DNA Damage Response After Treatment of Cycling and Quiescent Cord Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells With Distinct Genotoxic Noxae.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
STEM CELLS Pub Date : 2024-02-08 DOI:10.1093/stmcls/sxad085
Fabienne Becker, Meryem Ouzin, Stefanie Liedtke, Katharina Raba, Gesine Kogler
{"title":"DNA Damage Response After Treatment of Cycling and Quiescent Cord Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells With Distinct Genotoxic Noxae.","authors":"Fabienne Becker, Meryem Ouzin, Stefanie Liedtke, Katharina Raba, Gesine Kogler","doi":"10.1093/stmcls/sxad085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from cord blood can be applied as an alternative to bone marrow in transplantation to treat hematological diseases. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) consists of cycling and non-cycling CD34+/CD45low cells needed for long-term and short-term engraftment. After sorting and subsequent in vitro culture, quiescent HSCs enter the cell cycle. This enables the analysis of HSCs in 2 different cell cycle stages and the comparison of their responses to different genotoxic noxae. To analyze different mechanisms of DNA damage induction in cells, 2 different genotoxins were compared: etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor that targets mitosis in the S/G2-phase of the cell cycle and the alkylating nitrosamine N-Nitroso-N-methylurea (MNU), which leads to the formation of methyl DNA adducts resulting in DNA double breaks during DNA replication and persistent mutations. Cycling cells recovered after treatment even with higher concentrations of etoposide (1.5µM/ 5µM/10µM), while sorted cells treated with MNU (0.1mM/0.3mM/0.5mM/1mM/3Mm/ 5mM) recovered after treatment with the lower MNU concentrations whereas high MNU concentrations resulted in apoptosis activation. Quiescent cells were not affected by etoposide treatment showing no damage upon entry into the cell cycle. Treatment with MNU, similarly to the cycling cells, resulted in a dose-dependent cell death. In conclusion, we found that depending on the genotoxic trigger and the cycling status, CD34+cells have distinct responses to DNA damage. Cycling cells employ both DDR and apoptosis mechanisms to prevent damage accumulation. Quiescent cells predominantly undergo apoptosis upon damage, but their cell cycle status protects them from certain genotoxic insults.</p>","PeriodicalId":231,"journal":{"name":"STEM CELLS","volume":" ","pages":"158-171"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STEM CELLS","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/stmcls/sxad085","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) from cord blood can be applied as an alternative to bone marrow in transplantation to treat hematological diseases. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) consists of cycling and non-cycling CD34+/CD45low cells needed for long-term and short-term engraftment. After sorting and subsequent in vitro culture, quiescent HSCs enter the cell cycle. This enables the analysis of HSCs in 2 different cell cycle stages and the comparison of their responses to different genotoxic noxae. To analyze different mechanisms of DNA damage induction in cells, 2 different genotoxins were compared: etoposide, a topoisomerase II inhibitor that targets mitosis in the S/G2-phase of the cell cycle and the alkylating nitrosamine N-Nitroso-N-methylurea (MNU), which leads to the formation of methyl DNA adducts resulting in DNA double breaks during DNA replication and persistent mutations. Cycling cells recovered after treatment even with higher concentrations of etoposide (1.5µM/ 5µM/10µM), while sorted cells treated with MNU (0.1mM/0.3mM/0.5mM/1mM/3Mm/ 5mM) recovered after treatment with the lower MNU concentrations whereas high MNU concentrations resulted in apoptosis activation. Quiescent cells were not affected by etoposide treatment showing no damage upon entry into the cell cycle. Treatment with MNU, similarly to the cycling cells, resulted in a dose-dependent cell death. In conclusion, we found that depending on the genotoxic trigger and the cycling status, CD34+cells have distinct responses to DNA damage. Cycling cells employ both DDR and apoptosis mechanisms to prevent damage accumulation. Quiescent cells predominantly undergo apoptosis upon damage, but their cell cycle status protects them from certain genotoxic insults.

不同基因毒性的脐带血造血干细胞循环和静止后的DNA损伤反应。
来自脐带血的造血干细胞(HSC)可以作为骨髓移植的替代品来治疗血液病。脐带血(UCB)由长期和短期移植所需的循环和非循环CD34+/CD45low细胞组成。经过分选和随后的体外培养,静止的造血干细胞进入细胞周期。这使得分析造血干细胞在两个不同的细胞周期阶段,并比较它们对不同基因毒性气体的反应。为了分析细胞DNA损伤诱导的不同机制,研究人员比较了两种不同的基因毒素:依托oposide(一种靶向细胞周期S/ g2期有丝分裂的拓扑异构酶II抑制剂)和烷基化亚硝胺n -亚硝基- n -甲基脲(MNU),后者导致甲基DNA加合物的形成,导致DNA复制和持续突变过程中的DNA双断裂。循环细胞在较高浓度(1.5µM/ 5µM/10µM)处理后恢复,而用MNU (0.1mM/0.3mM/0.5mM/1mM/3Mm/ 5mM)处理的分选细胞在较低MNU浓度处理后恢复,而高MNU浓度导致细胞凋亡活化。静止细胞不受依托泊苷处理的影响,在进入细胞周期后没有损伤。与循环细胞类似,用MNU治疗导致剂量依赖性细胞死亡。总之,我们发现根据基因毒性触发和循环状态,CD34+细胞对DNA损伤有不同的反应。循环细胞采用DDR和凋亡机制来防止损伤积累。静止细胞在受到损伤时主要发生凋亡,但它们的细胞周期状态保护它们免受某些基因毒性损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
STEM CELLS
STEM CELLS 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
1.90%
发文量
104
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: STEM CELLS, a peer reviewed journal published monthly, provides a forum for prompt publication of original investigative papers and concise reviews. STEM CELLS is read and written by clinical and basic scientists whose expertise encompasses the rapidly expanding fields of stem and progenitor cell biology. STEM CELLS covers: Cancer Stem Cells, Embryonic Stem Cells/Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cells, Regenerative Medicine, Stem Cell Technology: Epigenetics, Genomics, Proteomics, and Metabonomics, Tissue-Specific Stem Cells, Translational and Clinical Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信