strengthen existing evidence.","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"661-674"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2023.2272562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review examined the audiological and non-audiological factors that influence hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction in adults based on studies published during the last decade (2010 and 2023).

Design: Studies were identified by using PRISMA guidelines for systematic searches on five platforms (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, EBSCOhost including CINAHL and Academic Search Complete). The National Institute of Health Quality assessment tool and the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine tool were used for quality assessment and grading of level of evidence.

Results: Forty-six articles were included in the review. A total of 101 significant factors influencing hearing aid use (n = 47), benefit (n = 17) and satisfaction (n = 37) were identified. Clear determinants of hearing aid use, benefit and satisfaction included hearing sensitivity, self-reported hearing difficulty, speech perception, attitude and beliefs. 34 cross-sectional studies in this review were graded level 4, 9 cohort studies rated level 3, and 3 randomised control trials rated level 2.

Conclusion: Factors associated with hearing aid outcomes identified in the past decade support previous evidence. New factors like social networks and service-delivery models, have also been identified. These factors require further investigations through high quality studies to further strengthen existing evidence.

查看原文本刊更多论文

影响成人助听器使用、益处和满意度的因素:过去十年的系统回顾。

目的:本系统综述基于过去十年(2010年和2023年)发表的研究，研究了影响成人助听器使用、受益和满意度的听力学和非听力学因素。设计:在五个平台(Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, EBSCOhost，包括CINAHL和Academic Search Complete)上使用PRISMA指南进行系统搜索，确定研究。使用国家卫生研究所质量评估工具和牛津循证医学中心工具进行质量评估和证据水平分级。结果:共纳入46篇文献。共确定了101个影响助听器使用(n = 47)、受益(n = 17)和满意度(n = 37)的显著因素。助听器使用、受益和满意度的明确决定因素包括听力敏感性、自我报告的听力困难、言语感知、态度和信念。本综述中34项横断面研究被评为4级，9项队列研究被评为3级，3项随机对照试验被评为2级。结论:在过去十年中发现的与助听器结果相关的因素支持先前的证据。社交网络和服务交付模式等新因素也已被确认。这些因素需要通过高质量的研究进一步调查，以进一步加强现有的证据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.80%

发文量

133

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.