Macroscopic assessment and dissection of colorectal cancer resection specimens

L. Ludeman, N.A. Shepherd
{"title":"Macroscopic assessment and dissection of colorectal cancer resection specimens","authors":"L. Ludeman,&nbsp;N.A. Shepherd","doi":"10.1016/j.cdip.2006.03.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The accurate dissection of resection specimens forms a very important part of colorectal cancer patient management in that important prognostic data, gleaned from the resection specimen, strongly influence postoperative management, including being the most important determinant of the decision to institute adjuvant therapy, influencing decisions on patient follow-up and assessing likely prognosis and survival. Furthermore, pathological assessment is being increasingly used as a tool to make judgements on the quality of colorectal cancer surgery. Sadly, the task of dissecting the gross specimen has been seen as an unwanted and less than skilful chore and has, in the past, been the task of the most junior member of staff, who is often ill prepared and untrained for such an important role. The past few years have seen a dramatic change in this practice, in the UK and many Western European countries, such that it is now accepted that no amount of sophisticated microscopic analysis can redeem a case that has not been dissected and sampled for histology appropriately. The introduction of Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) minimum datasets and protocols, for the accurate pathological assessment of specimens, has done much to improve the situation. However, although pathologists can now diligently record all pathological data of importance as part of such datasets, question marks still remain about the overall quality of such data. For instance, there are now compelling data to indicate the importance of adequate lymph node harvests. Yet recent audits have still demonstrated that lymph node harvests remain low in some centres, and this has an important influence on management decisions for individual patients. In this treatise, we discuss optimal macroscopic assessment practice for colorectal cancer resections and also consider the changes in the newly updated Royal College of Pathologists colorectal cancer minimum dataset and proforma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87954,"journal":{"name":"Current diagnostic pathology","volume":"12 3","pages":"Pages 220-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cdip.2006.03.004","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current diagnostic pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968605306000378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The accurate dissection of resection specimens forms a very important part of colorectal cancer patient management in that important prognostic data, gleaned from the resection specimen, strongly influence postoperative management, including being the most important determinant of the decision to institute adjuvant therapy, influencing decisions on patient follow-up and assessing likely prognosis and survival. Furthermore, pathological assessment is being increasingly used as a tool to make judgements on the quality of colorectal cancer surgery. Sadly, the task of dissecting the gross specimen has been seen as an unwanted and less than skilful chore and has, in the past, been the task of the most junior member of staff, who is often ill prepared and untrained for such an important role. The past few years have seen a dramatic change in this practice, in the UK and many Western European countries, such that it is now accepted that no amount of sophisticated microscopic analysis can redeem a case that has not been dissected and sampled for histology appropriately. The introduction of Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) minimum datasets and protocols, for the accurate pathological assessment of specimens, has done much to improve the situation. However, although pathologists can now diligently record all pathological data of importance as part of such datasets, question marks still remain about the overall quality of such data. For instance, there are now compelling data to indicate the importance of adequate lymph node harvests. Yet recent audits have still demonstrated that lymph node harvests remain low in some centres, and this has an important influence on management decisions for individual patients. In this treatise, we discuss optimal macroscopic assessment practice for colorectal cancer resections and also consider the changes in the newly updated Royal College of Pathologists colorectal cancer minimum dataset and proforma.

结直肠癌切除标本的宏观评价与解剖
切除标本的准确解剖是结直肠癌患者管理的一个非常重要的组成部分,因为从切除标本中收集的重要预后数据对术后管理有很大的影响,包括是决定是否进行辅助治疗的最重要决定因素,影响患者随访的决定以及评估可能的预后和生存。此外,病理评估越来越多地被用作判断结直肠癌手术质量的工具。可悲的是,解剖粗大标本的任务一直被视为一项不必要的、缺乏技巧的苦差事,过去一直是最初级的工作人员的任务,他们往往没有做好准备,也没有接受过培训,无法胜任如此重要的角色。在过去的几年里,在英国和许多西欧国家,这种做法发生了巨大的变化,以至于现在人们认为,没有多少复杂的显微镜分析可以弥补一个没有被解剖和取样的病例。引入皇家病理学家学院(RCPath)的最小数据集和方案,对标本进行准确的病理评估,已经大大改善了这种情况。然而,尽管病理学家现在可以勤奋地记录所有重要的病理数据作为这些数据集的一部分,但这些数据的整体质量仍然存在疑问。例如,现在有令人信服的数据表明充分的淋巴结收集的重要性。然而,最近的审计仍然表明,一些中心的淋巴结收成仍然很低,这对个别患者的管理决策有重要影响。在这篇论文中,我们讨论了结肠直肠癌切除的最佳宏观评估实践,并考虑了新更新的皇家病理学院结肠直肠癌最小数据集和形式的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信