Integrating microbiome science and evolutionary medicine into animal health and conservation

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Sally L. Bornbusch, Michael L. Power, Jay Schulkin, Christine M. Drea, Michael T. Maslanka, Carly R. Muletz-Wolz
{"title":"Integrating microbiome science and evolutionary medicine into animal health and conservation","authors":"Sally L. Bornbusch,&nbsp;Michael L. Power,&nbsp;Jay Schulkin,&nbsp;Christine M. Drea,&nbsp;Michael T. Maslanka,&nbsp;Carly R. Muletz-Wolz","doi":"10.1111/brv.13030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Microbiome science has provided groundbreaking insights into human and animal health. Similarly, evolutionary medicine – the incorporation of eco-evolutionary concepts into primarily human medical theory and practice – is increasingly recognised for its novel perspectives on modern diseases. Studies of host–microbe relationships have been expanded beyond humans to include a wide range of animal taxa, adding new facets to our understanding of animal ecology, evolution, behaviour, and health. In this review, we propose that a broader application of evolutionary medicine, combined with microbiome science, can provide valuable and innovative perspectives on animal care and conservation. First, we draw on classic ecological principles, such as alternative stable states, to propose an eco-evolutionary framework for understanding variation in animal microbiomes and their role in animal health and wellbeing. With a focus on mammalian gut microbiomes, we apply this framework to populations of animals under human care, with particular relevance to the many animal species that suffer diseases linked to gut microbial dysfunction (e.g. gut distress and infection, autoimmune disorders, obesity). We discuss diet and microbial landscapes (i.e. the microbes in the animal's external environment), as two factors that are (<i>i</i>) proposed to represent evolutionary mismatches for captive animals, (<i>ii</i>) linked to gut microbiome structure and function, and (<i>iii</i>) potentially best understood from an evolutionary medicine perspective. Keeping within our evolutionary framework, we highlight the potential benefits – and pitfalls – of modern microbial therapies, such as pre- and probiotics, faecal microbiota transplants, and microbial rewilding. We discuss the limited, yet growing, empirical evidence for the use of microbial therapies to modulate animal gut microbiomes beneficially. Interspersed throughout, we propose 12 actionable steps, grounded in evolutionary medicine, that can be applied to practical animal care and management. We encourage that these actionable steps be paired with integration of eco-evolutionary perspectives into our definitions of appropriate animal care standards. The evolutionary perspectives proposed herein may be best appreciated when applied to the broad diversity of species under human care, rather than when solely focused on humans. We urge animal care professionals, veterinarians, nutritionists, scientists, and others to collaborate on these efforts, allowing for simultaneous care of animal patients and the generation of valuable empirical data.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"99 2","pages":"458-477"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microbiome science has provided groundbreaking insights into human and animal health. Similarly, evolutionary medicine – the incorporation of eco-evolutionary concepts into primarily human medical theory and practice – is increasingly recognised for its novel perspectives on modern diseases. Studies of host–microbe relationships have been expanded beyond humans to include a wide range of animal taxa, adding new facets to our understanding of animal ecology, evolution, behaviour, and health. In this review, we propose that a broader application of evolutionary medicine, combined with microbiome science, can provide valuable and innovative perspectives on animal care and conservation. First, we draw on classic ecological principles, such as alternative stable states, to propose an eco-evolutionary framework for understanding variation in animal microbiomes and their role in animal health and wellbeing. With a focus on mammalian gut microbiomes, we apply this framework to populations of animals under human care, with particular relevance to the many animal species that suffer diseases linked to gut microbial dysfunction (e.g. gut distress and infection, autoimmune disorders, obesity). We discuss diet and microbial landscapes (i.e. the microbes in the animal's external environment), as two factors that are (i) proposed to represent evolutionary mismatches for captive animals, (ii) linked to gut microbiome structure and function, and (iii) potentially best understood from an evolutionary medicine perspective. Keeping within our evolutionary framework, we highlight the potential benefits – and pitfalls – of modern microbial therapies, such as pre- and probiotics, faecal microbiota transplants, and microbial rewilding. We discuss the limited, yet growing, empirical evidence for the use of microbial therapies to modulate animal gut microbiomes beneficially. Interspersed throughout, we propose 12 actionable steps, grounded in evolutionary medicine, that can be applied to practical animal care and management. We encourage that these actionable steps be paired with integration of eco-evolutionary perspectives into our definitions of appropriate animal care standards. The evolutionary perspectives proposed herein may be best appreciated when applied to the broad diversity of species under human care, rather than when solely focused on humans. We urge animal care professionals, veterinarians, nutritionists, scientists, and others to collaborate on these efforts, allowing for simultaneous care of animal patients and the generation of valuable empirical data.

将微生物组科学和进化医学纳入动物健康和保护。
微生物组科学为人类和动物健康提供了开创性的见解。同样,进化医学——将生态进化概念纳入主要的人类医学理论和实践——因其对现代疾病的新观点而日益得到认可。宿主-微生物关系的研究已经从人类扩展到广泛的动物类群,为我们对动物生态学、进化、行为和健康的理解增加了新的方面。在这篇综述中,我们提出进化医学的广泛应用,结合微生物组科学,可以为动物护理和保护提供有价值的和创新的视角。首先,我们借鉴经典的生态学原理,如替代稳定状态,提出一个生态进化框架,以理解动物微生物组的变化及其在动物健康和福祉中的作用。以哺乳动物肠道微生物组为重点,我们将这一框架应用于人类护理下的动物种群,特别是与许多患有与肠道微生物功能障碍相关疾病的动物物种(例如肠道窘迫和感染,自身免疫性疾病,肥胖)相关。我们讨论了饮食和微生物景观(即动物外部环境中的微生物),作为两个因素(i)被提出代表圈养动物的进化不匹配,(ii)与肠道微生物组结构和功能相关,以及(iii)从进化医学的角度可能最好地理解。在我们的进化框架内,我们强调了现代微生物疗法的潜在益处和缺陷,例如益生菌和益生菌,粪便微生物群移植和微生物野化。我们讨论了有限的,但不断增长的,使用微生物疗法来调节动物肠道微生物有益的经验证据。我们在进化医学的基础上提出了12个可操作的步骤,这些步骤可以应用于实际的动物护理和管理。我们鼓励将这些可行的步骤与生态进化的观点结合起来,纳入我们对适当动物护理标准的定义中。本文提出的进化观点在应用于人类照顾下的物种的广泛多样性时,而不是仅仅关注人类时,可能会得到最好的理解。我们敦促动物护理专业人员、兽医、营养学家、科学家和其他人在这些努力上进行合作,允许同时照顾动物病人和产生有价值的经验数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信