{"title":"Investigating the suitability of data-driven methods for extracting physical parameters in cosmological models","authors":"K.Y. Kim, H.W. Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.ascom.2023.100762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent cosmological observations have reached a level of precision that enables the determination and statistical analysis of cosmological parameters with increased accuracy. Despite the significant progress in observational data, our current understanding is still insufficient to fully elucidate the origins of dark energy and dark matter. Addressing the complexities of the observational data may necessitate the development of more sophisticated data analysis techniques or the formulation of new theoretical models. The estimation of some cosmological parameters exhibits variations depending on the chosen physical model, even when utilizing the same observational data. In order to overcome model-dependence, alternative methods such as machine learning techniques based solely on observed data are being explored. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that while this approach may provide insights into the underlying physical laws, it also carries the risk of generating entirely unphysical interpretations.</p><p>The primary objective of this article is to identify the most appropriate data-driven method for extracting physical parameters in cosmological models, with a specific focus on determining the values of two critical parameters: the Hubble constant (<span><math><msub><mrow><mi>H</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>) and the density parameter for dark energy (<span><math><msubsup><mrow><mi>Ω</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>Λ</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0</mn></mrow></msubsup></math></span>). Our research findings demonstrate a rigorous comparison between the results derived exclusively from observational data and those predicted by the theoretical <span><math><mi>ΛCDM</mi></math></span> (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) model. Through this comparative analysis, we have successfully reaffirmed the effectiveness of the <span><math><mi>ΛCDM</mi></math></span> model in accurately describing the current observed universe.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48757,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy and Computing","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100762"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221313372300077X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent cosmological observations have reached a level of precision that enables the determination and statistical analysis of cosmological parameters with increased accuracy. Despite the significant progress in observational data, our current understanding is still insufficient to fully elucidate the origins of dark energy and dark matter. Addressing the complexities of the observational data may necessitate the development of more sophisticated data analysis techniques or the formulation of new theoretical models. The estimation of some cosmological parameters exhibits variations depending on the chosen physical model, even when utilizing the same observational data. In order to overcome model-dependence, alternative methods such as machine learning techniques based solely on observed data are being explored. However, it is crucial to acknowledge that while this approach may provide insights into the underlying physical laws, it also carries the risk of generating entirely unphysical interpretations.
The primary objective of this article is to identify the most appropriate data-driven method for extracting physical parameters in cosmological models, with a specific focus on determining the values of two critical parameters: the Hubble constant () and the density parameter for dark energy (). Our research findings demonstrate a rigorous comparison between the results derived exclusively from observational data and those predicted by the theoretical (Lambda Cold Dark Matter) model. Through this comparative analysis, we have successfully reaffirmed the effectiveness of the model in accurately describing the current observed universe.
Astronomy and ComputingASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICSCOMPUTER SCIENCE,-COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍:
Astronomy and Computing is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the broad area between astronomy, computer science and information technology. The journal aims to publish the work of scientists and (software) engineers in all aspects of astronomical computing, including the collection, analysis, reduction, visualisation, preservation and dissemination of data, and the development of astronomical software and simulations. The journal covers applications for academic computer science techniques to astronomy, as well as novel applications of information technologies within astronomy.